datatyper | Algebraic Data Type Code Generator for Java and Apache Maven
kandi X-RAY | datatyper Summary
kandi X-RAY | datatyper Summary
Algebraic Data-Types for Java. datatyper-maven-plugin is an Apache Maven plugin to generate immutable, algebraic data types for use in JDK 8 based projects.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Execute the compiler
- Generate a Java file for a data type container
- Generate the matching matcher interface
- Generate matcher interface
- Returns a copy of the original list
- Compares this data type with the specified name and fields
- Compares this data type with the specified object
- Compares this field with the specified name and type
- Matches the next separator
- This method generates a hash code for this name
- Returns an immutable hash code
- Returns a hashCode of this name
datatyper Key Features
datatyper Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on datatyper
QUESTION
I can use this code to Create the restricted data range :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-20 at 07:26The screenshot appears to show 8.4.3 Literal Value Restriction, see also OWL2 Quick Guide, Data Property Restrictions. Programmatically this looks like following:
QUESTION
I am quite new in protege. I have been able to run some of the examples like pizza.owl
or travel.owl
. I then opened an ontology that someone else created and when I run the HermiT reasoner I get the following error:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-27 at 11:59From
QUESTION
I'm trying to model a directed graph in z3, but I've gotten stuck. I've added a single axiom to the graph here, being that the existence of an edge implies the existence of the nodes it connects. But just this alone results in unsat
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-20 at 19:49Your model is unsat
because data-types are freely generated. This is a common misconception: When you create a data-type and assert an axiom, you are not restricting z3 to consider only those models that satisfy the axiom. What you're instead saying is that check that all instances of this datatype satisfy the axiom. Which is clearly not true, and hence unsat
. This is similar to saying:
QUESTION
I am having troubles understanding what might be causing the infinite recursion. There are two points that play a role in my problem
- Depending on the place of definition of the global functions
- Whether we mark the parameter as const-ref of the second function (either global or class member)
Here is the code
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-28 at 11:49You are dereferencing a const optional
, you are using const value_type & optional::operator*() const
, not value_type & optional::operator*()
.
A free function definition only looks at names declared preceding it. This is one of the reasons for having declarations of functions in headers. In the case of a member function, definitions of members see all the declarations of members.
foo(dataType& bar)
is not a viable overload. If you haven't declared foo(const dataType& bar)
before the definition of foo(const optional& bar)
, the only viable overload is foo(const optional& bar)
, which constructs a temporary optional. It deduces U
as const dataType &
, and const dataType & &&
is collapsed to const dataType &
QUESTION
I have this REST API method
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-12 at 13:13You can check parameter for @Valid
and invoke validate()
method.
QUESTION
The problem I am facing is that reasoners (e.g. Pellet) do not categorise individuals into classes whose definitions make use of a data property restriction.
I have created a minimal OWL ontology example (based on the famous pizza example) in protege 5 to illustrate this problem.
There are three classes: MarghartiaPizza, LowCaloriePizza, HighCaloriePizza. There is a hasCalorificContentValue data property. There are two individuals of the MarghartiaPizza class, ExampleMarghartiaPizza and QuattroFormaggio, with 263 and 723 values respectively as their hasCalorificContentValue.
The HighCaloriePizza and LowCaloriePizza classes are defined as those with >=400, respectively <400, value along hasCalorificContentValue.
The question is, why doesn't the reasoner infer that the two individuals belong to the HighCaloriePizza and LowCaloriePizza classes based on their values?
is there anything wrong with syntax of my class expressions in High/LowCaloriePizza or the hasCalorificContentValue?
You should be able to copy/paste the code into a file, open it with protege 5, and try running the Pellet reasoner.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-21 at 11:11Make sure the "Show Inferences" checkbox at the bottom right is checked!
P.S. The screen shot does not correspond with the minimal example sent above, but checking the box will make the minimal example work too.
QUESTION
I'm using owlapi to return the individuals of a given class. while testing the code using pizza ontology it works perfectly but when i test it on my ontology the following exception apear :
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-02 at 16:08You should add the dependency in pom.xml in your project :
First:Add the following dependency into pom.xml in your project.
QUESTION
I have this code for receiving messages:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Aug-27 at 14:43When you create the message you write the message text before DataType, but when you receive the message you expect DataType to appear before the text.
You can fix it by writing DataType before the text, like this:
QUESTION
For this string:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Nov-22 at 17:26You could use the following regular expression:
QUESTION
I am working on GoogleFit Api for daily steps count. I am getting the correct result. But when i sign out the application (In this case, app exit the Googlefit fragment's parent activity) After sign in again, i access the same fragment again, but Googlefit returns the stepsCount as zero and getting times out at result.await. Here is my Code. GoogleFitFragment.java
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-31 at 11:13What I was doing that I was creating the static object of the class in which I was making the googlefit client. In this case, when I exit the Activity, the object was not destroying and googlefit client was getting disconnected due to the enableAutoManage in onDestroy of the fragment. And as per my checks, I was not connecting to the googleFit client again.
I removed the object as static and now I stick the API client class object with the life cycle of the activity in which my fragment resides. Also I removed enableAutoManage and now connecting and disconnecting the API client by myself.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install datatyper
You can use datatyper like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the datatyper component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page