badssl | Connect to broken ssl servers | TLS library
kandi X-RAY | badssl Summary
kandi X-RAY | badssl Summary
All of our browsers keep upgrading and banning old/broken SSL versions (this is a good thing) but thanks to the Internet of Things, we have SSL servers that never get upgraded. Some manufacturers, in their infinite wisdom, have decided to block any HTTP, thus making their broken insecure SSL mandatory for connecting to their broken devices. This steaming pile of crap will allow you to connect to any server you want by piping the data you send to an openssl s_client request which usually is able to connect to anything remotely like SSL.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of badssl
badssl Key Features
badssl Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on badssl
QUESTION
I am able to get the chains well if I use browser.webRequest.getSecurityInfo inside a browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived listener during a regular https connection, but if the connection failed due to a security issue such as an expired certificate then onHeadersReceived
never gets triggered.
If I accept the bad certificate then onHeadersReceived
does get triggered, but the security info does not contain the bad certificate.
I tried looking at browser.webRequest.onErrorOccurred and browser.webRequest.onCompleted but had no luck in getting getSecurityInfo
to work in those contexts
I know the browser itself has this information because you can get it to display the certificate chain in the built in viewer (which can display arbitrary certificates in the format of url_encode(base64_encode(DER_certificate)
)
Does any one know how can I get either nice certificate objects or at least the DER bytes (encoded or not, it doesn't matter) ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-23 at 11:22If I accept the bad certificate then onHeadersReceived does get triggered, but the security info does not contain the bad certificate.
This is a bug in Firefox.
I tried looking at browser.webRequest.onErrorOccurred and browser.webRequest.onCompleted but had no luck in getting getSecurityInfo to work in those contexts
Like the documentation says: getSecurityInfo
only works in onHeadersReceived
. There are two related bugs, 1499592 and 1474657, to make getSecurityInfo work with other listeners as well.
QUESTION
Im very new to all this, but I've made a hybrid framework (python, selenium, pytest, page object model) for practicing automation with and kind of hit a tough one with SSL certs and how to ignore the certificate error.I'm using the https://expired.badssl.com site to test it with
The code I've found to use is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-28 at 00:02caps = webdriver.DesiredCapabilities.CHROME.copy()
caps['acceptInsecureCerts'] = True
driver = webdriver.Chrome('./chromedriver', desired_capabilities=caps)
driver.get(
"https://untrusted-root.badssl.com/")
QUESTION
I'm using the Java Bouncy Castle TLS library (bctls-jdk15to18-1.68.jar). When I call SSLContext.getInstance
, I specify "TLS" and the BCJSSE provider:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-09 at 20:57As the client, are all of these versions communicated to the server, and the server chooses the highest that it supports?
The client simply tells which versions are supported (TLS 1.3 supported_versions
extension) or announces the best it can do (TLS 1.2 and lower). The server then simply picks the highest protocol version which is supported by both client and server.
If I denote a specific version SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.3",BCJSSE); and the server does not support that version is an exception thrown?
If there is no common protocol version supported by both client and server then the handshake will fail and an exception thrown.
I'm trying to determine why you would ever specify a version in your call, if the negotiation will automagically determine the best match.
This will usually only be done if there is a requirement to not support versions below a specific one, i.e. support only TLS 1.2 and higher. Since TLS 1.0 is considered too weak already in some situations, this can be a real-world requirement.
QUESTION
This question has puzzled me while looking into a Mutual SSL failure between my client app and an external Server.
When my app tries to connection to the external server's rest API - let's call it https://www.server.com/api/resolve - I expect a "Certificate Request" handshake element to be sent with their Server hello. As far as I can tell from a tcpdump of all traffic between me and the server, it is not sent. Only a "Server Hello, Certificate, Certificate Status, Server Key Exchange, Server Hello Done" is sent:
tcpdump of TLSv1.2 handshake: https://i.stack.imgur.com/50Ous.png
However when I try to access that same API URL in Chrome, the browser displays a box asking me to select my client certificate for mutual authentication. When I capture a dump of that handshake up to the point where the browser prompts me for a certificate, I still see no "Certificate Request" sent by the Server:
Tcpdump of browser navigation to API: https://i.stack.imgur.com/hvOEx.png
After selecting a certificate in Chrome, I'm directed to the site, however I see no Client "Certificate" sent in my TLS1.2 capture either.
My question is, is there any way can Chrome know a client cert was requested by the server if that request is not sent in the TLS handshake?
Alternatively, is it possible wireshark is lying to me? When I test against, for example: https://client.badssl.com/ which requests Mutual SSL, I see the Certificate Request right after the Server Key Exchange exactly as I should. I noticed in the TLSv1.2 RFC (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246) it notes:
"In particular, the certificate and certificate request handshake messages can be large enough to require fragmentation."
But this should be irrelevant to how Wireshark is displaying the TLS info.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-09 at 12:12There are several Encrypted Handshake Message in the packet capture after the application data. This very likely means that the server itself does not request a client certificate by default but that the certificate is only requested for specific URL.
