iot-nodejs | Client libraries and samples for connecting to IBM Watson | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | iot-nodejs Summary
kandi X-RAY | iot-nodejs Summary
Client libraries and samples for connecting to IBM Watson IoT using nodejs
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Send information about the device .
- Transforms an HTTP response code to the server .
- start the device
- Generate UUID
- Check if value is a string
- Check if value is a number
- Check if value is a boolean .
- Check if the value is undefined .
iot-nodejs Key Features
iot-nodejs Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on iot-nodejs
QUESTION
I am running Java program on Graal JVM (graalvm-ce-java8-19.3.0), and inside that program I run JS scripts via Graal.js engine. I want to configure remote debugging connection for that JS script (not the Java program). I already found that Graal has support for that kind of debugging via Chrome DevTools protocol/standard.
Documentation explains how to use standalone Graal.js interpreter, but it also says that you can use same options in JVM by prefixing them with -Dpolyglot
.
So instead of --inspect
you need to use -Dpolyglot.inspect
:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-26 at 14:32It turns out that for remote connections Graal by default wants to use a secure debugging channel, so you need to either disable that by -Dpolyglot.inspect.Secure=false
or configure properly using -Dpolyglot.inspect.KeyStore*
switches.
As for my case that security was not needed, so my config became:
QUESTION
I've been bashing my head against this brick wall for a day now so it's time to turn to SO for help I think! I'm trying to update a project off babel v5, I'm starting off with this in package.json:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-15 at 21:02src/wiotp/sdk/application/index.js has this:
QUESTION
I'm running Debian 8 with NodeJS 6, and are playing around with the IBM Watson IoT platform: https://github.com/ibm-watson-iot/iot-nodejs
I've created a gateway in IBM, and are able to connect and publish data to it with the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-18 at 07:46Network connections are not serializable and cannot easily be shared across processes.
Instead, you should consider creating a single "master" process that maintains the connection with the IBM backend, and the clients will communicate with this master instead of with IBM directly (for IoT purposes, a common method of communication is using MQTT).
Also, what stops you from running the code that will be running in those separate Node.js processes in one single process? That would solve the problem too, as each piece of could would be able to use the connection directly.
From what I understand, you already have a single server process that accepts client messages and should relay those messages to the IBM backend. For each unique client, you want to create a new connection to the backend, or re-use a previously created connection.
You could use something like this (error handling withheld for brevity):
QUESTION
My goal is to define a new management extension in the Watson IoT Platform. I have read the following article:
https://console.ng.bluemix.net/docs/services/IoT/devices/device_mgmt/custom_actions.html
and have prepared my JSON document that describes the extension package. Using the curl
tool, I also defined this extension within the IoT Platform and all is well. In order for a device to be able to receive such new management action commands, it appears that it must also publish a message stating what actions it is willing to support. See the section in the above document titled "Supporting custom device management actions". My problem is that my device is using the Node.js JavaScript libraries ... see https://github.com/ibm-watson-iot/iot-nodejs
Unfortunately, I can't see any mechanism or exposed API that would allow me to publish a message to MQTT topic "iotdevice-1/mgmt/manage" carrying the required payload.
If I were to hazard a guess, the exposed function called manage(lifetime, supportedDeviceActions, supportedFirmwareActions)
would need an additional parameter that allows me to define the custom actions I am trying to add.
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-27 at 20:49Looks like this is not currently in the client library, but was planned for a future enhancement. Thanks for submitting a pull request with file changes to include extensions in the Managed Device Client.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install iot-nodejs
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page