kandi X-RAY | sso Summary
kandi X-RAY | sso Summary
kisso cookie sso framework. 4、支持Base64 / MD5 / AES / RSA 算法. Apache License, Version 2.0.
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Ok for ok
- decrypt a string
- Verify data
- Gets auth token
- Decrypt ciphertext
- Encrypt string
- Sign data
- Simple test for testing
- Get the hash of a file
- Get cryptolm mappings for the given serviceType
- Get MD5 checksum for hash
- Returns the MD5 hash of the given data
- Decrypt by private key
- Override this method to modify the cookie value
- Test password
- Create a file path
- Clear all cookie in request
- Get ciphertext
- Encrypt data by private key
- Filter over http resource
- Get parameter values
- Generate key pair
- Filter over web
- Decrypt by public key
- Encrypt data by public key
- Initialize WafFilter
sso Key Features
sso Examples and Code Snippets
Trending Discussions on sso
How can we pass additional data to Client application from Identity Server 4 in response after successful authentication?
We are using Identity Server 4 as an Auth server for our application to have user authentication and SSO feature. User information is stored and is getting authenticated by an external service. IDS calls the external service for user authentication. On successful authentication, the service returns the response back to IDS with 2 parameters:
- Authorization code
- Additional information (a collection of attributes) for the user.
IDS further generates Id token and returns response back to MVC client with standard user claims. I want to pass the additional user information(attributes) to client application to display it on page. We tried adding the attributes as claims collection through context.IssuedClaims option but still I am not getting those attributes added and accessible to User.Claims collection in MVC client app.
Can anyone suggest an alternative way by which we can pass those custom attributes to client app. either through claims or any other mode (httpcontext.Items collection etc)...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-15 at 19:18
Only some user claims provided by the IDS will be passed into the User.claims collection. You need to explicitly map those additional claims in the client application, using code like:
I'm trying to choose the appropriate authentication flow for my application. I have a portal that users create accounts/login to. When they login for the first time, I want to present them with a "Terms & Conditions" form that requires a valid signature. I want to save the signed form in our database (and link to it from our Admin panel).
I don't necessarily want users to have to create a DocuSign account to sign with. In this previous question: Embedded signers from my application shouldn’t need to login @larry-k says:
If your application makes users (who will become signers) login to the app, that is a form of authentication. You can also turn on authentication options from DocuSign. Eg include KBA (Knowledge Based Authentication) in the signing request.
Here he alludes to making my App Users into Signers, but I'm not sure how this works. I don't want to use Knowledge Based Authentication, I'm more envisioning a SSO process to create a DocuSign User based on the App User information of the user logging in.
The same article suggests PowerForm as a possible solution. What happens after the user signs the form? How can I obtain the signed copies? I gather you cannot mix/match PowerForms with API integrations? I don't want to have to require an admin to login to DocuSign to collect signed forms....
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-10 at 23:00
Q: What happens after the user signs the form?
A: just like any other envelope signed with Docusign, it is stored in the DocuSign cloud for the account that created the PowerForm.
A: How can I obtain the signed copies?
Q: You can download them using the eSignature REST API. You can either do this periodically (polling, not recommend) or get webhook notifications using Connect and get the signed PDF this way.
Q: I gather you cannot mix/match PowerForms with API integrations?
A: You can do that! You can have a PowerForm and you can also have separate API integration that downloads the PowerForm signed docs into your website.
I'm trying to change the final request of this sample to access the SharePoint REST API I've added delegate permission in AzureAD and added the scope "https://microsoft.sharepoint-df.com/AllSites.FullControl" to the token request, but still getting 401...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-10 at 11:26
Copping the answer from @Hilton's comments for better visibility
Modify the consent popup with the correct sharepoint scope request. Based on the name, is request Graph SSO permissions, in particular OBO permissions. I don't think you can use SSO in this way for Teams - you'll need to explicitly use MSAL and request the permissions for your app. Depending on what you're trying to do though with SharePoint.
Actually, we use Google IdP as a SSO / SAML authentication type for our application. We have configured it to connect our users to our application and it works fine. But recently, we have also wanted to ask a reauthentication to our users for different actions that could happen during the application lifecycle.
In deeper details, when we send a SAML request to the Google Idp, we add the attribute ForceAuthn="true" in the node "AuthnRequest" and we also add a AuthnContextClassRef to ask explicitly that we want a reauthentication by credentials.
When we send this SAML request to the Google IdP, the problem is that the IdP server doesn't ask credentials to the end user and redirect directly to the application with a successful response.
