minhash | Quickly estimate the similarity between many sets | Hashing library
kandi X-RAY | minhash Summary
kandi X-RAY | minhash Summary
Minhashing is an efficient similarity estimation technique that is often used to identify near-duplicate documents in large text collections. This package offers a JavaScript implementation of the minhash algorithm and an efficient Locality Sensitive Hashing Index for finding similar minhashes in Node.js or web applications.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Hash an array of words
- build reference to test
minhash Key Features
minhash Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on minhash
QUESTION
I have a dataset constructed as a sparse weighted matrix for which I want to calculate weighted Jaccard index for downstream grouping/clustering, with inspiration from below article: http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/36928.pdf
I'm facing a slight issue in finding the optimal way for doing the above calculation in Python. My current function to test my hypothesis is the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-27 at 15:03You can use concatenate:
QUESTION
I am performing a simple filter operation on a pyspark dataframe, that has a minhash jaccard similarity column.
minhash_sig = ['123', '345']
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-30 at 21:37Was able to solve the issue by upgrading the cluster to c5 2x large vs m4 large.
QUESTION
I have a list minhash_sig = ['112', '223'], and I would like to find the jaccard similarity between this list and every element in a pyspark dataframe's column. Unfortunately I'm not able to do so.
I've tried using array_intersect, as well as array_union to attempt to do the comparison. However, this does not work as I get the message Resolved attribute missing
.
Here is the pyspark dataframe that I have created so far.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-28 at 16:26the column from df2 will not be known to df1 unless you join them and create one object, you can try to first crossjoin both and then try your code:
QUESTION
As far as I understand one of the main functions of the LSH method is data reduction even beyond the underlying hashes (often minhashes). I have been using the textreuse
package in R, and I am surprised by the size of the data it generates. textreuse
is a peer-reviewed ROpenSci package, so I assume it does its job correctly, but my question persists.
Let's say I use 256 permutations and 64 bands for my minhash and LSH functions respectively -- realistic values that are often used to detect with relative certainty (~98%) similarities as low as 50%.
If I hash a random text file using TextReuseTextDocument
(256 perms) and assign it to trtd
, I will have:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-16 at 20:24Package author here. Yes, it would be wasteful to use more hashes/bands than you need. (Though keep in mind we are talking about kilobytes here, which could be much smaller than the original documents.)
The question is, what do you need? If you need to find only matches that are close to identical (i.e., with a Jaccard score close to 1.0), then you don't need a particularly sensitive search. If, however, you need to reliable detect potential matches that only share a partial overlap (i.e., with a Jaccard score that is closer to 0), then you need more hashes/bands.
Since you've read MMD, you can look up the equation there. But there are two functions in the package, documented here, which can help you calculate how many hashes/bands you need. lsh_threshold()
will calculate the threshold Jaccard score that will be detected; while lsh_probability()
will tell you how likely it is that a pair of documents with a given Jaccard score will be detected. Play around with those two functions until you get the number of hashes/bands that is optimal for your search problem.
QUESTION
I am trying to query an Elasticsearch index for near-duplicates using its MinHash implementation. I use the Python client running in containers to index and perform the search.
My corpus is a JSONL file a bit like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-03 at 21:57Here are some things that you should double-check as they are likely culprits:
when you create your mapping you should change from "name" to "text" in your
client.indices.create
method insidebody
param, because your json document has a field calledtext
:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install minhash
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page