gateway-api | Hummingbot Gateway is an open-source project | Cryptography library
kandi X-RAY | gateway-api Summary
kandi X-RAY | gateway-api Summary
Hummingbot Gateway is an open-source project that integrates cryptocurrency trading on both centralized exchanges and decentralized protocols. It allows users to run a client that executes customized, automated trading strategies for cryptocurrencies. We created hummingbot to promote decentralized market-making: enabling members of the community to contribute to the liquidity and trading efficiency in cryptocurrency markets.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of gateway-api
gateway-api Key Features
gateway-api Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on gateway-api
QUESTION
I am using API Gateway with firebase JWT authorisation (so that users can use google sign in) that is forwarding the requests to cloud run services and one cloud function service.
Here is how my API Gateway config looks like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-07 at 13:15With Cloud Functions, the identity token created contains automatically the correct audience. It's not the case when you invoke Cloud Run, you have to explicitly mention the Cloud Run audience
QUESTION
I am having trouble sending specific JWT authorization claims information derived from the Authorization header of a request to an API Gateway REST API endpoint (with non-proxy Lambda integration). The endpoint is secured with a Cognito User Pool Authorizer with Login with Amazon as the identity provider. From the Cloudwatch execution logs of API Gateway, I can see the JWT authorizer claims:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-05 at 02:53Turns out I am supposed to deploy the API every time I make a change to the VTL mapping template! Just hitting the [Save] button after modifying the template does not allow the change to take effect. AWS documentation should be updated, since it is not apparent when the API should be re-deployed.
Also, since the value of the identities
key in the JWT authorizer claims is a String, I needed to make a slight modification to the above mapping template on the userId
property.
QUESTION
I built a simple HelloWorld API using a lambda function and APIGateway. I'm using Cloudformation.
The lambda function runs fine when I run it using aws lambda invoke
.
The API runs locally using sam local start-api
.
But when I deploy it using sam deploy
(after using package
of course), the API returns status code 500.
This is the log that I get when I try to test it.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-14 at 23:52Lambda proxy integrations should only use POST, not GET
. So it should be:
QUESTION
I am building my app on AWS and my app uses websocket like this:
Frontend WebSocket client ---> AWS API Gateway Websocket API ----> Backend in EC2 instance.
Now, in order to let my backend Express code know how to send message to a particular client, I have let it know the connectionId
of a websocket client / a user. I am following these two answers:
which have explained very clearly.
Below is my configuration in AWS API Gateway WebSocket API:
What I did was using Request Template, matching all incoming requests, to transform the content which will be sent to my integration endpoint as the body of the request. Eventually I want to keep the original request, while adding attributes (like Connection Id) on top of it. For testing purpose, I set the following template:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-18 at 13:57I have done some research on this.
As it has been discussed in this post: AWS API Gateway Websockets -- where is the connectionID?, the accepted answers (the solution I was trying in my question above) are assuming your are using Lambda as the backend integration.
However, I am using Express JS running in EC2 instance and VPC Link.
In my case, the issue actually is solved by one of the upvoted answers (but not the accepted one): https://stackoverflow.com/a/65639742/3703783.
The official documentation is here:Setting up data mapping for WebSocket APIs.
UpdateThe above method will add the connectionId to the header of the integration request, but only having the connectionId is not enough - we also need the info like username so that the backend is able to know which connectionId to use when sending message to a particular user. This will do:
QUESTION
I am building my app on AWS and yy app uses websocket like this:
Frontend WebSocket client ---> AWS API Gateway Websocket API ----> Backend in EC2 instance
Here is how it works:
With AWS API Gateway, WebSocket API takes action set by my $connect
integration. In my current configuration, I have set the VPC Link integration with HTTP Method Any on the target url. When the Frontend tries to make a websocket connection with the API Gateway, WebSocket API's $connect
method is triggered and the AWS WebSocket API calls my backend HTTP endpoint /connect
.
Frontend: ReactJS / Javascript Native Websocket: In my component that uses websocket:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 14:18Answering myself just in case this may help someone.
It is actually very very trivial. I have to configure templated transformations on the response received from my backend integration before sending the message through to the client!
I configured the Response Key to be $default
and with no further specifications:
And it works.
It seems that API Gateway's WebSocket API is really geared towards using Lambda as the backend integration.
Using other types of backend integration, you would face many painful problems, and the AWS documents / tutorials are NOT helping at all for types of backend integration other than Lambda.
QUESTION
I have a gateway configured for my project, and i added the security options in the route and it's works:
My function thats generate the jwt token:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-29 at 19:32API Gateway will forward the JWT in the HTTP header X-Apigateway-Api-Userinfo. This header is Base64 URL Encoded and contains the JWT Payload.
Receiving authenticated results in your API
[EDIT: I added the example that @Vinicius wrote in response to my answer]
QUESTION
Goal:
I have set up a Google API Gateway. The backend for the API is a cloud function (written in python). The cloud function should query data from Google BigQuery (BQ). To do that, I want to create a BQ Client (google.cloud.bigquery.Client()
). The API should be accessed by different applications using different service accounts. The service accounts have permission to access only specific datasets within my project. Therefore, the service accounts/applications should only be able to query the datasets they have the permission for. Therefore, the BQ Client within the cloud function should be initialized with the service account that sends the request to the API.
What I tried:
The API is secured with the following OpenAPI definition so that a JWT signed by the service account SA-EMAIL is required to send a request there:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-01 at 19:54Your goal is to catch the credential that called the API Gateway, and to reuse it in your Cloud Functions to call BigQuery.
Sadly, you can't. Why? Because API Gateway prevent you to achieve that (and it's a good news for security reason). The JWT token is correctly forwarded to your Cloud Functions, but the signature part has been removed (you receive only the header and the body of the JWT token).
The security verification has been done by API Gateway and you have to rely on that authentication.
What's the solution?
My solution is the following: In the truncated JWT that you receive, you can get the body and get the Service Account email. From there, you can use the Cloud Functions service account, to impersonate the Service Account email that you receive.
Like that, the Cloud Functions service account only needs the permission to impersonate these service account, and you keep the permission provided on the original service account.
I don't see other solutions to solve your issue.
QUESTION
I want to design a microservice system. I see it this way. I send all requests to the spring-gateway-api.
Then he sends it to the service (let's call it order) But how can I dynamically increase/decrease the number of instances of the order service. What should I do if the sping-gateway-api service starts dying from the number of requests?
How are such issues resolved?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-10 at 23:45But how can I dynamically increase/decrease the number of instances of the order service.
Scaling(I assume you mean horizontal) can be achieved by running more instances of order your service. In simple terms, it means to run multiple instances of your docker image. reference reference2
What should I do if the sping-gateway-api service starts dying from the number of requests?
You can study more about circuit breaker design pattern. This type of issue can be resolved with circuit breaker.
QUESTION
I am experimenting with an AWS API-Gateway integration with an S3 backend. I have noticed the switch between different mapping-templates in the integration-response does not appear to work.
In integration-response, I have the following mapping templates:
application/json:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 11:10AWS Support confirmed to me that the switch is based on the original request Accept
header. Testing this using Postman confirms this functionality.
The test tools built into the AWS console for API-Gateway however do not appear to cater for testing response mapping templates - from AWS support: the purpose of API Gateway test console is only to test the Integration, it doesn't work for end-to-end request
.
QUESTION
I have a problem with my HTTP integration for an AWS API Gateway that uses WEBSOCKET
These are the main characteristics of my configuration (it can be viewed in detail in the cloud formation template at the end of the post):
- Api Gateway Websocket
- Route selection expression
$request.body.action
- Disabled execute api endpoint because I'm using a custom domain, although it does not seem to make any difference if I use the Api Gateway direct url instead
- Routes
$connect
, asend
and a$disconnect
- Integration type is
HTTP_PROXY
- The integration Uri (and here is the interesting part) is a URL that points to my custom domain, and the DNS resolves as ANOTHER Api Gateway in my AWS account (an
HTTP
one) that integrates with a private ALB through a VPC_LINK and reaches a web service in an ECS cluster (I guess this is irrelevant now). - Bot Api Gateway, the http one and the websocket one, use a custom domain
api.mycompany.io
andws.mycompany.io
with a TLS certificate*.mycompany.io
- The HTTP services run in a private subnet, but they're perfectly reachable from internet. I can send http requests and get back responses.
When I do
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 09:18I solved it.
The reason it failed with the "real" http integration pointing to my service is due to some http headers.
I reproduced the issue by accessing the cloud watch logs and viewing all the http headers that were being used in the actual http integration call, and, in PostMan, making a request to my service with exactly those headers. As expected, I got 400 Bad Request.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install gateway-api
All installation options
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page