Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo | fourth video in the DI series | Dependency Injection library

 by   slidenerd Java Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo Summary

kandi X-RAY | Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo Summary

Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo is a Java library typically used in Programming Style, Dependency Injection applications. Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This demo shows you how to setup and use Dagger 2 Dependency Injection library in your Android apps. This is what you will see once you run the app in your device or emulator. Step 0 : Ask yourself 3 questions. Let's say we want SharedPreferences to be supplied to us by Dagger.

            kandi-support Support

              Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 23 star(s) with 16 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 11 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.
              Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo saves you 96 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 245 lines of code, 19 functions and 15 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Handle the clicked callback event on the view
            • Stores the text in the preferences
            • Override this to handle menu item selection
            • Initializes the shared preferences
            • Override this method to initialize the views
            • Sets the instance state
            • On createView
            • Click the TextView
            • OnCreate view
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo.

            Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo.

            Community Discussions


            dependency injection life cycle for IDisposable classes in .NET core
            Asked 2022-Mar-29 at 09:28

            I want to know, what is the best way to dispose the all IDisposable object after the request done.

            • AddTransient - adds a type that is created again each time it's requested.
            • AddScoped - adds a type that is kept for the scope of the request.
            • AddSingleton - adds a type when it's first requested and keeps hold of it.

            So, singleton could not be a good choice because it will disposes after app shot down. but scope and transient are good candidates. I have a repository which I want to create a connection with my db like this:



            Answered 2022-Mar-29 at 09:28

            After reading the comments I got that, I have to set the the interface as IDisposable to dispose the connection, so I changed my code like this:



            Mock a go-logr and verify the message it logs?
            Asked 2022-Mar-14 at 09:58

            Im using the following go-logr/logr library. I have a test which needs to pass the logger as parameter and check that it was able to log the data that was sent.

            I need to test the function GetConfig:



            Answered 2022-Mar-10 at 14:44

            The logr.New function accepts any implementation of the LogSink interface - This means you should just implement one that saves the calls onto a slice in-memory instead of printing, and then you can expect that the slice has your log output.



            How to register ServiceBusClient for dependency injection?
            Asked 2022-Feb-08 at 14:11

            I’m trying to register ServiceBusClient from the new Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus package for dependency injection as recommended in this article using ServiceBusClientBuilderExtensions, but I can’t find any documentation or any help online on how exactly to go about this.

            I'm trying to add as below



            Answered 2021-Sep-02 at 20:03


            Execution failed for task ':app:kaptDebugKotlin' - Error Occurs while using Hilt
            Asked 2022-Feb-06 at 08:14

            Added hilt dependencies:




            Answered 2021-Sep-13 at 13:35

            So, it appears there is an issue integrating Hilt while targeting version 31 (Android 12).

            When I had:



            How to create beans dynamically using a DI framework
            Asked 2022-Jan-22 at 11:44

            requirement is like this: user input is single character followed by an array of integers, such as 'A 1 2', 'B 3 4 5', 'C 1', etc. The single character means which class to construct and integers are input parameter to that constructor. Please note different classes might need different number of integers.

            Then we need to write a program to parse user input and create objects accordingly.

            My approach was to use regular expression for parsing and hard code which class to call.

            But another senior developer said a better idea would be using dependency injection to automatically create objects based on user input. He gave another hint to create an interface and use spring framework dependency injection (not spring boot).

            I am still confused how to create beans dynamically in this way. Can anybody help please?



            Answered 2022-Jan-22 at 11:44

            You can create a common interface for the classes that can be created, and a Factory bean that transforms the input.



            .NET Core Dependency Injection how to handle multiple objects
            Asked 2021-Dec-29 at 06:56

            As the title says I have a .NET Core application that I am trying to convert over to and take advantage of the built in Microsoft Dependency Injection.

            I have an object and a base class for the object, call it CommunicationBase and Communicator. When my app starts up and reads the configuration file, I can have N number of objects to instantiate.

            Previously, before switching to Dependency Injection, somewhere in my startup routine, where I read the configuration file, I would have a List variable that I would instantiate and add Communicator objects to and at the same time, set some of the base properties, which changed based on how many were in my configuration and each ones properties in config.

            How would I achieve this with DI?

            I understand that in my services, I would register the type so it can be injected into other class constructors.

            For example, services.AddTransient(); but as I understand it, this just registers the types with DI. I can inject it into a class and have a random instance of one of them.

            How would I then have N number of instances and be able to set properties of each one as I create the instance?

            Or, is this a scenario where DI is not necessary or won't work and I need to just do it the way I was doing it before?




            Answered 2021-Dec-28 at 11:26

            Firstly do you need to has clear the differences between Transient, Scoped, Singleton lifetime. To understand how works with the list of Communicator objects that will be read from your configuration file.

            One approuch to resolve your question is

            1. Create an interface ICommunicatorList with one method to get a List, i mean you can envolve the list of communicators.
            2. Create a clase that inherits from ICommunicatorList (for example called CommunicatorList), with a private field for your list of Communicators. On the constructor method set your private field with the list of communicator, o here you can receive like a parameter from the section of the config file to iterate and full your private field.
            3. on this class implement your code to return the list of communicators.
            4. Now, in your startups file you can now create the service services.AddTransient< ICommunicatorList>(x => new CommunicatorList(parameters));



            Unsatisfied dependency exception for bean type java.util.Properties
            Asked 2021-Dec-19 at 22:27

            I have a Spring Framework 5.3.10 application — not Spring Boot. I'm running into a rather trivial problem creating/injecting a Properties bean. Here is my setup:



            Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 22:27

            The used (spring standard) "factory" implements FactoryBean as InitializingBean ...

            As designed Approach



            .Net 6 Console app: WebApplication.CreateBuilder vs Host.CreateDefaultBuilder
            Asked 2021-Dec-14 at 08:36

            I'm looking into .NET 6, and wanted to build a simple console application, with some dependency injection.

            From what i can read, a lot has been done to make the startup (now just program) file, more readable. What does confuse me a bit is, that all improvements seems to have been made to WebApplication.CreateBuilderpart used in API projects, and not the Host.CreateDefaultBuilder. As mentioned in this blog

            Microsofts own docs, also only seems to mention WebApplication.

            To me it seems like WebApplication is only for web projects, like an API, and i can't find anything that confirms og debunks that.

            Is it okay to use WebApplication in a console application, or should i rely on Host, and keep the stacked lambda expressions ?



            Answered 2021-Dec-14 at 08:36

            WebApplication.CreateBuilderpart() is only used for web/api applications like the name implies Host.CreateDefaultBuilder() is used to build a generic host (without web services, middleware etc) which you can use to build anything other than webhost.

            See for example; Which has not changed.

            Its true that it feels a bit awkward to build console apps and/or backgroundservices at the moment.



            Autofac: IEnumerable will always return a list of objects derive from IInterface?
            Asked 2021-Oct-27 at 05:03

            I inherited a fairly large codebase that makes heavy use of Autofac. I discover something interesting or even slightly puzzling.

            I have a class as such



            Answered 2021-Oct-27 at 05:03

            This behavior is documented in Implicit Relationship Types

            For example, when Autofac is injecting a constructor parameter of type IEnumerable it will not look for a component that supplies IEnumerable. Instead, the container will find all implementations of ITask and inject all of them.



            Are creational design patterns useless in Dependency Injection environment ( like SpringBoot)?
            Asked 2021-Sep-01 at 02:57

            I am studying design patterns, and at one moment caught myself with an idea, that most creational patterns like Factory and Abstract Factory are not so useful in the scope of a dependency injection environment where we usually don't create objects with the new keyword but "inject" them from some context. I also understand that most probably I am wrong and I need a good explanation to make things clear.



            Answered 2021-Sep-01 at 02:57

            DI frameworks like Spring initialize and manage beans. Creational pattern can be used to create domain (bussines) objects.


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo

            You can download it from GitHub.
            You can use Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer For Gradle installation, please refer .


            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • HTTPS


          • CLI

            gh repo clone slidenerd/Vivz_Dagger_2_Demo

          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link