excerpt | JS version of Rails ' Excerpt : Extracts an excerpt | Natural Language Processing library

I feel you may have forgot to migrate your fields in django models ? In django-storage documentation on Github, you have those snippet of code.

From:

Practically speaking yes. In all modern implementations in major OSes time_t is the number of seconds since POSIX epoch, so if time_t is larger than int32_t then it's immune to the y2038 problem

You can also check if __USE_TIME_BITS64 is defined in 32-bit Linux and if _USE_32BIT_TIME_T is not defined in 32-bit Windows to know if it's 2038-safe

However regarding the C++ standard, things aren't as simple. time_t in C++ is defined in which has the same content as in C standard. And in C time_t isn't defined to have any format

3. The types declared are size_t (described in 7.19);

You may find this GitHub thread insightful. Following it, try using:

It appears you are using react-router-dom@6 so there are no longer any route props. In other words, props.match is undefined. Reading into props.match.params then throws the error.

Use the useParams hook to access the date route param.

I think the performance issue is because of expandToNeighbors method generates 4 points all the time. It becomes crucial on the border, where you'd better generate 3 (or even 2 on corner) points, so extra point is current position again. So first border point doubles following points count, second one doubles it again (now it's x4) and so on.

If I'm right, you saw not the slow method work, but it was called too often.

See [intro.object]/8:

An object has nonzero size if ... Otherwise, if the object is a base class subobject of a standard-layout class type with no non-static data members, it has zero size. Otherwise, the circumstances under which the object has zero size are implementation-defined.

Empty base class optimization became mandatory for standard-layout classes in C++11 (see here for discussion). Empty member optimization is never mandatory. It is implementation-defined, as you suspected.

That's expected, considering the way strace is implemented, i.e. via the ptrace(2) system call: every time the traced process performs a system call or gets a signal, the process is forcefully stopped and the control is passed to the tracing process, which in the case of strace does all the unpacking & printing synchronously, i.e. while keeping the traced process stopped. That's the kind of path which increases any emulation overhead exponentially.

It would be instructive to strace strace itself -- you will see that does not let the traced process continue (with ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, ...)) until it has processed & written out everything related to the current system call.

Notice that in order to run a "trivial" sleep 1 command, the dynamic linker will perform a couple dozen system calls before even getting to the entry point of the sleep binary.

I don't think that optimizing strace is worth spending time on; if you were planning to run strace as an auditing instead of a debugging tool (by running production tasks under strace or similar), you should reconsider your designs ;-)

After some more googling, I found the solution myself:

If there is an sshd server running, gitea does not automatically start its built-in ssh server. Instead, you have to force it by adding this line under [server] in the app.ini configuration: