tortoise | Nodejs Client library for AMQP | Pub Sub library

In base R, use grepl to detect if Condition contains "TM", if so, assign "malay", otherwise assign "english". This works fine since you have only two possibilities.

You can revert the commit (leaving it in the history), create a new branch and then cherry-pick the original commit. Rewriting published history has a lot of problems, therefore I suggest to revert the changes of the commit.

Cherry-picking is required because otherwise the reverted changes will not be merged again.

1. git checkout master
2. git revert bad-commit
3. git checkout -b more-work
4. git cherry-pick bad-commit
5. Work on the new branch and eventually merge back

If you really need to get rid of the original commit (removing it from the history, not just undoing its changes), you can use an (interactive) rebase. Interactive:

1. git branch more-work bad-commit
2. git rebase -i bad-commit^ master
3. Change the line with bad commit from pick to drop (or delete it altogether`
4. Save and exit the file

Non-interactive:

1. git branch more-work bad-commit
2. git rebase --onto bad-commit^ bad-commit master

Your first code would only work reliably if you have transactions or locking involved. Otherwise, if two requests to create a user with the same email (I know that this is unlikely in this case) hit your API, then both could get DoesNotExist as a result and would executed await Users.create(email, hashed_pw). That kind of pattern is often discouraged.

Also using exceptions for control flow is also something that is often seen as bad practice.

Your second solution is fine, there is no problem with trying to create an entry and use the expectation that is emitted by postgres to tell the request that the user already exists.

The first one would be fine if you have transactions and if you have a function like await Users.exists(email=email) that returns true or false.

Personally, I would prefer the second one, because the unique constraint already does the check you want to do, but you need to ensure that you actually check if the error message you get is about the unique key for email and not about some other error.

Bahrep's comment about locking the file is a simple way to do it. But LaTeX files are not binary files, so it makes sense to allow Tortoise to merge changes if possible.

TortoiseSVN can have hook scripts as part of the working copy. Special TortoiseSVN property such as svn::startupdatehook or svn::preupdatehook is then used to execute that script. Read on "client-side hook scripts" in the appropriate documentation page. Make sure to use the %REPOROOT% variable when specifying the path.

As for the script itself this seems to be a tricky one. Maybe some tool in SysInternals toolkit can help, like Handle.exe. Maybe there is something in PowerShell that you can use.

There is also this Stack Overflow question, with promising answers. The one with PowerShell could be even more useful than the accepted one.

You can select "All branches" in the lower left or click on the branch name in the upper left and select alls branches that you want to see in the Reference Browser.

cf. https://tortoisegit.org/docs/tortoisegit/tgit-dug-showlog.html

Github Has Revoked the support for password authentication on 13 Aug 2021 and giving the below mentioned response:

With a dict comprehension to grab all attributes of hub.Image which are upper-case only:

The error message you're getting from your call to awk is because you have a blank line between awk \ and the script so it's like calling awk with no script and no arguments. If you change it from this:

Thanks to @MatsLindh for the help. As he mentioned in his comments above, the tutorial has you running pytest on the entire project instead of just the tests folder. Running directly on tests solved my issue with pytest failing. He also gave good advice on getting imports to work correctly in an IDE by suggesting to look at the pytest documentation for further integration steps.