perfectionist | - Beautify CSS files | Code Quality library

Firstly you missed "AND". Secondly to make a bit nicer use "Select Case"

Example: Message box with Timestamp

I think you can try this way:

1. Calculate/Simulate text and check the message is overlapping the timestamp.
2. If it overlaps, add \n to change the line. Otherwise, return the original one.

You need the following things:

1. LayoutBuilder: BoxConstraint above the text widget
2. TextPainter: Simulate the layout (also need the TextStyle, textWidthBasis or there may affect the layout result)

Here is the code:

The solution to this problem is to add this line of code:

Are you looking for Paragraph.longestLine property?

Just remove the bracket around the people1 and it'll work fine.

This is basically Fizzbuzz where you should print FizzBuzz if it is dividable by both 5 and 3, Fizz if it is dividable by 5 but not 3 and Buzz if it is dividable by 3 but not 5.

There is no "right" way to do this. No matter how you do it you will break some best practices.

Note!

I'm the kind of programmer who prefers a flexible approach to best practices and code standards. This is not right or wrong, but the whole following text is colored by my personality. I pretty much view this test as "can you understand when to skip best practices" while other people would view it like "can you figure out how to follow best practices even in tricky cases". None is more right that the other.

This problem is intended to be very easy to understand, but pretty tricky to do it "nice". One thing you often will encounter in this example is duplicated code. You can quite easily build it away, but often at the cost of readability.

If I were to design a code that did what you ask, I would be perfectly happy with the solution you have provided and then move on to the next problem. It's not really worth spending a lot of time on. That is also a thing employers look at when they give you this test. Do you spend hours and days just to make sure your code follows all "best practices" even if the gain is minuscule or do you create code that works and is readable and move on as soon as it is good enough?

Some examples I have seen to avoid first checking if it is dividable by both numbers and then check them separately is concatenating strings. Something like this pseudo:

Is it possible to pass a function to a class and have it be stored so that it can be called in response to an event?

Yes, you can pass functions around like that.

In your example you just need to save the callback in the __init__ method, and then use it later.

• SequenceMatcher isn't designed for a pandas series.
• You could .apply the function.
• SequenceMatcher Examples
  • With isjunk=None even spaces are not considered junk.
  • With isjunk=lambda y: y == " " considers spaces as junk.

After toying around, I cam upon 2 problems:

1. Problem: 3 values are being printed. I am assuming this is a problem. If not, oops, you can move on to the next one. But you are logging values inthe function, but then you log the return value also. You must take away the 2nd Console.log
2. It is printing undefined. the reason is the second time you call the function, you pass no arguments. The parameter funcParameter then defaults to undefined, and is printed.