refire | Declarative Firebase bindings for Redux and React | State Container library

A few things here.

1. I think it's redundant to use fuzzy matching AND search for the same string with different word ordering. Example, there's no need to search for 'replaced printer' and 'printer replaced'. You can set the matching score option in fuzzywuzzy to account for that.
2. I think a dictionary is a good idea, but I think you should be reversing the keys and vals, where the key is the matched term and the int is the val.

I don't think parallelization is necessary. Try something like this and let me know if it takes too long.

The easiest workaround is to either use set instead of list for a variable or add additional condition before appending to a

using set

A solution was to exploit the woocommerce_order_action as it allows new actions, then running a do_action which creates a action with the sole purpose of firing the webhook. The action name woocommerce_order_action_fire_webhook_order is made up i.e. anything_you_want works too

So, we found the solution way back, but I feel its hacky, specially because this practice was adopted from SO, as the correct way to have a subject subscribe to an observable to get all the events from them.

So:

@DelenaMalan is correct, once you receive a Stripe webhook event you should immediately acknowledge receipt by returning a 200 response and then handle your business logic like sending emails afterwards. See https://stripe.com/docs/webhooks/build#return-a-2xx-status-code-quickly

On the Label's tag property set a flag to indicate whether it's blinking or not.

The problem isn't that the function isn't firing -- resize fires continuously whenever the window resizes -- it's that the function only makes one-way changes to the DOM; it never tries to handle the case where the image is visible.

You're also losing track of which element is which: then the page is less than 500px wide, you remove the identifying classnames on both divs and replace them with '.left', so when the window resizes to a larger size, you're no longer able to match the individual elements using the original classnames. One way to fix this would be to add unique classnames (or, better, IDs) to the elements which won't change, so you can use those to identify the elements:

If I understand you correctly you want to cache responses based on their id parameter so when I make two getProduct() with different ids I'll get two different uncached results.

I think the last variant is almost correct. You want it to unsubscribe from its parent so it can re-subscribe and refresh the cached value later.

The shareReplay operator worked differently until RxJS 5.5 if I recall this correctly where shareReplay has changed and it didn't re-subscribe to its source. It was later reimplemented in RxJS 6.4 where you can modify its behavior based on a config object passed to shareReplay. Since you're using shareReplay(1, 5000) it seems like you're using RxJS <6.4 so it's better to use publishReplay() and refCount() operators instead.

I'm not sure I approve of the cheating - I'm rooting for your wife! But it's an interesting problem, so I'll overlook it ;-) .

Here's a different approach. Take all the words in dat and sort their characters alphabetically; also sort the letters in your input set alphabetically. The we can use a simple regex to find words in the dictionary that contain no more than the specified number of tokens of each letter.