proto2 | orbit-db visualization | Data Visualization library
kandi X-RAY | proto2 Summary
kandi X-RAY | proto2 Summary
This prototype visualizes how orbit-db's data flow works.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of proto2
proto2 Key Features
proto2 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on proto2
QUESTION
When I try to get file list with some rule.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 15:22I frequently use shopt
in scripts, but when you don't want to, you should explicitly test the result.
You can test for the glob string itself -
QUESTION
I'm using ScalaPB (version 0.11.1) and plugin sbt-protoc (version 1.0.3) to try to compile an old project with ProtocolBuffers in Scala 2.12. Reading the documentation, I want to set the file property preserve_unknown_fields
to false
. But my question is, where? Where do I need to set this flag? On the .proto file?
I've also tried to include the flag as a package-scoped option by creating a package.proto file next to my other .proto file, with the following content (as it is specified here):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-20 at 05:50From the docs:
If you are using sbt-protoc and importing protos like scalapb/scalapb.proto, or common protocol buffers like google/protobuf/wrappers.proto:
Add the following to your build.sbt:
libraryDependencies += "com.thesamet.scalapb" %% "scalapb-runtime" % scalapb.compiler.Version.scalapbVersion % "protobuf"
This tells sbt-protoc to extract protos from this jar (and all its dependencies, which includes Google's common protos), and make them available in the include path that is passed to protoc.
It is important to add that by setting preserve_unknown_fields
to false you are turning off a protobuf feature that could prevent data loss when different parts of a distributed system are not running the same version of the schema.
QUESTION
This is a valid protocol declaration in Swift:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-04 at 12:36Because it's not useful to have a Self
as a parameter type of a method. Suppose that you can do:
QUESTION
I have a proto file with proto2 syntax. I am trying to auto-generate C# file using the protogen. Although I can generate the file without any errors, I get an error while building the project (the C# file is part of a .Net 5 project in Visual Studio). The error looks like :
error CS0400: The type or namespace name 'Google' could not be found in the global namespace (are you missing an assembly reference?)
I have added the 'descriptor.proto' in the correct path but it does not seem to make any difference in how protogen auto-generates the C# file.
myproto.proto
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-17 at 09:16No Google reference is needed here; you have extended FieldOptions
, which is the descriptor metadata type that relates to fields. protobuf-net has an implementation of that in the protobuf-net.Reflection package, in exactly where this could be expected: Google.Protobuf.Reflection.FieldOptions
.
However! I doubt that this is going to do what you expect. In this scenario, you have defined a "custom option". Custom options aren't related to runtime instance data - they are part of the .proto DSL, and are usually used to influence code generation; in your case, it would be something like:
QUESTION
I am trying to use Protogen to create the C# classes this is my syntax
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-27 at 21:32The csharp_out parameter is a folder, not a file, and that isn't how you use proto_path (again, a folder); and it is =
, not :
- in your case you probably want:
QUESTION
I'm writing a little server that uses protocol buffer to encode some data.
TCP Socket is opened between Android Client and Python Server
Android Client sends string for processing as normal newline delimited utf-8.
Python Server does some processing to generate a response, which gives an Array of Int Arrays: [[int]]. This is encoded in the protocol buffer file:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-04 at 21:37OK, I worked this out...
In the case where you have a short-lived connection, the socket closing would signify the end of the payload, so no extra logic is required.
In my case, I have a long-lived connection, so closing the socket to signify the end of the payload wouldn't work.
With a Java Client & Server, you could get around this by using:
MessageLite.writeDelimitedTo(OutputStream)
then on the recipient side:
MessageLite.parseDelimitedFrom(InputStream)
.
Easy enough...
But in the Python API, there is no writeDelimitedTo()
function. So instead we must recreate what writeDelimitedTo()
is doing. Fortunately, it's simple. It simply adds a _VarintBytes equal to the payload size to the beginning of the message!
QUESTION
I am attempting to generate c++ protobuf classes from a large c# .net codebase. The enumeration 'NotSet' is used as a default value in many enum declarations throughout, so I have used the ProtoEnum attribute to provide a different name for exporting where conflicts have arisen. However I have found that where my exported .proto file has classes with one of these enums as a member its default value still uses the orginal name, and protoc then fails to produce C++ files without correction.
Using the following example,
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-13 at 14:06That's a bug in protobuf-net; I've fixed in in this commit, which not yet available in nuget - but note that this will apply in v3 only (I haven't back-ported the fix to the v2 branch).
QUESTION
I have a legacy application using proto2 with libprotobuf2.x. There is another application application that I would like this application to talk to with proto3.
I checked on possible solutions and the discussion in this thread says that libprotobuf3.x provides compatibility with proto2.
Does this mean that I can use the same proto(with proto2) and the same code stubs pb.h/pb.cpp generated for proto2 and just link my legacy application with libprotobuf3.x instead and it would work like a charm?
I don't want to update legacy protos to proto3 as it might require major refactoring in the legacy code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-10 at 16:47No, you can't link .pb.*
files generated with protoc
2.0 against libprotobuf
3.0.
Just like with any shared library, an increment in the major version number means a breaking API change.
Compatibility with proto2
means that Proto 2 syntax is supported (syntax = "proto2"
). Also proto3
is binary-compatible with proto2
on the wire.
I don't want to update legacy protos to proto3 as it might require major refactoring in the legacy code.
Chances are, if you re-generate your .pb
files with protoc
3 and recompile, it'll work without refactoring (the default syntax is still proto2).
QUESTION
I am using nanopb library
I seek your suggestion to resolve build issue - I am using protobuf 3.12,nanopb 0.4.2, puython3,gcc . I compiled protoc both c and python but still faced issue while building.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-24 at 10:33generator/proto/nanopb_pb2.py", line 10, in from google.protobuf import symbol_database as _symbol_database ImportError: cannot import name 'symbol_database'
It seems there may be a version conflict between protoc
version and your python-protobuf
version. Try to remove nanopb_pb2.py
, it should get autogenerated again possibly with better luck.
Considering you are using the binary package, you can also call generator_bin/nanopb_generator
, which should have all the dependencies already included.
QUESTION
Here is the .proto
file I used:
pkg/apis/workflow/v1alpha1/generated.proto
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-03 at 23:22Protobuf
It's not allowed, neither by proto2 specs (as in your example code) nor by proto3 specs.
As shown in the specs (either of above mentioned), a package
declaration follows the pattern:
package = "package" fullIdent ";"
i.e. the keyword package
followed by a fullIdent
followed by one ;
semicolon, where fullIdent
is defined as:
fullIdent = ident { "." ident }
i.e. at least one ident
followed by zero or more other ident
's preceded by .
, where ident
is defined as:
ident = letter { letter | decimalDigit | "_" }
i.e. at least one letter, followed by zero or more letters ([A-Z]
, [a-z]
), digits ([0-9]
), or the underscore _
character.
So in conclusion, you can't have a minus (dash) -
character in your protobuf package name.
Go
Additionally, as @colm.anseo pointed out, Go package names also don't allow dash -
characters either:
PackageName = identifier .
where identifier = letter { letter | unicode_digit } .
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install proto2
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page