hr-stream | time heart rate visualizer to XSplit/OBS/Etc streams | Stream Processing library
kandi X-RAY | hr-stream Summary
kandi X-RAY | hr-stream Summary
Add a real-time heart rate visualizer to XSplit/OBS/Etc streams
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of hr-stream
hr-stream Key Features
hr-stream Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on hr-stream
QUESTION
I am trying to use Spring 4 Websocket and Angular 7 through @stomp/stompjs and SockJS library, however it keeps returning 404 not found, and connection to websocket keeps closing as a result.
My configuration code at Spring:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-11 at 05:48The following code runs for me!!
QUESTION
I will first start with what I am aware of, as it may be useful for the rest.
It is clear that you can instantiate SockJS with a subset of protocols:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-24 at 11:09Ok, I had to read the sourcecode of SockJS client to understand how it works. Now I do. This answer is valid, at least for SockJS 1.3.
SockJS is calculating the RTT (Round-Trip-Time) of the /info call. Then it takes this time and calculates an RTO (Retransmittion Timeout). If the RTT is less than 100ms, then it simply adds 300ms to it, otherwise, it multiplies it by 4.
The RTO is then multiplied by the number of roundtrips of each protocol, which apparently for websockets equals 2.
This is then used as a timeout starting when we open the websocket connection, until we receive the OPENED frame (Stomp CONNECTED frame). When this is timing out, SockJS is simply closing the protocol socket and trying with the next one. If there are no protocols left, it is going to retry all over again.
The whole logic sounds very data based and speculative, based on some experiments done by the team. Why 300ms? why roundtrip of websocket is 2?. And what is more surprising is that one can't really override this value in either client or server side (Server could override this value with the response in the /info call)
This effectively means, that if your Stomp server is too slow creating a queue, clients will be lost in negotiation.
Lets assume your client is not far distant from servers, then it most probably gonna fallback into the < 100ms RTT. Therefore, the client has to receive the CONNECTED frame in between 700-800ms.
I can't find another way to work around this, other than slowing down with a filter the processing of the /info call by a certain amount calculated empirically from measuring an average of our lag to our broker relay.
QUESTION
I need to send the token when the handshake happens with SockJS. I've tried many suggested implementations but the same exception is called
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-16 at 09:22Websocket's doesn't follows the same pattern in headers with HTTP. That's why, Even if you send token in header, It could not found. I had the same issue before and I changed websocket security structure.
My sample code is this:
QUESTION
I have a spring websocket chat application . in some client i get this exception and dont know why websocket dose not connect and sockjs change to xhr-stream and again dose not work ,all client have antivirus but some of them have this problem this is my stack trace and exception.when i uncheck web control in antivirus (kasper or mcafee) application work correct
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Sep-21 at 09:29After test some things i found that pace.js make this problem and main cause is not antivirus, i change pace config to this
QUESTION
I'm trying to get webpacker
working with docker
, puma 3.10.0
, rails 5.1.4
, and webpacker 3.0.1
.
I have the following config set up for docker:
Dockerfile
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Sep-14 at 11:46You need set the --listen-host
value that gets passed to webpack-dev-server
.
You can achieve this by editing the file config/webpacker.yml
and changing the development:dev_server:host:
value from localhost
to 0.0.0.0
, that should solve the problem.
QUESTION
Background: using Vertx 3.3.3 Core and Web on Java side as a server, using vertx-web-3.3.3-client.js as the client with sockjsclient1.1.2.js
Issue: I am successfully making a connection to the eventbus from the client when on my local machine or LAN. When I go through a proxy, the wss eventbus connection is being blocked (in Firefox I see "Firefox can't establish a connection to "wss://..."; in Chromium I see "WebSocket connection to wss://... failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 400", then I see "https ://.../eventbus/.../xhr_send?t=... Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status code of 500"). However, the onopen fires and I receive some data (connection downgraded to an accepted protocol?). Immediately after this, onclose fires and I have lost connection. I know that I am successfully reaching the Java vertx server because my static web and API calls are working.
Questions: I have looked through the Vertx and SockJS documentation extensively. Is there:
- Documentation on how vertx tries different transport protocols in the JS Eventbus connection?
- An example of JS Vertx Eventbus working through a business proxy?
- Another way to implement the Eventbus connection, perhaps specifying the SockJS protocol(s) to try/use? (I am trying the simplest way to create an eventbus connection, as shown in many places in documentation)
- Something I need to do on the Java side of the SockJS/Eventbus setup?
Thanks in advance for any advice/help!
EDIT 1: Adding the following code for both Java server and JavaScript web client sides. The web side is very basic (and what is failing). The Java side is using Spring for dependency injection and application config, has an Eventbus connection, one API call, and serves static web content.
The API call from client to server works, and the server sources the web contents correctly, so accessing the tool is working. However, the proxy is causing wss to fail (as expected) but the downgrade to xhr-streaming is failing (I think)
Javascript:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-14 at 19:14This error can be resolved by doing the following:
In the Java verticle, move the Eventbus handler to the top, before any other handlers. I believe the BodyHandler or CorsHandler were messing it up and causing the 500 error.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install hr-stream
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page