badssl | Connect to broken ssl servers | TLS library

 by   cjdelisle JavaScript Version: Current License: GPL-3.0

kandi X-RAY | badssl Summary

kandi X-RAY | badssl Summary

badssl is a JavaScript library typically used in Security, TLS applications. badssl has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

All of our browsers keep upgrading and banning old/broken SSL versions (this is a good thing) but thanks to the Internet of Things, we have SSL servers that never get upgraded. Some manufacturers, in their infinite wisdom, have decided to block any HTTP, thus making their broken insecure SSL mandatory for connecting to their broken devices. This steaming pile of crap will allow you to connect to any server you want by piping the data you send to an openssl s_client request which usually is able to connect to anything remotely like SSL.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              badssl has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 9 star(s) with 1 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              badssl has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of badssl is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              badssl has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              badssl has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              badssl is licensed under the GPL-3.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.
              Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              badssl releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of badssl
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            badssl Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for badssl.

            badssl Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for badssl.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Getting certificate chain from rejected connections in firefox
            Asked 2021-Mar-23 at 11:22

            I am able to get the chains well if I use browser.webRequest.getSecurityInfo inside a browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived listener during a regular https connection, but if the connection failed due to a security issue such as an expired certificate then onHeadersReceived never gets triggered.
            If I accept the bad certificate then onHeadersReceived does get triggered, but the security info does not contain the bad certificate.

            I tried looking at browser.webRequest.onErrorOccurred and browser.webRequest.onCompleted but had no luck in getting getSecurityInfo to work in those contexts

            I know the browser itself has this information because you can get it to display the certificate chain in the built in viewer (which can display arbitrary certificates in the format of url_encode(base64_encode(DER_certificate))

            Does any one know how can I get either nice certificate objects or at least the DER bytes (encoded or not, it doesn't matter) ?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-23 at 11:22

            If I accept the bad certificate then onHeadersReceived does get triggered, but the security info does not contain the bad certificate.

            This is a bug in Firefox.

            I tried looking at browser.webRequest.onErrorOccurred and browser.webRequest.onCompleted but had no luck in getting getSecurityInfo to work in those contexts

            Like the documentation says: getSecurityInfo only works in onHeadersReceived. There are two related bugs, 1499592 and 1474657, to make getSecurityInfo work with other listeners as well.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66749208

            QUESTION

            How do I handle SSL certificate error in python and selenium POM framework?
            Asked 2021-Feb-28 at 00:02

            Im very new to all this, but I've made a hybrid framework (python, selenium, pytest, page object model) for practicing automation with and kind of hit a tough one with SSL certs and how to ignore the certificate error.I'm using the https://expired.badssl.com site to test it with

            The code I've found to use is:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Feb-28 at 00:02
            caps = webdriver.DesiredCapabilities.CHROME.copy()
            caps['acceptInsecureCerts'] = True
            driver = webdriver.Chrome('./chromedriver', desired_capabilities=caps)
            driver.get(
                "https://untrusted-root.badssl.com/")
            

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66404337

            QUESTION

            Java Bouncy Castle TLS Protocol version order?
            Asked 2021-Feb-10 at 18:10

            I'm using the Java Bouncy Castle TLS library (bctls-jdk15to18-1.68.jar). When I call SSLContext.getInstance, I specify "TLS" and the BCJSSE provider:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Feb-09 at 20:57

            As the client, are all of these versions communicated to the server, and the server chooses the highest that it supports?

            The client simply tells which versions are supported (TLS 1.3 supported_versions extension) or announces the best it can do (TLS 1.2 and lower). The server then simply picks the highest protocol version which is supported by both client and server.

            If I denote a specific version SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.3",BCJSSE); and the server does not support that version is an exception thrown?

            If there is no common protocol version supported by both client and server then the handshake will fail and an exception thrown.

            I'm trying to determine why you would ever specify a version in your call, if the negotiation will automagically determine the best match.

            This will usually only be done if there is a requirement to not support versions below a specific one, i.e. support only TLS 1.2 and higher. Since TLS 1.0 is considered too weak already in some situations, this can be a real-world requirement.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66124316

            QUESTION

            How does Chrome know to provide Client Certificate when no "Client Request" is sent in handshake?
            Asked 2020-Aug-09 at 12:12

            This question has puzzled me while looking into a Mutual SSL failure between my client app and an external Server.

