consent | Fast , lightweight , customizable RFC 6749 compliant OAuth2 | OAuth library

You are correct that someone with access to the client_id and client_secret - and some dedication - could potentially access the resources. Do note that it also requires obtaining an authorization code from the user, which requires phishing or some other kind of - not too difficult - attack on the side. But basically impersonating the client when you have the client credentials is easy.

To prevent that, you can use techniques that are used elsewhere for keeping secrets out of the hands of rogue developers, such as:

• rotate the client secret regularly
• change the client secret explicitly on certain events, e.g. when someone leaves or a leak was detected
• use a PKI solution for client authentication (such as private_key_jwt) which does not require any changes on the Provider side to rollover the client's certificate/key, thus making the first two approaches easier (in case the client cert/key is compromised)
• use different secrets in production that in development environments and shield the secrets in production environments from people that should not have access
• etc.

You can use the Tests tab in your requests and collections to write tests that will execute when Postman receives a response from the API you sent the request to.

You can write test scripts for your Postman API requests in JavaScript(see this). There are many example in Test script examples.

For your example use this:

I needed to send mails from a gmail account that I have access to, using nodemailer. It works for a couple of days before my refresh token is mysteriously revoked, even though the account belongs to me. A google search brought me here and I had been watching for a while hoping someone would help with a solution.

As you mentioned, this seems to happen with only test/unverified apps and I'm guessing google revokes tokens for such applications in your account after a few days. After much trials and errors, here is what I did.

NOTE: This is solution is only applicable to accounts you own, otherwise you must verify your app to access other people's accounts

1. Generate a new refresh token (existing one is most likely revoked) as described in this SO post
2. Go to the security tab of your google account dashboard
3. Under the Recent security activity section, you should see a security alert for your app.
4. Click on the context menu next to the notification and click DISMISS
5. At this point you'll be presented with a dialog of options where you indicate the level of trust you have for the app. I just went ahead and said I trusted the developer/app, obviously. And that's it! The refresh token should persist after this.

I could not find anything related anywhere else. So, please, accept this answer if it works for you. It might help someone else

In-app updates works only if the current installed app version is lesser than the one in the Playstore. Until then you will not see any popup.

If you want to check whether your code is properly working or not you can use the option called Internal app sharing from developer console.

To use internal app sharing you need to build to apps one with the higher version and a normal version. For instance, if you current version code is 5 then build an app with version code 6 and upload this into Internal app sharing enable the account you want to check and you'll get the pop-up as you're looking for.

These are some answers and documentation you can folow.

1. Answer - 1
2. Google documentation
3. Google answers

For any other help please comment.

Update: This is the working code I'm using in my app for triggering updates.

There are several ways do this, but the most easiest is to simply remove the iframes altogether to prevent them from loading, then when permission is given later, restore the iframe.

https://jsfiddle.net/y8zgfn26/2/

There is no universal rule for all UE member states, however many guarantors (such as the Italian one) have stated that by reducing the identifying power of an analytical cookie, this cookie can be considered a technical cookie.

A technical cookie does not require acceptance but can always be provided

In order to reduce the identifying power of the Analytics cookie, it is possible to use the IP Anonymization (or IP masking) setting in Google Analytics hit which removes the last octet from the IP that sends (automatically) with the call to the Google servers. In this way, the user cannot be geolocated and the GA cookie is considered to be of a technical nature.

With Universal Analytics you need to add a setting to the tracking code while with Google Analytics 4 IP anonymization is the default.

If you use gtag, the code is something like this:

The problem was simple, I was setting up oidc options twice, so I was taking the bad ones, solution is to remove { options.Prompt = "login consent"; // For sample purposes. }

and then set up everything in the other options

Make it more detailed. You can say something like This identifier will be used to collect Crash Data and in-app activity in order to improve functionalities and user engagement. Or something alike.

In your String you only make reference to Crashlytics but you're missing reference toAnalytics.

It is possible that Apple answers back saying something like they didn't find the Alert in your app after doing the correction of the String. If that happens, you just have to answer them that the alert only shows once per device (if so), and the class where you display the alert (commonly used in the AppDelegate).

You need to supply the full value of the code parameter from the URL you got redirected back to.

In your example, this would be 4/LONG_STRING.

The code began code=4/0AY0 and the / threw me!

The slash should actually be URL-encoded, but if you look at this in the browser address bar, it depends on the browser (/settings), whether it will show it already decoded again there. But in a real implementation you don’t have to worry about that much, because the step they are asking you to perform manually here, will be automated anyway, so it will just be fetched via $_GET['code'] and then passed to the fetchAccessTokenWithAuthCode.