fks | 前端技能汇总 Frontend Knowledge Structure | State Container library
kandi X-RAY | fks Summary
kandi X-RAY | fks Summary
前端技能汇总 Frontend Knowledge Structure
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of fks
fks Key Features
fks Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on fks
QUESTION
I am trying to migrate or Copy one database from one server to another server. Here is what I have tried so far:
- I used the SQL Server wizard to Migrate (Under the tasks) and it works fine except that I did not see an option to move the PKs and FKs with that . (Please let me know If I could do it)
- I tried to generate the Script with PKs and FKs but the file size is around 10GB.
Because the file is too large I use "
sqlcmd -S -i C:\.sql
" in CMD but it does not show the process.
So my question is, What is the best way to migrate or copy the database to another server with the Keys?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 21:17Backup the database on server 1.
Move the backup file to server 2.
Restore the database on server 2.
QUESTION
Using EF Core 5.0, I have a PK-less entity (from a SQL view) OrderInfo
, which has a column OrderDetailId
. I also have an entity DiscountOrder
which a PK from the columns OrderDetailId
and DiscountId
.
I would like to create a navigation property from Order
to DiscountOrders
. Such as:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 05:59Keyless entities (entity without key) cannot be principal of a relationship, because there is no key to be referenced by the FK property of the dependent.
Note that by EF Core terminology key is primary key. There are also alternate (unique) keys, but EF Core does not enable them for keyless types.
So basically HasNoKey()
disables alternate keys and relationships to that entity. Just the exception is unhandled, hence not user friendly. For instance, if you try to predefine the alternate key referenced by .HasPrincipalKey(o => o.OrderDetailId)
in advance
QUESTION
I'm trying to generate some data for testing by duplicating existing data in my database. There are a number of tables linked by FKs and I want to keep the same data profile. I think it's easiest to explain with an example:
CustomerID Name Age 1 Fred 20 2 Bob 30 3 Joe 40 InvoiceID CustomerID Date 1 1 2020-01-01 2 2 2020-02-02 3 2 2020-03-03 4 3 2020-04-04 LineItemID InvoiceID Item Price Qty 1 1 Apples 1.5 5 2 2 Oranges 2 3 3 2 Peaches 2.5 6 4 3 Grapes 3 10 5 4 Pineapple 5 1I want to duplicate all the customers who are older than 18, including all of their linked data. So for the Customers table it's easy enough to do something like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 15:52You can use the OUTPUT
clause:
QUESTION
I am trying to configure a relationship between to entities in EFCore: Square
and Position
. Position has one (position) to many (squares) relationship with square named squares
, as well as two one - to - one relationship between Square
named enPassentTakablePawnOfWhite
and enPassentTakablePawnOfBlack
. Note that both the FKs as well as the PKs in both of the entities are shadow properties:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 17:58The BoardId
is clearly defined in your PositionTypeConfiguration
class. If you don't need it just remove builder.Property("BoardId");
from PositionTypeConfiguration
.
Now about the PositionId1
, PositionId
issue.
You use this line to create a foreign key
QUESTION
As I found out to my surprise MySQL allows FKs to non-unique columns. I am not sure if this applies to other databases as well and always thought the FK had to be unique - otherwise, how do we know the parent row of a child - but looks like that is not the case. Here is a fiddle that illustrates this. We first create 3 tables:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 19:04A foreign key relationship is not defining a "parent" relationship. It is simply saying that a combination of key values is present in another table.
In practice and in the definition of SQL, the referenced value should be unique (and preferably a primary key). This is required in almost all databases.
MySQL extends this definition to allow any indexed columns.
QUESTION
I want to turn off ALL (or at least most of) conventions in Entity Framework Core (and I am talking about EF Core 5 or above) and then build the whole model "by hands".
One may wonder why.
Here is why: I have a task to migrate several large legacy databases from Entity Framework 6 (EF
) to Entity Framework Core 5 (EFC
). This involves many hundreds of tables and several databases. Some of these databases are created using a Code First approach and some are just third party databases, which we need to query and update from C# code. For the latter databases we must match their schema exactly.
Due to the size of the problem both EF
and EFC
flavors of the code must coexist for, let's say, several months. This can be easily achieved by using conditional compilation (see below).
Most likely anything that is not supported or is inconveniently supported in EFC
in comparison to EF
(or was "hacked" into EF
models), like spatial indexes, multi-column KeyAttribute
PKs, multi-column ForeignKeyAttribute
FKs, self-referencing multiple times tables, multiple indexes defined on the same columns (some are filters and some are just regular indexes), and so on and so forth is there.
That's fine. I can easily deal with EFC
inability to deal with that by "overriding" the attributes using conditional compilation, e.g.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 08:18It's possible by building the IModel
by hand
QUESTION
Situation:
- Code First C# Azure Function for Posting a new Activity
- Activity has Id, Helper and Round. Last two are also entities, ie FKs
- Database is Azure SQL
- Whilst I can Post new Helpers and Rounds, when posting a new Activity using existing Helper and Round... I'm Getting this error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-04 at 05:50Okay so looking at the code the issue you have is that ef does not recognize the helper (and the rounds) attached as entities already in database but instead sees them as new entities that need to be created.
You can solve this by attaching the Round and the Helper you deserialized from the api call.
QUESTION
I have the following models:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-19 at 05:31Django calls contribute_to_class
for every attribute if this method is defined. Note that your class does not need to inherit from models.Field
(tested in django 3.1.7 - though I didn't find any confirmation for it in documentation, so it may be an implementation detail):
QUESTION
How do I get the first X distinct combinations of an Oracle SQL CROSS JOIN such that: if a row with values (a, b)
exists, there are no other columns within X that repeat a
or b
?
In my example, I have two tables with 1000 * 1000 = 1,000,000
combinations - but I only want the first 500 unique pairs. These seem to occur at ROWNUM = 1, 1001, 2001, 3001, etc.
I have a Customers and Books table - and I want to generate 500 random book sales [a table which references both customers/books as FKs] such that there are 500 unique customers, and 500 unique books. I have done a cross join of Customers to Books, but this gives a cartesian product of all book/customer combinations. How do I get 500 unique customers, and 500 unique books?
Thanks.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-29 at 02:34You could use analytic functions here. In the approach below, I am retaining the "first" b
record for every group of a
records having the same value:
QUESTION
I have very interesting scenario and I really am looking for any idea on how to proceed. I have schema with around 60 tables. I want find a way to order the tables based on their FKs connections to determine their creation order. What I mean is
I'm providing very simple example of what I try to achieve.
We have table USERS
with columns id
,role_id
, tableROLES
with columns id
and name
and table TASKS
with columns id
, user_id
and name
.
USERS.user_id
is a FK to ROLES.id
and TASKS.user_id
is a FK to USERS.id
So when creating the schema the creation order of tables should be 1st ROLES
, 2nd USERS
and 3rd TASKS
, to be able to add FK constraints by the time of creation without table altering.
Is there a tool or maybe some idea of SQL query which can give me that picture, because for 3 tables it's relatively easy, but for 60 tables with a lot of FK connections this will be a nightmare. Thanks in advance. The database I am using is SQL server.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-23 at 09:56See if this works.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install fks
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page