ng-flow | Flow.js html5 file upload extension on angular.js framework | Runtime Evironment library

I'll assume your question is only about jest and not about the webpack setup for swc.

I've never used swc myself in jest so this is just a shot in the dark, but I found a package for jest called @sec-node/jest which allows you to use a transformer like:

What you do is really not for runtime decision. The recipient() is to add a mapping to the recipient list router. What you probably need is a decision at runtime where to route the current message. For the purpose I'd suggest to look into a plain route() and its function support:

We need to breakdown the bits of the function here which needs 3 bits of info

substring(1 text to search, 2 starting position of the text you want, 3 length of text)

For example, if you were trying to return an unknown number from the text dog 4567 bird

Our function would have 3 parts.

1. body('Html_to_text'), this bit gets the text we are searching for
2. add(indexOf(body('Html_to_text'),'dog'),4), this bit finds the position in the text 4 characters after the start of the word dog (3 letters for dog + the space)
3. sub(sub(indexOf(body('Html_to_text'),'bird'),2)),add(indexOf(body('Html_to_text'),'dog'),4)), I've changed the structure of your code here because this part needs to return the length of the URL, not the ending position. So here, we take the position of the end of the URL (position of the word bird minus two spaces) and subtract it from the position of the start of the URL (position of the word dog + 4 spaces) to get the length.

In your HTML to text output, you need to check what the HTML looks like, and search for a word before the URL starts, and a word after the URL starts, and count the exact amount of spaces to reach the URL. You can then put those words and counts into your code.

More generally, when you have a complicated problem that you need to troubleshoot, you can break it down into steps. For example. Rather than putting that big mess of code into a single block, you can make each chunk of the code in its own compose, and then one final compose to bring them all together - that way when you run it you can see what information each bit is giving out, or where it is failing, and experiment from there to discover what is wrong.

If you use Lookup + ForEach actives, the Foreach Items should be:

Okay I've managed to solve this leak. The leak was caused, because I've injected my ShopAdapter via Constructor Injection into my Fragment. When injecting something into the fragment via constructor injection, you have to pass the dependency to the MainFragmentFactory. But because of this, the MainFragmentFactory will always hold a reference to the adapter, even when the fragment is destroyed and the fragment is not needed any more (therefore, requireView().findViewById(R.id.rv_shop).adapter = null wont't even make a change here).

To solve this problem, DON'T inject the Adapter via constructor injection and rather inject it via field injection.

Data Hub would render desired mapping when MarkLogic Entity Services is properly deployed: (Notice the Entity declaration in the mapped document, the key takeaway from all that equation)

https://docs.marklogic.com/datahub//flows/flow-definition.html#flow-definition__custom-step-settings

stepDefinitionName: .....Tip: If you are customizing a default step type (ingestion, mapping, or mastering), leave the value as default-ingestion, default-mapping, or default-mastering....

Once above is reviewed, please follow Data Hub best practice and correct erroneous manual Steps definitions. Below shouldn’t happen if you use Quick Start to create Flow and Steps, given your familiarity with MarkLogic Data Hub.

You can use a loop + New Step -> Search 'Do Until'

On the loop you can get the first element of the array and pass it to a new Array variable or to your new file and then use the function skip to remove the element from the main array. Do it until you reach your number of rows and then move to the next file.

Example of the Flow - let's assume you want to pass N rows:

You can just use the filter query as below to do this operaion:

It seems you are misreading the documentation. When messages are propagated they are not propagated to the parent logger. They are propagated directly to the handlers of the parent. It is not actually the case but it helps to think about it like this: propagation adds the handlers of the parent to the child logger. Since your test_logger has a level of DEBUG and the direct call to logging.debug() causes a handler with NOTSET level being added to root which is a parent of test_logger the situation is as if test_logger had this handler which will log any messages, so all debug messages sent to the test_logger will be logged by this handler.