            When my app tries to connection to the external server's rest API - let's call it https://www.server.com/api/resolve - I expect a "Certificate Request" handshake element to be sent with their Server hello. As far as I can tell from a tcpdump of all traffic between me and the server, it is not sent. Only a "Server Hello, Certificate, Certificate Status, Server Key Exchange, Server Hello Done" is sent:

            tcpdump of TLSv1.2 handshake: https://i.stack.imgur.com/50Ous.png

            However when I try to access that same API URL in Chrome, the browser displays a box asking me to select my client certificate for mutual authentication. When I capture a dump of that handshake up to the point where the browser prompts me for a certificate, I still see no "Certificate Request" sent by the Server:

            Tcpdump of browser navigation to API: https://i.stack.imgur.com/hvOEx.png

            After selecting a certificate in Chrome, I'm directed to the site, however I see no Client "Certificate" sent in my TLS1.2 capture either.

            My question is, is there any way can Chrome know a client cert was requested by the server if that request is not sent in the TLS handshake?

            Alternatively, is it possible wireshark is lying to me? When I test against, for example: https://client.badssl.com/ which requests Mutual SSL, I see the Certificate Request right after the Server Key Exchange exactly as I should. I noticed in the TLSv1.2 RFC (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246) it notes:

            "In particular, the certificate and certificate request handshake messages can be large enough to require fragmentation."

            But this should be irrelevant to how Wireshark is displaying the TLS info.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-09 at 12:12

            There are several Encrypted Handshake Message in the packet capture after the application data. This very likely means that the server itself does not request a client certificate by default but that the certificate is only requested for specific URL.

            In this case first a TLS handshake is done without a CertificateRequest. Once the handshake is finished the client sends the HTTP request over the encrypted connection which is the Application Data in the packet capture. The server will determine that the requested URL needs a client certificate and initiate a renegotiation, i.e. another TLS handshake but this time with a CertificateRequest. But since the connection is already encrypted this renegotiation is only visible as Encrypted Handshake Message and the details cannot be seen without decrypting the traffic.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63325747

            QUESTION

            Setting up the test execution sequence in conftest.py of pytest, parametrized testing
            Asked 2020-Aug-04 at 19:01

            conftest.py:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-04 at 19:01

            If I understood that correctly now, you don't want to change the default sort order, except for the parametrized tests.
            Here is a slightly more complicated adapted version that shall do this (I tried to add enough comments to explain it):

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63249069

            QUESTION

            Pytest - how to order test execution in parametrized tests by parameter first
            Asked 2020-Aug-03 at 19:46

            I have the following parametrized test:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-03 at 19:46

            You can change the order of the items in the pytest_collection_modifyitems hook. If you put this in your conftest.py:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63221967

            QUESTION

            SSL Certificate with Incomplete-Chain, passes validation in .NET Core 2.2
            Asked 2020-Mar-06 at 21:55

            Using .NET Core 2.2, I need to recreate an incomplete chain SSL error however ServerCertificateValidationCallback gives me a different chain of certificates than I expect, with these certificates passing validation. Can someone explain what is going wrong here?

            A standalone test that calls badssl.com:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-06 at 21:55

            The .NET X509Chain class has logic to find the missing certificates from ambient system state, which is kicking in here. The only time you'll see an incomplete chain from TLS is when both the server sent an incomplete chain and the system can't fill in the missing pieces.

            SslLabs is reporting what happened specifically on the TLS connection. .NET's X509Chain considered the 2nd certificate, decided it made no sense in the chain, and threw it out, so you don't get to see it. There's no way to see the raw certificate data from the TLS messages via SslStream.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60567040

            QUESTION

            Unable to bypass insecure certificate warning with Firefox using Watir
            Asked 2020-Jan-20 at 15:01

            I don't seem to be able to ignore any certificate warnings using the Firefox driver with Watir 6.2.0. Is this unexpected behavior, or am I just not using the API properly?