In this case first a TLS handshake is done without a CertificateRequest. Once the handshake is finished the client sends the HTTP request over the encrypted connection which is the Application Data in the packet capture. The server will determine that the requested URL needs a client certificate and initiate a renegotiation, i.e. another TLS handshake but this time with a CertificateRequest. But since the connection is already encrypted this renegotiation is only visible as Encrypted Handshake Message and the details cannot be seen without decrypting the traffic.
QUESTION
conftest.py:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-04 at 19:01If I understood that correctly now, you don't want to change the default sort order, except for the parametrized tests.
Here is a slightly more complicated adapted version that shall do this (I tried to add enough comments to explain it):
QUESTION
I have the following parametrized test:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-03 at 19:46You can change the order of the items in the pytest_collection_modifyitems
hook. If you put this in your conftest.py
:
QUESTION
Using .NET Core 2.2, I need to recreate an incomplete chain SSL error however ServerCertificateValidationCallback gives me a different chain of certificates than I expect, with these certificates passing validation. Can someone explain what is going wrong here?
A standalone test that calls badssl.com:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-06 at 21:55The .NET X509Chain
class has logic to find the missing certificates from ambient system state, which is kicking in here. The only time you'll see an incomplete chain from TLS is when both the server sent an incomplete chain and the system can't fill in the missing pieces.
SslLabs is reporting what happened specifically on the TLS connection. .NET's X509Chain
considered the 2nd certificate, decided it made no sense in the chain, and threw it out, so you don't get to see it. There's no way to see the raw certificate data from the TLS messages via SslStream
.
QUESTION
I don't seem to be able to ignore any certificate warnings using the Firefox driver with Watir 6.2.0. Is this unexpected behavior, or am I just not using the API properly?
Example code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-15 at 15:28Try this:
QUESTION
import requests
certificate = "-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----\nMIIDeTCCAmGgAwIBAgIJAIb7Tcjl3Q8YMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMGIxCzAJBgNV\nBAYTAlVTMRMwEQYDVQQIDApDYWxpZm9ybmlhMRYwFAYDVQQHDA1TYW4gRnJhbmNp\nc2NvMQ8wDQYDVQQKDAZCYWRTU0wxFTATBgNVBAMMDCouYmFkc3NsLmNvbTAeFw0x\nNjA4MDgyMTE3MDVaFw0xODA4MDgyMTE3MDVaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRMwEQYD\nVQQIDApDYWxpZm9ybmlhMRYwFAYDVQQHDA1TYW4gRnJhbmNpc2NvMQ8wDQYDVQQK\nDAZCYWRTU0wxFTATBgNVBAMMDCouYmFkc3NsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB\nBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMIE7PiM7gTCs9hQ1XBYzJMY61yoaEmwIrX5lZ6xKyx2\nPmzAS2BMTOqytMAPgLaw+XLJhgL5XEFdEyt/ccRLvOmULlA3pmccYYz2QULFRtMW\nhyefdOsKnRFSJiFzbIRMeVXk0WvoBj1IFVKtsyjbqv9u/2CVSndrOfEk0TG23U3A\nxPxTuW1CrbV8/q71FdIzSOciccfCFHpsKOo3St/qbLVytH5aohbcabFXRNsKEqve\nww9HdFxBIuGa+RuT5q0iBikusbpJHAwnnqP7i/dAcgCskgjZjFeEU4EFy+b+a1SY\nQCeFxxC7c3DvaRhBB0VVfPlkPz0sw6l865MaTIbRyoUCAwEAAaMyMDAwCQYDVR0T\nBAIwADAjBgNVHREEHDAaggwqLmJhZHNzbC5jb22CCmJhZHNzbC5jb20wDQYJKoZI\nhvcNAQELBQADggEBALW4pad52T7VNw2nFMjPH98ZJNAQQgWyr3H2KlZN6IFGsonO\nnCC/Do8BPx6BnP3PFwovWMat1VvnRRoC8lw/30eEazWqBRGZWPz6LHTE3DNBJdc8\nxz6mh8q9RJX/PAj+YYGNElTu6qj49YT0BEhMF4U+dTQ0G8y3x4WNfiu9pGqyrp8d\nAzeidMfQ/pU01PpoPTDLvRDNkmMsABNE1fXBfJxDDGwfq1xY1j23Fm6BolwZC2y7\nn19h+vMYVWbGoovrf2/ibTvtcTyfDop7gl5Yy3OncZxokFj21rUZpLgx9ea4a9z3\nFzEz5ufynq03RhHTE1eu+gDzMEF0GNhGGsKqeA4=\n-----END CERTIFICATE-----\n"
import tempfile
import os
cert = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(mode='w', delete=False)
cert.write(certificate)
cert.close()
cert = cert.name
response = requests.get("https://self-signed.badssl.com", verify=cert)
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-20 at 12:39It turns out that self-signed.badssl.com is expired. For some reason Python3 requests doesn't trust the chain that is passed as verify arg in case there is an expired cert in it.
QUESTION
I created a .NET Core console app that performs exactly what I need: send a RestSharp request with an attached certificate. Everything works fine. Here's the code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-13 at 07:38Out of sheer desperation, I enabled Shared User Certificates
in the capabilities section of my app's package manifest. It worked! Hopefully this helps others!
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install badssl
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page