validid | Javascript library to validate ID card numbers | Build Tool library

Question 1:

Here is the relevant doc

Gets the default TimeZone of the Java virtual machine. If the cached default TimeZone is available, its clone is returned. Otherwise, the method takes the following steps to determine the default time zone.

• Use the user.timezone property value as the default time zone ID if it's available.
• Detect the platform time zone ID. The source of the platform time zone and ID mapping may vary with implementation.
• Use GMT as the last resort if the given or detected time zone ID is unknown.

Questions 2 , 3 and 4:

The exception for EET is thrown when you use the deprecated new Date(myString) function. I am not sure about the internal working of this method. But why bother? It is deprecated for a reason.

If you want to create a date object from an input string. There are a ton of answers about this on StackOverflow already. You really don't need to use new Date(string) anyways. Here are two quick solutions to get what you want. I assume you want your date string to be formatted as java.util.Date would print it. If this is not accurate, use this link to create your own format.

1. Using java.util.Date (old and better to avoid):

You have to use switchMap in this case, so you wait for the request to finish before returning the statement. Try something like this on your routeGuard.guard.ts:

The regular expressions you wrote are ECMAScript compatible, but you selected the std::regex::extended flavor, which is POSIX ERE.

In a POSIX ERE pattern, you cannot use regex escape sequences. For example, you cannot put \] inside a bracket expression and expect it will match a literal ]. In fact, it will close the bracket expression prematuarely. The ^[^\(\[\)\],]+$ regex must be written as ^[^][(),]+$ as the ] that is at the beginning of a bracket expression is treated as a literal ] char (this is called smart placement, - must be used at the end of a bracket expression, by the way).

The easiest fix here though is to remove the std::regex::extended option and use the default ECMAScript one:

I found the fix.

Had to adjust the endpoint configuration for a particular key:

I started a blank project and got it authenticating with no other code attached and it worked. So I then put each line back fixing each DI error until I saw the error again. It was to do with services.AddIdentity which I guess makes sense as it adds login authentication stuff as well as the managers. So, this line needs to be removed, but also need to remove all references to the usermanager etc too.

One mass refactor later and have now broken the redirect to IDS, but hopefully will get it redirecting. (it's now just acting like there is no authentication at all)

System.out PrintStream is flushed automatically on println method or if \n is written. If you want to use System.out.print without writing \n, consider using System.out.flush method:

As far as I understand, ID is fixed for the class and all instances of class ClassOne share same ID - so actually ID should be not a property of the class, but some meta-information.

If so, you should create IDAttribute and mark your classes with it. You can still have ID property in BaseClass, which will fetch ID from the attribute.

Website.findOne operates asynchronously, i.e. the callback-function you passed to it, will be run once the results from the mongodb are fetched. However, node will not be able to actually process this callback, since your callstack never gets emptied due to your while-loop. If you're interested, you can find out more about this here.

One way to solve this is to wrap your Mongo-DB call in a promise, wait for it to resolve, then return if the ID is unique and continue by calling it recursively otherwise (note that this can be highly simplified by using async/await but for understanding how this works using promised are beneficial imo):

This is a bit of a strange question for Stack Overflow, since you're asking a "why" question that only the creators of the technology could answer rather than a "how to" question that any user of the technology could answer. If I had to guess I'd say this was an oversight, which would imply that you should raise this as a bug. On the other hand if you think this is intended behavior then you should raise this as a feature request.

I doubt there's a "workaround" beyond expanding the templates like you've said.