simple-web-worker | An utility to simplify the use of web workers | Web Framework library

 by   israelss JavaScript Version: 1.2.0 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | simple-web-worker Summary

kandi X-RAY | simple-web-worker Summary

simple-web-worker is a JavaScript library typically used in Server, Web Framework applications. simple-web-worker has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i simple-web-worker' or download it from GitHub, npm.

An utility to simplify the use of web workers
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              simple-web-worker has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 182 star(s) with 38 fork(s). There are 5 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 6 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are 5 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of simple-web-worker is 1.2.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              simple-web-worker has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              simple-web-worker has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              simple-web-worker code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              simple-web-worker is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              simple-web-worker releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.
              simple-web-worker saves you 876 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 2004 lines of code, 0 functions and 54 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of simple-web-worker
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            simple-web-worker Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for simple-web-worker.

            simple-web-worker Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for simple-web-worker.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Why is css broken after webpack update
            Asked 2021-Mar-01 at 08:45

            I'm in charge of updating a legacy VUE project to the latest npm packages. I've succeeded in updating and getting a successful webpack compilation with no errors, but for some reason, beyond my grasp, the css stopped rendering in the browser after the updates. I would really appreciate a clue on this one. We are using SCSS syntax for stylesheets. No errors in the console.

            Thanks.

            package.json:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-01 at 08:45

            I was following this documentation, but in our specific case exchanging vue-style-loader with style-loader did the trick:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66347772

            QUESTION

            Webworker served from the local filesystem not working
            Asked 2019-Aug-11 at 16:38

            I am trying to make the web worker example from MDN to work when it is not served from a server but opened directly open from my local filesystem (via a via file:// URL)

            The example works fine when served from Apache at http://localhost/1/simple-web-worker-gh-pages/index.html but it doesn't when it is read locally at file:///var/www/html/1/simple-web-worker-gh-pages/index.html

            The developer console shows that messages are posted but there is no answer from the worker. (I tried both Firefox and Chromium.)

            How can I make it to work ?

            (There's a similar question failed to load script - Webworker (PDF.JS) , but my problem is different, as I don't see a "Failed to load script" error.)

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Aug-11 at 09:36

            Avoid developing using file:/// - you'll waste time debugging, as not everything is supposed to work there.

            In case of Worker() in Firefox, this was supported a year ago, but was apparently disabled in Firefox 68.

            See Firefox 68: local files now treated as cross-origin; is there a way to override? - if you set privacy.file_unique_origin to false in about:config, the example should work.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57442629

            QUESTION

            Is there a way to have different worker functions in one file
            Asked 2017-Feb-09 at 10:00

            Reading about web workers I stumbled across this example from mdn. The worker.js is just once simple function. So when we post a message to the worker the onmessage part is then started by the worker. In the simple example the worker just multiplies two numbers. But what if I want a worker that can also add, divide etc? Do I need to create a new worker file (e.g. worker_add.js) for each function I want my worker to run? Or what is the cleaner way to deal with this?

            I was thinking of having a string posted as first argument to the worker

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Feb-09 at 08:21

            I don't think there is a better way of doing the things you want but passing some metadata within the message itself.

            However your implementation could be easily improved. Instead of switcher, just always treat the first argument as a function name, all others are arguments to this function and the function result is directly posted back:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42131232

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install simple-web-worker

            Obviously, you don't have to call it SWorker. You are free to use the name you want!.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            Install
          • npm

            npm i simple-web-worker

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/israelss/simple-web-worker.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone israelss/simple-web-worker

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:israelss/simple-web-worker.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link