extnd | Multiple inheritance and _super in javascript | Build Tool library

by DominicTobias JavaScript Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | extnd Summary

extnd is a JavaScript library typically used in Utilities, Build Tool, Webpack applications. extnd has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Extend is based off Jon Resig's Simple JavaScript Inhertitance blog post with the added support for multiple inheritance and AMD & CommonJS loaders. It is also lint-free and removes a superfluous check which breaks Closure Compiler. This inheritence system has been tested on large production apps for desktop and mobile. It is recommended you import extnd.js using a CommonJS or AMD loader. Otherwise Class will be added to window and you could have name collisions.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

extnd has a low active ecosystem.

It has 12 star(s) with 6 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 0 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 316 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of extnd is current.

Quality

extnd has no bugs reported.

Security

extnd has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

extnd is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

extnd releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of extnd

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

extnd Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for extnd.

extnd Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for extnd.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on extnd

Source Class and Target class extending same class mapstruct

Java CUP (Parser) produces shift/reduce conflict when Type of variable or function is user defined

QUESTION

Source Class and Target class extending same class mapstruct

Asked 2020-Sep-05 at 12:50

abstract class baseClass {
 String updateUser;
}

class A extends baseClass {
 String updateTime;
}

class B extnds baseClass {
  String updateTime;
}

@Mapper(componentModel = "spring")
public interface FLGenericMapper {
  B mapToB(A a);
}

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-05 at 12:50

I'm not sure what exactly the problem is. Do you use lombok? Do you use field mapping?

If you use field mapping your fields should be public (otherwise nobody can access them). If you make them public it works for me. Here's the code as I think it should be:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63466378

QUESTION

Java CUP (Parser) produces shift/reduce conflict when Type of variable or function is user defined

Asked 2018-Dec-02 at 07:42

My grammer needs to have user defined Type ID combinations. The problem with the code below is that it generates the following:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Dec-02 at 07:42

I presume that this is some variant of the popular "Decaf" language, often used in introductory CS courses.

It's not really clear to me why CUP only reports two conflicts, since afaics there are four conflicts in your grammar. Perhaps the version you pasted is not the version which generated the error message you included in your question.

The conflicts reported in the error message are the result of your use of right-recursion for both the list of variable declarations and the list of statements which make up a statement block.

Conventional wisdom will tell you that right-recursion should be avoided whenever possible, because it uses an unbounded amount of parser stack. Left recursion, by contrast, uses a constant amount of parser stack. That's a good rule of thumb, but most of the time the choice between left- and right-recursion will be dictated by the syntax. So, for example, if you are writing a grammar for arithmetic expressions without using precedence declarations, you will use left recursion for left-associative operators (which is almost all of them) and right recursion for right-recursive operators (such as assignment operators in C, C++ and Java).

Item lists can usually be written either way, since they will generally be collapsed into a vector rather than staying as a binary tree, so the normal case will be left recursion:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53576949

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install extnd

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: