aurelia-orm | Makes working with entities and calling your Rest API simple | REST library

by SpoonX JavaScript Version: 7.0.1 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | aurelia-orm Summary

aurelia-orm is a JavaScript library typically used in Web Services, REST applications. aurelia-orm has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i aurelia-orm' or download it from GitHub, npm.

Makes working with entities and calling your Rest API simple.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

aurelia-orm has a low active ecosystem.

It has 80 star(s) with 26 fork(s). There are 9 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 0 open issues and 97 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 514 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of aurelia-orm is 7.0.1

Quality

aurelia-orm has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

aurelia-orm has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

aurelia-orm code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

aurelia-orm is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

aurelia-orm releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Deployable package is available in npm.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

aurelia-orm saves you 23 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 63 lines of code, 0 functions and 98 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of aurelia-orm

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

aurelia-orm Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for aurelia-orm.

aurelia-orm Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for aurelia-orm.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on aurelia-orm

Webpack hmr running in Production

How to Put Validation Rules in Repository

QUESTION

Webpack hmr running in Production

Asked 2018-Dec-13 at 06:57

During development of SPA, hmr works great.

However, when published, hmr should not be running. Yet it is, and it produces a stream of 404 errors. Why is this? I don't see what I am doing wrong.

When I package for production, this is the command line (I am running this from the Visual Studio Task Runner):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Jun-11 at 12:15

Please have a detailed look at the path which is throwing 404 (page not found). I guess this is often the issue with relative path.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50796397

QUESTION

How to Put Validation Rules in Repository

Asked 2018-May-12 at 18:55

I have this entity which includes the validation rules. It works. But it seems that maybe the Entity is not the best place to store such rules, because if I have a list of 100 entities, that code is run 100 times which seems unnecessary.

So it seems to me that a better place to keep the rules is in the repository. I have a repository for each entity, and it is a singleton.

But the question is how to do that?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-May-12 at 18:55

There are several kinds of validation to consider.

First is formal validation that has to be met for any entity or value to even be processed. Like "field name is required in this fieldset". Or "name must be not empty". And so on. This validation logic belongs to factories or entity/value constructors and doesn't need external calls.

Another type is checking business rules with regards to the current state of the system. For example "you cannot add routing rule that would make routing ambigous". You can put this logic inside domain services, if it involves more than a single entity/aggregate. Or you can put it in entity, provided that you call it from application layer with all needed external data at hand to make up a validation decision.

At last, there are rules at the DB level that are meant to preserve data consistency. These match naturally to DB constraints and belong to repositories.

So, in your case it seemes to be OK to put it into an entity constructor.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50308450

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network