w3c | 360 W3C工作组 - 本项目记录 360 W3C 工作组参与 Web 标准制定过程中的各项产出。 | Web Framework library

Unfortunately doing this directly by attempting to web scrape the search results using UrlFetchApp will not work. You can use third party tools to get the number of search results, however.

I tested this out using an exponential backoff method which sometimes is able to get past 429 errors when a fetch request is invoked by UrlFetchApp.

When using UrlFetchApp to either web scrape or to connect to an API, it can happen that the server denies the request on the grounds of too many requests - or HTTP Error 429.

Google Apps Script runs in the cloud, from a set of IP addresses in a pool that Google own. You can actually see all the IP ranges here. Most websites (especially large companies such as Google) have architecture in place to prevent the use of bots scraping their websites and slowing down traffic.

Sometimes it's possible to get past this error, using a mixture of exponential backoff and random time intervals as shown for the Binance API (Full Disclosure: this GitHub repository was written by me.)

I assume that either Google directly blocks the Apps Script IP pool, or there are simply too many people trying the same thing - because with the same techniques I was unable to get any response that didn't involve entering a captcha as we discussed in the comments above and can be seen in the log of the page string.

There are many third party APIs that you can use to do this, and I suggest searching for one that meets your needs.

I tested out one called Authoritas which returns search engine indexing for different keywords. The API is asynchornous, so can take up to a minute to get a response, so a Web App solution needs to be made.

The flow I used is as follows:

• Obtain API key from Authoritas (free)
• Create a new Apps Script project to make an API call:

Using XPath, things becomes much easier:

In your code you are adding new results to the right. After some searches the new results leave the view port and you can't see them. You can remove display: flex; in .meanings to change this behavior:

I tried a lot of things and did some research, I was able to get it, posting the answer here as it can be useful to someone in the future:

If I understood correctly, at the moment there is no way to get formatted text with HTML tags without meta information that is generated by the QTextDocument using the toHtml() function. Therefore, I decided to manually do this work using the QTextCursor class.

I have a structure that provides information about tag:

It was me being stupid.

Martin Bean commented:

And who’s mandated this? Vue templates are not HTML. They’re, well, Vue templates. They’ll get compiled to HTML, so you’ll need to validate the resultant HTML; not the template that is parsed by Vue.

Which was the solution to the problem, or how you now may want to put it.

You're not escaping the T, so it's attempting to use that as a placeholder (Timezone abbreviation). The correct format would be

XdmNode.getExternalNode() will only return a result if the XDM node is a wrapper/view of an external node such as a DOM node. A node built using the Saxon DocumentBuilder is a native XDM node, not a view of an external DOM node. If you want to use DOM with Saxon you can - just build the DOM node externally and wrap it using DocumentBuilder.wrap(domNode). But note that Saxon is 5 to 10 times slower when processing DOM nodes than when using its native XDM tree model.

Ok I found by myserlf, here is the solution if someone else need :