            Example code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Mar-15 at 15:28

            QUESTION

            How to trust self signed certificate of badssl.com with Python3 requests
            Asked 2019-Dec-20 at 14:39
            import requests
            
            certificate = "-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----\nMIIDeTCCAmGgAwIBAgIJAIb7Tcjl3Q8YMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMGIxCzAJBgNV\nBAYTAlVTMRMwEQYDVQQIDApDYWxpZm9ybmlhMRYwFAYDVQQHDA1TYW4gRnJhbmNp\nc2NvMQ8wDQYDVQQKDAZCYWRTU0wxFTATBgNVBAMMDCouYmFkc3NsLmNvbTAeFw0x\nNjA4MDgyMTE3MDVaFw0xODA4MDgyMTE3MDVaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRMwEQYD\nVQQIDApDYWxpZm9ybmlhMRYwFAYDVQQHDA1TYW4gRnJhbmNpc2NvMQ8wDQYDVQQK\nDAZCYWRTU0wxFTATBgNVBAMMDCouYmFkc3NsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB\nBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMIE7PiM7gTCs9hQ1XBYzJMY61yoaEmwIrX5lZ6xKyx2\nPmzAS2BMTOqytMAPgLaw+XLJhgL5XEFdEyt/ccRLvOmULlA3pmccYYz2QULFRtMW\nhyefdOsKnRFSJiFzbIRMeVXk0WvoBj1IFVKtsyjbqv9u/2CVSndrOfEk0TG23U3A\nxPxTuW1CrbV8/q71FdIzSOciccfCFHpsKOo3St/qbLVytH5aohbcabFXRNsKEqve\nww9HdFxBIuGa+RuT5q0iBikusbpJHAwnnqP7i/dAcgCskgjZjFeEU4EFy+b+a1SY\nQCeFxxC7c3DvaRhBB0VVfPlkPz0sw6l865MaTIbRyoUCAwEAAaMyMDAwCQYDVR0T\nBAIwADAjBgNVHREEHDAaggwqLmJhZHNzbC5jb22CCmJhZHNzbC5jb20wDQYJKoZI\nhvcNAQELBQADggEBALW4pad52T7VNw2nFMjPH98ZJNAQQgWyr3H2KlZN6IFGsonO\nnCC/Do8BPx6BnP3PFwovWMat1VvnRRoC8lw/30eEazWqBRGZWPz6LHTE3DNBJdc8\nxz6mh8q9RJX/PAj+YYGNElTu6qj49YT0BEhMF4U+dTQ0G8y3x4WNfiu9pGqyrp8d\nAzeidMfQ/pU01PpoPTDLvRDNkmMsABNE1fXBfJxDDGwfq1xY1j23Fm6BolwZC2y7\nn19h+vMYVWbGoovrf2/ibTvtcTyfDop7gl5Yy3OncZxokFj21rUZpLgx9ea4a9z3\nFzEz5ufynq03RhHTE1eu+gDzMEF0GNhGGsKqeA4=\n-----END CERTIFICATE-----\n"
            
            import tempfile
            import os
            
            cert = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(mode='w', delete=False)
            cert.write(certificate)
            cert.close()
            
            cert = cert.name
            response = requests.get("https://self-signed.badssl.com", verify=cert)
            
            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Dec-20 at 12:39

            It turns out that self-signed.badssl.com is expired. For some reason Python3 requests doesn't trust the chain that is passed as verify arg in case there is an expired cert in it.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59424959

            QUESTION

            How to send a RestSharp request with a certificate attached in a UWP application?
            Asked 2019-Nov-13 at 08:20

            I created a .NET Core console app that performs exactly what I need: send a RestSharp request with an attached certificate. Everything works fine. Here's the code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Nov-13 at 07:38

            Out of sheer desperation, I enabled Shared User Certificates in the capabilities section of my app's package manifest. It worked! Hopefully this helps others!

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58832032

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install badssl

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/cjdelisle/badssl.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone cjdelisle/badssl

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:cjdelisle/badssl.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular TLS Libraries

            mkcert

            by FiloSottile

            v2rayN

            by 2dust

            acme.sh

            by acmesh-official

            nginxconfig.io

            by digitalocean

            v2ray

            by 233boy

            Try Top Libraries by cjdelisle

            cjdns

            by cjdelisleC

            PacketCrypt

            by cjdelisleJavaScript

            return-to-abort

            by cjdelislePython

            fixlicense

            by cjdelislePerl

            cjdnsnode

            by cjdelisleJavaScript