packfiles | npm goggles for your package : see what files npm sees | Runtime Evironment library

 by   jasonkarns JavaScript Version: 0.0.2 License: No License

kandi X-RAY | packfiles Summary

kandi X-RAY | packfiles Summary

packfiles is a JavaScript library typically used in Server, Runtime Evironment, Nodejs, NPM applications. packfiles has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i packfiles' or download it from GitHub, npm.

npm goggles for your package: see what files npm sees – tiny cli utility to list the files npm will include in its published tarball.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              packfiles has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 6 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              packfiles has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of packfiles is 0.0.2

            kandi-Quality Quality

              packfiles has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              packfiles has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              packfiles does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              packfiles releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of packfiles
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            packfiles Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for packfiles.

            packfiles Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for packfiles.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            git gc appearing to overwrite a packfile leaving open file descriptor holding reference to "old-xxx.pack"
            Asked 2021-Apr-15 at 01:13

            During debugging of a production issue, I am dealing with an application (Gerrit) that holds references to RandomAccessFiles in a cache structure.

            These files are referencing a git repositories packfiles.

            During an out of band git gc (not within the application) on a repository with no changes, it appears that:

            1. the same packfile is rewritten (same uuid);
            2. file descriptor is in the output list of lsof in the form (old-xxx.pack) but is instantly mark (deleted).

            I have been searching numerous codebases for this rename to no avail.

            My question is, could this be a filesystem quirk, if a rename/overwrite is done to a file with an open file descriptor by git gc?

            lsof entry:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-15 at 01:13

            If you do a standard git gc in a repository with no changes, this is expected. Git names its packfiles by a hash of their contents. Because Git doesn't recompute deltas for existing packs, when you git gc and there's only one pack and no loose objects, it's very likely that it will pack all the data into one pack that's the same as the old one.

            When this happens, Git still has a file descriptor to the old pack open because it doesn't close packs immediately. This is because often it's necessary to access them again, so it will try to leave them open a little while. The old pack, which is still open, is renamed to the old name, and the new pack is renamed into place; the old pack is then deleted. On a Unix system, it's completely possible to delete a file for which you have the file descriptor open; when the last process closes its file descriptor, the storage is freed.

            So this all seems completely normal for the scenario you're describing. Usually git gc is not a no-op, since additional objects are added to or removed from the pack or multiple packs are combined into one. But, if you do run a git gc immediately after running one with no intermediate changes, this is expected.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67090731

            QUESTION

            git repack: segregating by file type & configuring packs by group?
            Asked 2021-Jan-25 at 09:45

            Is there a way to tell Git to create packfiles based on file types, and to specify the delta-ification and zlib compression for those classes / types?

            I have a rather large repository, much of which is composed of image assets and translation files (.po), the latter actually being the largest fraction of the working copy and the repository data.

            • For the image assets, neither delta nor zlib compression are useful: the images are already compress (so they don't compress well under zlib) and delta compression does nothing useful when small changes tend to cascade through the compressed image (and are rare anyway, usually once the asset is committed it's either left alone forever or replaced wholesale).
            • For the PO files, while they're technically text files I would expect them to delta-compress very badly for this specific repository: the historical generator / exporter would export the translations in essentially random order so from one export to the next it's as if the entire file has been rewritten.

            As a result, when the repository is repacked I'd like to try packing the images together neither delta-compress nor zlib-compress them, and the PO files together and zlib-compress them (at the maximum possible level) but not delta-compress them. This way they ought not waste cycles on useless compression work, and should avoid polluting the compression of more "normal" code files.

            However my previous experiments in packfiles did not go well. Is there builtin support for this sort of segregation & configuration which I missed, or would I need to build the packs by hand using low-level commands or even libgit2 directly?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jan-25 at 08:46

            Alas, no: the controls available are only the following:

            • core.bigFileThreshold: files that exceed this size are not packed, merely zlib-compressed.

            • pack.island and several related settings: these set up so-called delta islands, as described in the git pack-objects documentation.

            These do not come anywhere close to what you want. (Note: there is also core.compression and two related items, but these are strictly global, not per-object.)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65881273

            QUESTION

            `git gc` without packing objects?
            Asked 2020-Oct-13 at 06:56

            I'd like to remove objects (.git/objects) from my repository that are no longer referenced by any refs, but I don't want to pack to pack files.

            I tried git gc --no-prune but it still removed all objects from my repo and left only packfiles (git count-objects reports "0 objects, 0 kilobytes").

