legally | : books : Check the licenses for the NPM packages | Build Tool library

We currently use the legacy header method of authenticating with the DocuSign REST API for embedded signing ceremonies, and are looking to migrate our method of authentication to one that is fully supported by DocuSign. The signer, however, should not need to authenticate with DocuSign to sign this document. It is not a legally binding contract, but a document in which we collect information in order to perform a background check of the signer. The signature is simply for attesting that the information they have provided is accurate, and a paper or eSignature is required for this in the state of Illinois. What are our options?

EDIT: Based on similar questions I've seen here and in other forums, it seems that the documentation for this could be better. The part I was hung up on was obtaining consent for the JWT Grant authentication process. The impression is that the end user (either the signer or the sender), via the client application or service, would need to grant their consent via authenticating with DocuSign each time something needed to be signed or sent for signature. If you are using an integration such as ours, attempting to keep DocuSign as invisible as possible, this would not be an option. This is not the case. The URL constructed in Step 1 of this process is actually meant to be constructed manually, by the developer, as part of the development process, and navigated to in a browser, where the developer will log in with the DocuSign account that is meant to be used for the integration.

Note that I'm not asking about Java package naming conventions.

For example, Java does not legally allow package names to start with a number.

However, the official Java docs doesn't seem to cover the actual rules governing what can or can't be used in a package name.

What are the set of legal package names?

When the cursor's positioned in the middle of an argument list (making a method call), is there a way to bring up the method's signature with the parameter that that the cursor is on highlighted? Ctrl-space (sort of) brings up the signature, but it includes the huge search list of everything else I can legally type right there, and it's up to me to count through the arguments and the parameters to figure out which one I'm lined up on. (that popup also disappears if I try to move to the next or previous argument).

I've had this struggle with compiled code, and worse with code as I type it in. I typically type the name of the object, then a dot, and then I wait for the signature list to pop up (that filters down as I type). When I see the signature I'm after, I auto-complete with tab or Enter, and then I always end up in a struggle. NB pastes in variable names that are usually about 99% wrong, and I try to navigate the little red, comma-triggered edit boxes, hoping the signature popup will stay in view while I struggle to edit, delete (and stop thinking about) all the (semantic) errors. I usually end up botching it and loose the precious signature window that highlights each parameter as I moved through the argument list.

Any way to get that thing back (with the parameter highlighting)? And/or make the red editing boxes go away? And/or block NB from populating with all the errors?

Super thankful for any help or tips!

In the C programming language, we are given the guarantee that a function pointer may legally be converted to a function pointer of a different type and back without loss of data:

Section 6.3.2.3, paragraph 8:

A pointer to a function of one type may be converted to a pointer to a function of another type and back again; the result shall compare equal to the original pointer.

This rule indirectly guarantees that the sizeof one function pointer must be the same as the sizeof any other function pointer, since no loss of data may occur.

However, I am having difficulty finding any similar passages in the C++ standard (currently reading the C++17 standard, if that matters). There are actually few mentions I can find of any conversions to do with function pointers explicitly, but neither conv.ptr nor basic.compound really provide any similar guarantees.

My question is this: Does C++ provide the same guarantee that C does that any (non-member) function pointer may hold the value of any other (non-member) function pointer?

I was hoping to find this already asked, but the closest I could find was this similar question for C (which is not guaranteed to be the same answer as C++), and a bunch of unrelated questions about sizes of member pointers.

To emphasize: This is not asking whether it may work because a compiler supports both C and C++; this is asking whether the C++ abstract machine officially supports this same conversion.

I need to place a ListView above 2 buttons (in a Column) however I am having great difficulty in doing so, see below.

Example of what I want to achieve is a Terms and Conditions page with a list view containing text, with 2 buttons fixed to the bottom of the screen allowing the user to scroll and at any time click Accept/Decline.

Problem:

#1 & #3 is part of a scaffold template with a gradient background set. I fill in the content with a Widget, which should contain in this particular UI the ListView & Buttons.

#2 is what is causing the problem. When attempt to render the following UI, the stacktraces below show

I'm in a situation where I legally have to add a copyright notice to the top of my files and while I know how I can comment inside either template, script or style, I couldn't find documentation regarding how to do it outside these.

Based on the structure of the file, I assume the standard HTML comment () should work, and it both: a.) seems to work and b.) my syntax highlighter accepts it.

However, I'd like to be sure about it and understand how and why it works this way, I was surprised it is seemingly not covered in the Vue docs.

I am attempting to assign CSS styles to multiple HTTP divisions. The first division (#CSU) works and displays the desired CSS styles. However, the following divisions (#TAFE2021, #TAFE2020 etc) do not show CSS styles. I have attempted both internal and external CSS.

I post two files below; first file is the HTML file. Second File is the CSS file.

I would like to include the content of the StaticText elements in the confirmation email, because it is legally relevant and should be printed.

How to get this to work?

I'm using a Release version of a dll which is referenced in other project. This dll has tampering detection when debugger is running (dll is also mine, I don't plan to do something illegal) which gives false positive results when debugging.

Is there an option in Visual Studio (2017-1019) not to "debug" referenced dll, but still be able to debug code which is being developed? "Debug" means that I don't want to Step-In in this specific dll, but just to get the data from the method the same way I could get it in Release.

E.g: