gateway-api | Hummingbot Gateway is an open-source project | Cryptography library

 by   CoinAlpha JavaScript Version: v0.6.0 License: Apache-2.0

kandi X-RAY | gateway-api Summary

kandi X-RAY | gateway-api Summary

gateway-api is a JavaScript library typically used in Security, Cryptography, Ethereum, Bitcoin applications. gateway-api has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Hummingbot Gateway is an open-source project that integrates cryptocurrency trading on both centralized exchanges and decentralized protocols. It allows users to run a client that executes customized, automated trading strategies for cryptocurrencies. We created hummingbot to promote decentralized market-making: enabling members of the community to contribute to the liquidity and trading efficiency in cryptocurrency markets.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              gateway-api has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 20 star(s) with 12 fork(s). There are 15 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 29 open issues and 17 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 21 days. There are 4 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of gateway-api is v0.6.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              gateway-api has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              gateway-api has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              gateway-api code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              gateway-api is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              gateway-api releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of gateway-api
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            gateway-api Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for gateway-api.

            gateway-api Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for gateway-api.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Google Cloud API Gateway can't invoke Cloud Run service while using firebase auth
            Asked 2022-Apr-07 at 13:15

            I am using API Gateway with firebase JWT authorisation (so that users can use google sign in) that is forwarding the requests to cloud run services and one cloud function service.

            Here is how my API Gateway config looks like:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Apr-07 at 13:15

            With Cloud Functions, the identity token created contains automatically the correct audience. It's not the case when you invoke Cloud Run, you have to explicitly mention the Cloud Run audience

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71782426

            QUESTION

            API Gateway mapping template is not sending JWT auth claims to Lambda function
            Asked 2022-Mar-05 at 02:53

            I am having trouble sending specific JWT authorization claims information derived from the Authorization header of a request to an API Gateway REST API endpoint (with non-proxy Lambda integration). The endpoint is secured with a Cognito User Pool Authorizer with Login with Amazon as the identity provider. From the Cloudwatch execution logs of API Gateway, I can see the JWT authorizer claims:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-05 at 02:53

            Turns out I am supposed to deploy the API every time I make a change to the VTL mapping template! Just hitting the [Save] button after modifying the template does not allow the change to take effect. AWS documentation should be updated, since it is not apparent when the API should be re-deployed.

            Also, since the value of the identities key in the JWT authorizer claims is a String, I needed to make a slight modification to the above mapping template on the userId property.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71302686

            QUESTION

            APIGateway returns `Internal server error` despite adding resource based permissions for Lambda
            Asked 2022-Feb-14 at 23:52

            I built a simple HelloWorld API using a lambda function and APIGateway. I'm using Cloudformation.

            The lambda function runs fine when I run it using aws lambda invoke.
            The API runs locally using sam local start-api.

            But when I deploy it using sam deploy (after using package of course), the API returns status code 500.

            This is the log that I get when I try to test it.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-14 at 23:52

            Lambda proxy integrations should only use POST, not GET. So it should be:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71109256

            QUESTION

            AWS API Gatewat WebSocket: Request Templates body of request after transformations is missing in integration backend
            Asked 2022-Jan-18 at 13:57

            I am building my app on AWS and my app uses websocket like this:

            Frontend WebSocket client ---> AWS API Gateway Websocket API ----> Backend in EC2 instance.

            Now, in order to let my backend Express code know how to send message to a particular client, I have let it know the connectionId of a websocket client / a user. I am following these two answers:

            which have explained very clearly.

            Below is my configuration in AWS API Gateway WebSocket API:

            What I did was using Request Template, matching all incoming requests, to transform the content which will be sent to my integration endpoint as the body of the request. Eventually I want to keep the original request, while adding attributes (like Connection Id) on top of it. For testing purpose, I set the following template:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-18 at 13:57

            I have done some research on this.

            As it has been discussed in this post: AWS API Gateway Websockets -- where is the connectionID?, the accepted answers (the solution I was trying in my question above) are assuming your are using Lambda as the backend integration.

            However, I am using Express JS running in EC2 instance and VPC Link.

            In my case, the issue actually is solved by one of the upvoted answers (but not the accepted one): https://stackoverflow.com/a/65639742/3703783.

            The official documentation is here:Setting up data mapping for WebSocket APIs.

            Update

            The above method will add the connectionId to the header of the integration request, but only having the connectionId is not enough - we also need the info like username so that the backend is able to know which connectionId to use when sending message to a particular user. This will do:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70738217

            QUESTION

            AWS API Gatewat WebSocket: connection fails when not selecting Proxy Integration and use Request Templates
            Asked 2022-Jan-17 at 14:18

            I am building my app on AWS and yy app uses websocket like this:

            Frontend WebSocket client ---> AWS API Gateway Websocket API ----> Backend in EC2 instance

            Here is how it works:

            With AWS API Gateway, WebSocket API takes action set by my $connect integration. In my current configuration, I have set the VPC Link integration with HTTP Method Any on the target url. When the Frontend tries to make a websocket connection with the API Gateway, WebSocket API's $connect method is triggered and the AWS WebSocket API calls my backend HTTP endpoint /connect.

            Frontend: ReactJS / Javascript Native Websocket: In my component that uses websocket:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 14:18

            Answering myself just in case this may help someone.

            It is actually very very trivial. I have to configure templated transformations on the response received from my backend integration before sending the message through to the client!

            I configured the Response Key to be $default and with no further specifications:

            And it works.

            It seems that API Gateway's WebSocket API is really geared towards using Lambda as the backend integration.

