better-dom | Live extension playground

by chemerisuk JavaScript Version: 4.1.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | better-dom Summary

better-dom is a JavaScript library typically used in Utilities applications. better-dom has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub, Maven.

This library is about ideas. After some time of using jQuery I found that it's just too big, has lack of features needed and the API design is debatable. In particular live extensions was one of the main ideas that encouraged me to build a new library from scratch. Vanilla DOM also has a lot of bad parts, that I'm trying to fix by providing a JavaScript wrapper for each DOM element you use in code. This extra layer allows to abstract from legacy interfaces and to add new methods on the top of particular elements without touching vanilla DOM prototypes. So the object model used is very different from what jQuery does. Note, that the better-dom project is only about the DOM. It does not contain any AJAX or BOM helper.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

better-dom has a low active ecosystem.

It has 554 star(s) with 39 fork(s). There are 38 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 6 open issues and 39 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 129 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of better-dom is 4.1.0

Quality

better-dom has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

better-dom has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

better-dom code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

better-dom is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

better-dom releases are available to install and integrate.

Deployable package is available in Maven.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed better-dom and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into better-dom implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Creates a function used for DOM nodes .
Creates a find method for the given selector
Creates a new element implementation
Creates a function that sets the element and its descendants .
Create a new document
Return a function that traverses the element matching the selector path .
End the stream
Create a new method
Create a document node wrapper .
Buffer files from container

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

better-dom Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for better-dom.

better-dom Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for better-dom.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on better-dom

DDD, Domain Services and Events

Including user id in domain events

Domain event dispatching using Entity on DbContext.SaveChanges

QUESTION

DDD, Domain Services and Events

Asked 2019-Apr-01 at 22:51

Situation:

To work with domain events, Jimmy Bogart proposed a method for storing events in aggregates.

This, from my point of view, is a very convenient approach. However, what about the case of a domain event in the domain service?

Domain Service should not have a state (stateless). In this case, in theory, the IDispatcher event dispatcher must be injected into the constructor of such a service.

Question:

To avoid introducing into the domain service of the event dispatcher, the suggested alternative approaches are correct:

Saving in the domain service of events of the last operation. However, this will violate the principle of stateless for the domain service.
Return the list of events from the service method based on the results of the operation (in the return method or in another way, depending on the capabilities of the programming language).

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Apr-01 at 22:51

Note: that post was written about five years ago. You may want to review his more recent (and more detailed): Life Beyond Distributed Transactions: An Apostate's Implementation

Domain Service should not have a state

Right - and for this reason, it is very suspicious that you would want to assign responsibility for domain events in the domain service.

You might use a domain service to calculate events for the aggregate, but the storage would still belong to the aggregate structure itself. So that would probably look like a function (or, if you prefer, a method on the domain service) that accepts some arguments provided by the aggregate and returns events.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55463788

QUESTION

Including user id in domain events

Asked 2019-Mar-11 at 12:26

I've been working on a new document management project that uses DDD architecture. I'm new to DDD and event driven design, so it's been a learning experience.
My application is structured like this:

MyProgram.Domain
MyProgram.Infrastructure
MyProgram.App
MyProgram.WebApi

Domain has all of my domain logic, infrastructure is persistence, application is mostly commands and handlers, and the webapi is just the thing webapi.

Right now I'm working on implementing user authorization, and at the moment I've decided on using authorization handlers that will do permissions check before a command or query is executed. I think this gives me good flexibility perform complex resource-based authorization, since many of my permissions will depend on the current state of a certain entity.

So that is working out so far, I've implemented authorization in my application layer, leaving most of the user-specifics out of my domain model.

Now, the problem I'm trying to figure out is how to best include user information in my domain events, raised from my domain classes.

Example, I have a certain aggregate, let's say its document, and the document has a certain approval workflow. So when the document gets approved, I want to raise a domain event such as

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Mar-09 at 14:43

I think this gives me good flexibility perform complex resource-based authorization, since many of my permissions will depend on the current state of a certain entity.

That sounds like the authorization is an important part of the business rules and should be implemented in the domain layer. The fact that you have the need to enrich the domain events with user information is an indicator that the user should be part of the domain.

Without knowing the domain exactly I could imagine you have an invariant, something like: "A document can only be approved by the line manager of the author". You can not assert this invariant in the domain without the concept of users/roles.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55072951

QUESTION

Domain event dispatching using Entity on DbContext.SaveChanges

Asked 2018-Jul-21 at 02:53

I've implemented domain dispatching using a similar pattern here by overriding the SaveChanges method on my DbContext. I have entities with domain events that inherit a base abstract class that contains a list of domain events. I now want to enforce that the abstract class to have an Id property of a generic type.

Below is the base entity class before and after:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Jul-21 at 00:23

One solution is to keep the original class and inherit from that:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51451494

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network