xStore | Client-side stores that serialize data | Storage library

You didn't tell us the exact name of your chip but I suspect you are using the ATmega328P.

The ATmega328P cannot execute instructions from RAM. You will need to figure out how to write the code to flash before you can execute it. You might want to use a bootloader like Optiboot to write the program to flash, or you could study Optiboot to see how it works. Note that the flash is only rated for a limited number of erase/write cycles (typically 10000).

Also, your C++ syntax is wrong. To call a function, you always need to use parentheses. So you would write fGf(). instead of just fGf.

It requires an SSL connection. Try the following (works for me):

Try:

XSLT 1.0

It uses cb1.bind('<>', on_select) to execute function on_select when you change country in first Combobox. And this function changes values in second Combobox.

Three simple things to fix:

• all is designed to work on an iterable (think: "on a list"). By putting the for loop outside the all call you're cheating all out of its power. Instead, pass the entire list of interest to all and don't loop at all.
• abs and <, on the other hand, do not work on an iterable! Instead, use Python's powerful list comprehension to generate the list with element-by-element operations. The syntax difference[k:] means all the elements of difference from index k to the end.
• You have a stray break in your k loop, which is breaking the loop after the first iteration, every time.

So your k loop should look like this:

It's a well-asked question apart from the fact that you could have defined "within some range of the initial positions of the other random walks" better. I will assume that you mean some distance in x or y or some distance criterion in the x,y plane. The following outlines a solution for a distance criterion in x only, but the extension to other criteria is straightforward.

Basically you want a checking criterion at the end of you inner for-loop:

The LocalVariableSorter class has a design, which makes it very easy to use it wrong.

When calling methods defined by the MethodVisitor API on it, they undergo the renumbering mentioned in the class documentation.
So when being used with a ClassReader, the visited old code gets transformed. Since you do not want the injected new code to undergo this transformation, but to use the newly defined variable(s), you have to bypass the LocalVariableSorter and call methods on the underlying target MethodVisitor.

When you call visitVarInsn(LSTORE, 3) on the LocalVariableSorter, it gets handled like an old instruction referring to index 3 and since you injected a new variable occupying index 3 and 4, the “old variable” at index 3 gets remapped to the next free index, which is 5 (and 6). Then, when you define your next new variable, it gets index 7 and calling visitVarInsn(ASTORE, 7) on the LocalVariableSorter is handled like an old variable which conflicts with your new variable, so it gets remapped to 8.

This behavior matches exactly what the first sentence of the class documentation states:

A MethodVisitor that renumbers local variables in their order of appearance.

So while you have to call newLocal on the LocalVariableSorter to create a new variable that won’t get remapped, you have to call the visit… methods on the original, wrapped MethodVisitor to use it. When you use the subclass GeneratorAdapter, you can use its newly defined methods (those not starting with visit…) to create new instructions which don’t get transformed, but to me, this would make matters even worse, having methods for transforming instructions and creating untransformed instructions on the same class and always needing to keep in mind that the visit… prefix makes the difference. For some methods, you would still need to access the original method visitor, as discussed in this answer which deals with visitLocalVariable to create debug information for the created variable.

I'll make this into an answer since it looks like it answers your question.

The API you refer to looks like it uses a plain SSL TCP connection (not a webSocket) and you must send requests as properly formatted JSON. If you were connecting to this API, you would use a plain socket as described in the nodejs Net module.

Cannot connect to API: Should I use websocket or something else?

You should be using a plain TCP socket, not a webSocket. A webSocket is a higher level protocol that runs on top of a TCP socket. It can only connect to a webSocket server.