            Using other types of backend integration, you would face many painful problems, and the AWS documents / tutorials are NOT helping at all for types of backend integration other than Lambda.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70736163

            QUESTION

            How to get the jwt payload in route authenticated by api gateway inside the function?
            Asked 2021-Oct-29 at 19:32

            I have a gateway configured for my project, and i added the security options in the route and it's works:

            My function thats generate the jwt token:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-29 at 19:32

            API Gateway will forward the JWT in the HTTP header X-Apigateway-Api-Userinfo. This header is Base64 URL Encoded and contains the JWT Payload.

            Receiving authenticated results in your API

            [EDIT: I added the example that @Vinicius wrote in response to my answer]

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69760453

            QUESTION

            How to initialize a Google BigQuery Client within a Cloud Function using the JWT of a service account passed by API Gateway to the Cloud Function
            Asked 2021-Oct-01 at 22:50

            Goal:
            I have set up a Google API Gateway. The backend for the API is a cloud function (written in python). The cloud function should query data from Google BigQuery (BQ). To do that, I want to create a BQ Client (google.cloud.bigquery.Client()). The API should be accessed by different applications using different service accounts. The service accounts have permission to access only specific datasets within my project. Therefore, the service accounts/applications should only be able to query the datasets they have the permission for. Therefore, the BQ Client within the cloud function should be initialized with the service account that sends the request to the API.

            What I tried:
            The API is secured with the following OpenAPI definition so that a JWT signed by the service account SA-EMAIL is required to send a request there:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-01 at 19:54

            Your goal is to catch the credential that called the API Gateway, and to reuse it in your Cloud Functions to call BigQuery.

            Sadly, you can't. Why? Because API Gateway prevent you to achieve that (and it's a good news for security reason). The JWT token is correctly forwarded to your Cloud Functions, but the signature part has been removed (you receive only the header and the body of the JWT token).

            The security verification has been done by API Gateway and you have to rely on that authentication.

            What's the solution?

            My solution is the following: In the truncated JWT that you receive, you can get the body and get the Service Account email. From there, you can use the Cloud Functions service account, to impersonate the Service Account email that you receive.

            Like that, the Cloud Functions service account only needs the permission to impersonate these service account, and you keep the permission provided on the original service account.

            I don't see other solutions to solve your issue.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69407879

            QUESTION

            Spring how to scale instance?
            Asked 2021-Jul-10 at 23:45

            I want to design a microservice system. I see it this way. I send all requests to the spring-gateway-api.

            Then he sends it to the service (let's call it order) But how can I dynamically increase/decrease the number of instances of the order service. What should I do if the sping-gateway-api service starts dying from the number of requests?

            How are such issues resolved?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jul-10 at 23:45

            But how can I dynamically increase/decrease the number of instances of the order service.

            Scaling(I assume you mean horizontal) can be achieved by running more instances of order your service. In simple terms, it means to run multiple instances of your docker image. reference reference2

            What should I do if the sping-gateway-api service starts dying from the number of requests?

            You can study more about circuit breaker design pattern. This type of issue can be resolved with circuit breaker.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68332136

            QUESTION

            AWS APIGateway Integration Response Mapping Templates do not switch correctly based on Content-Type
            Asked 2021-May-24 at 11:10

            I am experimenting with an AWS API-Gateway integration with an S3 backend. I have noticed the switch between different mapping-templates in the integration-response does not appear to work.

            In integration-response, I have the following mapping templates:

            application/json:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-24 at 11:10

            AWS Support confirmed to me that the switch is based on the original request Accept header. Testing this using Postman confirms this functionality.

            The test tools built into the AWS console for API-Gateway however do not appear to cater for testing response mapping templates - from AWS support: the purpose of API Gateway test console is only to test the Integration, it doesn't work for end-to-end request.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67607978

            QUESTION

            Api Gateway websocket $connect gets a 400 from the http integration point but it works for other routes
            Asked 2021-May-24 at 09:29

            I have a problem with my HTTP integration for an AWS API Gateway that uses WEBSOCKET

            These are the main characteristics of my configuration (it can be viewed in detail in the cloud formation template at the end of the post):

            • Api Gateway Websocket
            • Route selection expression $request.body.action
            • Disabled execute api endpoint because I'm using a custom domain, although it does not seem to make any difference if I use the Api Gateway direct url instead
            • Routes $connect, a send and a $disconnect
            • Integration type is HTTP_PROXY
            • The integration Uri (and here is the interesting part) is a URL that points to my custom domain, and the DNS resolves as ANOTHER Api Gateway in my AWS account (an HTTP one) that integrates with a private ALB through a VPC_LINK and reaches a web service in an ECS cluster (I guess this is irrelevant now).
            • Bot Api Gateway, the http one and the websocket one, use a custom domain api.mycompany.io and ws.mycompany.io with a TLS certificate *.mycompany.io
            • The HTTP services run in a private subnet, but they're perfectly reachable from internet. I can send http requests and get back responses.

            When I do

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-24 at 09:18

            I solved it.

            The reason it failed with the "real" http integration pointing to my service is due to some http headers.

            I reproduced the issue by accessing the cloud watch logs and viewing all the http headers that were being used in the actual http integration call, and, in PostMan, making a request to my service with exactly those headers. As expected, I got 400 Bad Request.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67640010

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install gateway-api

            Quickstart guide
            All installation options

            Support

            Chat with our support team on DiscordEmail us at support@hummingbot.io
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Consider Popular Cryptography Libraries

            dogecoin

            by dogecoin

            tink

            by google

            crypto-js

            by brix

            Ciphey

            by Ciphey

            libsodium

            by jedisct1

            Try Top Libraries by CoinAlpha

            fund-protocol

            by CoinAlphaJavaScript

            hummingbot-docs

            by CoinAlphaJavaScript

            basket-protocol

            by CoinAlphaJavaScript

            hummingbot

            by CoinAlphaPython

            hbui

            by CoinAlphaJavaScript