asyncgenerator | Asynchronous Generators for ES7 | Reactive Programming library
kandi X-RAY | asyncgenerator Summary
kandi X-RAY | asyncgenerator Summary
Asynchronous Generators for ES7
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Create a promise resolution .
- Internal helper function .
- decorate iterator function
- Handle promises .
- Resolves a promise .
- closure for resolver
- resolve value for new value
- PromisePromise constructor .
- Push task to the queue .
- Handler for an application .
asyncgenerator Key Features
asyncgenerator Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on asyncgenerator
QUESTION
I'm trying to build stub objects to test my hyperledger fabric chaincode written in typescript.
The method I'm interested in stubbing is the getHistoryForKey
method which has a return type of Promise & AsyncIterable
.
Can someone please tell me how to generate a stub object for this?
My code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-05 at 05:34This was a pretty tough one. Found it easier to just call the original code and mock out certain functions than try to recreate the getHistoryForKey
object manually. All this code is inspired from looking at the unit tests.
Here's the code:
QUESTION
Consider the following code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-24 at 16:45I just happened to come up with the same problem and found this question on the very same day, but also figured out the answer quickly.
You need to remove async
from the abstract method.
To explain why, I'll simplify the case to a simple async iterator:
QUESTION
I've been playing with using async generators in Typescript React apps.
I created the following component:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-15 at 12:54You can add isMounted
to check component is unmounted or not.
QUESTION
I am trying to set env variable in the cloudbuild.yaml file but it's not getting set. Am I missing something ? Below is the yaml file:
cloudbuild.yaml
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-26 at 13:07You need to remove the space before and after the =
QUESTION
Within an async generator function in Javascript, which is intended as a transform function, the first parameter is itself an async generator function. Within the function there is a conversion and a check. If the check is falsy, the generator function should be aborted. If the check is correct, the result should be yielded. I have simulated the error with the random.
I have found three ways to throw the error:
- return Promise.reject(new Error("Some Message"));
- throw new Error("Some Message.");
- yield Promise.reject(new Error("Some Message"));
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-09 at 10:50Yes, they are all identical. There are no leaks, all of them also close the source
iterator (calling .return()
on it).
You should use the simple throw new Error(…);
for explicitly throwing an error yourself, the other forms are useful when you are calling a promise-returning function and work as with an implicit await
.
QUESTION
I am unable to figure out what mistake i have done in the code
Whenever i am calling api, ipfs.add('hello') returns [object AsyncGenerator]
...https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/[object AsyncGenerator]
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-14 at 02:11You can iterate over the result of .add() like so:
QUESTION
all hi!
have a query
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-23 at 06:51found a solution. Maybe someone will help. it looks like this
QUESTION
I want to quickly declare a transform stream without any additional libraries. Making async generators into transform streams via stream.Transform.from
looks like a good choice.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-25 at 18:40The read
function is not actually from the Transform
class. Transform
is a child class of Duplex
which is a child of Readable
and Writable
. The only .from
function in the stream
module is the Readable.from
function, so you're actually calling that.
You can verify this yourself:
QUESTION
I have an async generator function (of a batch job), which got quite big over time. I want to split it into multiple functions :
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-19 at 00:16Just like in a normal generator, you can use yield*
inside an async generator to yield that a sub-generator yields, even if the sub-generator is async too:
QUESTION
I have a generator method that adds asyncronously some stuff to an array and at the end yields each member with yield* array
like so:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-14 at 09:40Your main Problem is AsyncGenerator
... As you did not specify the third generic parameter, it's default value (unknown
) is used, and unknown
missmatches undefined
.
The missmatch occurs because the inner iterator does not expect any values passed into the iterator via next(value)
, therefore it's TNext
generic parameter is undefined
. As you yield*
that iterator, calling next(...)
on your generators iterator will call the inner iterator with the same arguments, therefore the arguments have to match.
Typescript infers the type of a generator function to AsyncGenerator<..., ..., undefined>
for exactly that reason, and you should do that too (as long as you dont want to pass values into the iterator with .next
): AsyncGenerator
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install asyncgenerator
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page