Is that normal ? Does the Google IdP support the attribute ForceAuthn="true" ? I didn't find any documentation on this topic.
Here is an example of the SAML request that has been sent to the IdP:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-10 at 09:00
Official answer from Google support: "Google doesn't currently implement Single Log out/account reauthentication, for SAML authorized services. You may alternatively have the use of "session lengths"".
I'm validating AAD-SSO for TestWebApp(ASP.NET MVC) ITfoxtec / ITfoxtec.Identity.Saml2.
I confirmed login -> AAD sign-in -> Redirect to app but app still remains not logging-in.
I assigned "https://localhost:***/Metadata" as Redirect Uri.
I checked the other settings from another post. However that means the app only makes a xml file.
Tell the procedure if there's anyone who succeeded logging-in on app?
Or do I have to build new logic?
e.g. of logic) receive session from AAD and
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-10 at 07:57
https://localhost:***/Metadata is the metadata URL. AAD needs to redirect back to the applications AssertionConsumerService endpoint.
You can have AAD reading the metadata or you can configure the AssertionConsumerService endpoint manually in AAD.
I wanted to allow users to be able to log in with both username and email. I've seen similar questions, but I don't think it works well with my case and now I'm still confused as to how to make this works. I'm using passport js for the middleware, node js for backend.
Here's my passport middleware config which handles login by email:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-09 at 19:06
You just have to check if user exists in database with email or username
I would like to set up my Service Provider (SP) for SP-initiated SSO.
When the user successfully logs in, I'm expecting the IdP to POST a SAML Assertion to my SP (is this called endpoint on my SP called an Assertion Consumer Service?).
What should I expect to happen when my SP and IdP are configured correctly but the user fails to authenticate – either with their primary credentials or MFA? Will the IdP POST a failure message to my SP?
If so, what is the conventional terminology for this payload? Is it still called a SAML Assertion but containing some kind of failure syntax differences or is it a totally different type of SAML payload, called something else? Do both success and failure payloads get sent to the same SP endpoint?
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-09 at 16:32
The thing you get back from the Identity Provider is always a SAML Response. If it's a successful response, you get an assertion. If it's a failed response, you get an error message passed from the IdP... And there's no real "standard" for those responses, other than the typical SAML message formatting.
Section 3.5.6 of the Binding spec describes the expectation for the POST profile. Each profile will provide for this, but as the SP, in most situations, you'll be using this binding.
Section 3.2.2 of Core defines the StatusResponseType - effectively, the status code of response that should be sent in various situations, the status message and status detail. It should be noted that most IdPs will simply return the
urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:AuthnFailed status code, and then maybe some additional detail in the status message or detail fields... But you cannot count on more than the code.
And yes, responses will always go to the typical SAML protocol endpoint, no matter their status.
I am part of an organization that uses SSO in Github. I don't have problem to access the repository through the web, it redirects me to SSO login and that's all.
The problem started when I logged-in first to my personal repository on GitHub through Git-Bash, I did some changes and then I wanted to do changes in a repository from my organization. When I run the below command, it wrote me that I need to re-authorize the OAuth Application, but I don't understand how:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Mar-29 at 04:48
My company just enabled SSO for my Github Org overnight so was getting the same error running
git pull. I fixed this with the following steps.
- Open Credential Manager in Windows and delete the existing credential for github.com
- Re-initialise the cred manager in git bash:
git config --global credential.helper manager-core
git pulland follow the pop-up instructions to authenticate in a browser (which happened automatically for me with SSO).
After those steps git commands worked for me again.
i'm using spring security with keycloak and if i do a request on a specific endpoint with an invalid token, it looks like the token validation is done 2 times, i've also tried to implement my own authentication provider which uses the logic of the keycloak authentication provider and overrided the BearerTokenRequestAuthenticator which does the token validation but it still does the same thing..i'm not sure if maybe the problem comes from some sort of bean definitions Here are same logs where you can see that the string "Verifying access_token" appears 2 times....
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Apr-17 at 18:59
You can add JwtAuthorizationTokenFilter and call it before each request
In your security config use addFilterBefore()
For my Django application, I am trying to enable SSO using Djangosaml2 and following are the versions I am using
My saml2_settings is as follows...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-07 at 13:30
I ended up doing the following two things, then it started working for me
Downgraded the djangosaml2 and pysaml version to 0.19.0 and 4.9.0 respectively.
For HTTPS connection, added SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = True and for dev i.e. run server cases, SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = False in your settings.py
No vulnerabilities reported
You can use sso like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the sso component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Reuse Trending Solutions
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page