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-12 at 21:40

            git gc is a wrapper for a whole series of smaller maintenance operations:

            • git reflog expire
            • git repack
            • git prune-packed (actually done by git repack automatically when you use -d)
            • git prune
            • any others I may have forgotten

            and git prune is the one that specifically removes unreferenced objects. Note that git gc supplies an expiry time so that git prune won't remove unreferenced objects that are still being constructed. If you have no active Git commands that might be constructing objects, and don't want to provide the gc default grace period, you don't need to worry about this.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64325625

            QUESTION

            PHP check if multiple file upload is empty
            Asked 2020-Mar-21 at 09:46

            In my code you have a choice of either uploading a file or not and if you don't it should just end the code, but if you do upload a file and select an appropriate pack name(which is a database name they created) then it is suppose to run the code and submit to file directory. But my problem is that in this line of code

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Aug-19 at 15:18
            // check and see whether is empty
                     if(!empty($_FILES['packFiles']['name'])){
            
                     foreach($_FILES['packFiles']['tmp_name'] as $key => $error){
                           $filename = file_get_contents($_FILES['packFiles']['tmp_name'][$key];
                           // check file_get_contents
                           if($pack_tmp = file_get_contents($filename) !== false){                
            
                                    $pack_filename = preg_replace("/[^a-z0-9\.]/", "_", strtolower($_FILES['packFiles']['name'][$key]));
                                         $pack_filename = strtotime("now")."_".$pack_filename;
                                        $file_name .= $_FILES['packFiles']['name'][$key].",";
                                        //Insert into file directory
                                        $dir = "devPacks/" .$userid."/".$packid;
                                        if(is_dir($dir)== false){
            
                                            mkdir($dir, 0777, true);
                                        }
            
                         if(move_uploaded_file($_FILES['packFiles']['tmp_name'][$key],$dir.'/'.$pack_filename)){
            
            
            
                                    }else{
            
                                        die("an error occurred sending this file... Pleas try again later!");
                                    }
            
            
                                    }
                     }
                     }else{
            
                //error any error message u want.
                }
            

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45596770

            QUESTION

            Writing Total Commader .WCX (packer) plugin
            Asked 2020-Jan-15 at 16:09

            I am trying to create a simple WCX plugin for Total Commander.

            I downloaded wcxhead.pas from here (it's in the help file): http://ghisler.fileburst.com/plugins/wcx_ref2.21se_chm.zip

            This is the official file linked here: https://www.ghisler.com/plugins.htm

            And created my own DLL:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jan-15 at 15:58

            The header was clearly created from a pre-Unicode Delphi time. It suppose char = AnsiChar which is not true since Delphi 2009.

            IIRC from forums, TotalCommander 32-bit is still compiled with Delphi 2 or Delphi 3, with a lot of custom RTL, to keep it small and efficient.

            If you are using an Unicode version of Delphi, try to change char into AnsiChar, and use the *W() exports with Unicode support.

            Also don't use global variables to maintain the state of the packer access: you should use the THandle value to open/close a given archive file. Two archives may be opened at the same time.

            Edit: since you are using Delphi 7, this is not an Unicode problem. But I would try

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59754726

            QUESTION

            How can git differentiate deltified pack record types?
            Asked 2018-Feb-08 at 14:29

            In a pack file there are records, which according to this post have the type stored in the header, along with some other metadata.

            Looking at the JGit source I can see the following values.

            • 0 - EXTENDED
            • 1 - COMMIT
            • 2 - TREE
            • 3 - BLOB
            • 4 - TAG
            • 5 - RESERVED
            • 6 - OFS_DELTA
            • 7 - REF_DELTA

            However, if the object is deltified then the type in the header will be set to 6 or 7, and after that there seems to be no added header showing the type of the payload, just some method of getting the original and then the delta data.

            How can git tell the type of a deltified pack record, so that it doesn't mix up types?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Feb-08 at 14:29

            By design, Git does not store deltas of objects of different types. You can find confirmation of this in lengthy description/discussion provided with Git source code in file Documentation/technical/pack-heuristics.txt.

            (…) What this means is:

            • we do not delta different object types.
            • (… )

            Therefore it follows, that you can infer object type either from:

            • REF_DELTA: object referenced by first 20-bytes of pack file entry
            • OFS_DELTA: object occupying position earlier in a pack (more details in Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48687264

            QUESTION

            git use up space even when file is unstaged
            Asked 2017-Nov-09 at 05:50

            I wanted to use git-lfs to add a large binary into my git repository but that failed:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Nov-09 at 05:04

            Use below commands. It will remove loose objects from .git

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47193844

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install packfiles

            Install locally as a devDependency and run through an npm script or via npx:.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            Install
          • npm

            npm i packfiles

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/jasonkarns/packfiles.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone jasonkarns/packfiles

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:jasonkarns/packfiles.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link