multistream | emits multiple other streams | Stream Processing library

Try

Simply pass streams that file-stream-rotator gets you to the pino-multi-stream.

Use following

SQL Query to create database

Based in your comment I will put in this answer.

The standard MacOS file system setup also does case-folding, like Windows. That is, if you create a file ReadMe.txt and try to open README.TXT, you get the same file. This affects some Git refs: specifically, the ones that are unpacked into individual files. It does not affect the remaining Git refs. The results can be a bit bizarre. However, the really odd thing is if you got the above repeatedly. If you only saw it once, that was Git sort of self-correcting.

As for how someone created them on GitHub, that's easy enough. When you run git push you can specify, to the other Git, what name(s) you want them to create or update. For instance, git push origin master:newbranch creates a branch named newbranch in the other Git—the one over at GitHub—using the same hash ID stored in your own branch name branch. Note that your branch name never even goes over to GitHub: they only see the branch name you ask them to create or update, in this case newbranch, and a hash ID.

GitHub servers run Linux and store names in a form in which uppercase and lowercase are entirely different, so they can have a master and a Master, for instance, which your Git will try to store as your origin/master and your origin/Master. This works on your Mac when the refs are packed but doesn't work right when they're unpacked: you get either origin/master or origin/Master, but not both. If someone subsequently deletes the bogus Master on GitHub, your git fetch --prune will delete your origin/Master. If the refs were unpacked, this winds up deleting both origin/master and origin/Master since they both occupy one file. A subsequent git fetch restores the missing origin/master, after which all is good.

Exactly what command(s) the person who created the wrong-case-name branches used are not possible to say; we only know the after-effects.

Data attributes are typically how you do it.

You are trying to get the content of the text property of the element, but that is just whitespace.

To get the text of the element, just change

Suppose we have a jsonObject for this response. Now as per your json response, following code will obtain videoId:

The short answer: mplex and yamux are both Stream Multiplexers (aka stream muxers), and they're responsible for interleaving mulitiple "logical streams" over a single "raw" connection (e.g. TCP). Multistream is used to identify what kind of protocol should be used when sending / receiving data over the stream, and multistream-select lets peers negotiate which protocols are supported by each end and hopefully agree on one to use.

Long answer:

Stream muxing is an interface with several implementations. The "baseline" stream muxer is called mplex - a libp2p-specific protocol with implementations in javascript, go and rust.

Stream multiplexers are "pluggable", meaning that you add support for them by pulling in a module and configuring your libp2p app to use them. A given libp2p application can support several multiplexers at the same time, so for example, you might use yamux as the default but also support mplex to communicate with peers that don't support yamux.

While having this kind of flexibility is great, it also means that we need a way to figure out what stream muxer to use for any specific connection. This is where multistream and multistream-select come in.

Multistream (despite the name) is not directly related to stream multiplexing. Instead, it acts as a "header" for a stream of binary data that contextualizes the stream with a protocol id. The closely-related multistream-select protocol uses mutlistream protocol ids to negotiate what protocols to use for the "next phase" of communication.

So, to agree upon what stream muxer to use, we use multistream-select.

Here's an example the multistream-select back-and-forth: