selfsigned | Generate self-signed certificates from node.js | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | selfsigned Summary
kandi X-RAY | selfsigned Summary
Generate a self signed x509 certificate from node.js.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Convert a hexadecimal string to a positive integer .
- Calculate the algorithm for the given key
selfsigned Key Features
selfsigned Examples and Code Snippets
New-AzureRmKeyVault -VaultName $KeyVaultName -ResourceGroupName $ResourceGroup -Location $Location -sku standard -EnabledForDeployment
#Creates a new selfsigned cert and exports a pfx cert to a directory on disk
$NewCert = New-SelfSigned
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on selfsigned
QUESTION
To get Edge to trust the localhost development server, I created a selfsigned certificate following this tutorial. I just replaced all instances of client-1.local by localhost.
So in short, I created a trusted authority by creating a .pem-file with the commands
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 19:14What am I missing for MS Edge? I
The certificate does not contain any subject alternative names, which makes it invalid for Edge and Chrome. There is an attempt to specify these information, but the attempt is wrong.
I created a selfsigned certificate following this tutorial.
Looks like this tutorial is broken.
openssl x509 -req ... -extensions "authorityKeyIdentifier ... subjectAltName=DNA:localhost"
The -extension
command line option is used to give the name of an extension section in a configuration file and not the extensions itself. Additionally the subjectAltName
should be DNS:...
not DNA:...
.
To fix create an extension file my.ext
which includes the extensions you want to use:
QUESTION
I've updated angular cli and created a new project, with routing and scss.
When I run npm install i see:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-10 at 11:25I'm afraid you just have to put up with the vulnerabilities. Angular has a very strict set of dependencies, and in changing the versions of those dependencies you've broken your app.
Make sure you keep updating your Angular project as often as is feasible, as the Angular team regularly update Angular's dependencies to mitigate these issues.
QUESTION
I am following the devops guy tutorial for setting up CERT manager.
Steps:
Create new kind cluster
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-14 at 12:19Posted community wiki answer for better visibility based on the OP edit in the main question. Feel free to expand it.
The solution for the issue is to upgrade to the current, supported version (from the OP edit in main question):
I actually updated to the latest cert-manager (v.1.6.1) and did the exact same steps. It seems to work. Maybe it was bug in that version. Weird!
Version 1.6.1 is currently supported (as of today - 14.12.2021) until Feb 9, 2022.
Version 1.0.4 is outdated, not supported since Feb 10, 2021.
QUESTION
I have the following Dockerfile:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-28 at 13:12With this instruction…
QUESTION
I am working on a microservice app and I use nginx ingress. I setup rules with 3 services, when I mention host in the rules like this bellow it always gives me 404 for all the services
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-21 at 11:48The problem is in dash -
in the following line:
QUESTION
I'm trying to add a self-signed certificate in my AKS cluster using Cert-Manager.
I created a ClusterIssuer
for the CA certificate (to sign the certificate) and a second ClusterIssuer
for the Certificate (self-signed) I want to use.
I am not sure if the certificate2
is being used correctly by Ingress as it looks like it is waiting for some event.
Am I following the correct way to do this?
This is the first ClusterIssuer
"clusterissuer.yml":
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-18 at 14:13First I noticed you're using v1alpha2
apiVersion which is depricated and will be removed in 1.6
cert-manager:
QUESTION
Trying to use library 'pem' to generate a certificate with v3_req extension but I'm always getting an error. API documentation says that If I specify config then the v3_req section will be used. But right now, it can't be load and display this error :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-19 at 21:23I finally found my mistake, I was wrongly using config parameters. The right way to do it ->
QUESTION
I'm using a private key to sign a JWT token, which works as expected. However, I'd like to leverage Azure Key Vault to do the signing for me, so that the private key doesn't leave KeyVault. I'm struggling to get this to work, but not sure why.
Here's the code that doesn't use KeyVault and does work...
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-10 at 00:48Your code is mostly correct, though you should use either Encoding.UTF8
or Encoding.ASCII
(since the base64url characters are all valid ASCII and you eliminate any BOM concerns) to get the bytes for headerAndPayload
.
I was able to get this to work and found that https://jwt.io is rather vague when it says you can paste either a public key or certificate. It has to be PEM-encoded, and if posting an RSA public key you have to use the less-common "BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY" label instead of the more-common "BEGIN PUBLIC KEY".
I tried a few things that all should've worked, and when I found that using a certificate from Key Vault did with "BEGIN CERTIFICATE", I went back to trying "BEGIN PUBLIC KEY". It wasn't until, on a whim, when I changed it to "BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY" the JWT was successfully verified.
Below is the code I tried using certificate URI:
QUESTION
I'm trying to deploy bazel-remote, but when I try to:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-27 at 15:07NGINX Ingress Controller is only working using HTTP or HTTPS:
An Ingress does not expose arbitrary ports or protocols. Exposing services other than HTTP and HTTPS to the internet typically uses a service of type Service.Type=NodePort or Service.Type=LoadBalancer.
So you can't use a custom port 8080
- it won't work.
Based on NGINX Ingress Controller docs:
By default the controller redirects HTTP clients to the HTTPS port 443 using a 308 Permanent Redirect response if TLS is enabled for that Ingress.
This can be disabled globally using ssl-redirect: "false" in the NGINX config map, or per-Ingress with the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/ssl-redirect: "false" annotation in the particular resource.
You have setup TLS, so Ingress Controller is redirecting you to HTTPS port.
Change your curl command to:
QUESTION
I have a Problem with my grpc connections and nginx.
So, i've got these things : a client, a server, nginx. They all run on the same machine.
The client does some network scanning and is supposed to send it's results to the server,
The server is supposed to take the scanning-results and put them into a database. The server is based on ASP.Net - See appsettings.json The client and server use "grpc-dotnet" with "protobuf". Both also use the SSL certificate and generally they both work as expected.
The nginx proxy is supposed to be used as a Reverse-Proxy -> Clients only need to know one Endpoint for all their Requests. Nginx is only configured to pass grpc requests, nothing else.
First of all, almost all grpc requests do work. But they stop working, if the request gets too big. I dont know the exact size, but it must be under 180kb.
(180kb is the size of the scan results.In a test, sending half of these results succeded, where sending all did not. Custom test data (with the same class of course) did show the same results. If they got too big, it stopped working)
Without nginx, there are no errors while sending data from client to server. With nginx however, the client does recieve a HTTP 504 error.
Content of error.log (nginx)
2021/07/27 13:27:28 [error] 21464#7952: *66 upstream timed out (10060: Ein Verbindungsversuch ist fehlgeschlagen, da die Gegenstelle nach einer bestimmten Zeitspanne nicht richtig reagiert hat, oder die hergestellte Verbindung war fehlerhaft, da der verbundene Host nicht reagiert hat) while sending request to upstream, client: 127.0.0.1, server: , request: "POST /UI.Remoting.Discovery.Contract.DiscoveryService/SaveDiscoveryResult HTTP/2.0", upstream: "grpcs://127.0.0.1:30053", host: "localhost:30051"
"Ein Verbindungsversuch ist fehlgeschlagen, da die Gegenstelle nach einer bestimmten Zeitspanne nicht richtig reagiert hat, oder die hergestellte Verbindung war fehlerhaft, da der verbundene Host nicht reagiert hat" translates to :
A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond
nginx.conf - i did try many configurations - they do not solve my problems. The configurations shown below are just to show you, which ones i've tested, but there might be missing some. I've tested them in multiple different arrangements and selectively tested out each configuration in different areas (server, http, location)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-12 at 10:50It seems like there actually is a bug in the current nginx versions. I've posted a new ticket in nginx's ticket system. https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/2229
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install selfsigned
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page