Spilled | Detects exploitable storage of private info in cookies | Security library

What exactly happens when a child process (created by child_process.fork()) in Node sends a message to its parent (process.send()) before the parent has an event handler for the message (child.on("message",...))? (It seems, at least, like there must be some kind of buffer.)

First off, the fact that a message arrived from another process goes into the nodejs event queue. It won't be processed until the current nodejs code finishes whatever it was doing and returns control back to the event loop so that it can process the next event in the event queue. If that moment arrives before there is any listener for that incoming event, then it is just received and then thrown away. The message arrives, the code looks to call any registered event handlers and if there are none, then it's done. It's the same as if you call eventEmitter.emit("someMsg", data) and there are no listeners for "someMsg". But, read on, there is hope for your specific situation.

In particular, I'm faced with what seems like an unavoidable race condition - I cannot install a message handler on a child process until after I've finished the call to fork, but the child could potentially send me (the parent) a message right away. What guarantee do I have that, assuming a particularly horrible interleaving of OS processes, I will receive all messages sent by my child?

Fortunately, due to the single-threaded, event-driven nature of nodejs, this is not a problem. You can install the message handler before there's any chance of the message arriving and being processed. This is because even though the child may be started up and may be running independently using other CPUs or interleaved with your process, the single-threaded nature and the event driven architecture help you solve this problem.

If you do something like this:

To use the dynamic array formula we need to use OFFSET which is volatile.

I used an Array List because I'm too lazy to go look for my QuickSort routine; and I only created a single dimension output for horizontal output.

I used the range as an argument for the function so it would update dynamically when a cell in the called range is changed.

If your range may change in size, I'd suggest using either a dynamic named range, or using a Table with structured references, either of which can auto adjust the size.

If you require a vertical output, you can either Transpose before setting the output of the function; or loop into a 2D array.

I have learned that if any of the caller saved registers (rax rdx rcx rsi rdi r8 r9 r10 r11) is used by the callee, then it has to be saved before and restored after a call instruction by the caller.

should be

I have learned that if any of the caller saved registers (rax rdx rcx rsi rdi r8 r9 r10 r11) is used by the caller, then it has to be saved before and restored after a call instruction by the caller.

Caller save registers are those that might be clobbered by any called function. You don't know for certain whether any given callee uses them, so you have to assume the worst. The caller only needs to save them if the caller is using them, however. If you're not, you don't care that they might be clobbered.

Your padding is causing this problem. You say width: 100% and padding: 5px so the overall width is 100% + 2 * 5px = 100% + 10px (5px on the left and right). To avoid that the width is increasing over 100%, you can say box-sizing: border-box. So your flex-container will have a overall width of 100%, but the padding is already calculated.

You can use border-box to prevent that borders and paddings will "spread" above your configured size (width and height).

even if the warmstart is not feasible CPLEX can use some information.

Let me use the zoo example from

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/making-optimization-simple-python-alex-fleischer/

Use ast module to convert string to list object and then write to csv using writerow method

Ex:

Merely thinking in terms of register spillage may be fine for straight-line code, but many programs contain loops. While register efficiency in loops is often more important than in straight line code, a register-spillage model makes it hard to handle situations where a value would need to be live for part of a loop near the end, and remain live until execution reaches some spot near the beginning, but wouldn't need to remain live in the middle. Under a register-spillage model, one may end up with a value being held in a register near the start of a loop, and in a different register near the end. Graph coloring would ensure that both were assigned the same "color" [i.e. placed in the same register].

OK I think I understood what you wanted. Here is a clue so that you can progress. I won't edit you jsfiddle because your code is very messy...

What you can put in your JS: