ssa.js | Construction of minimal SSA form | Form library
kandi X-RAY | ssa.js Summary
kandi X-RAY | ssa.js Summary
Construction of minimal SSA form.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ssa.js
ssa.js Key Features
ssa.js Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ssa.js
QUESTION
In NodeJS, I am instantiating two objects from two different classes, putting them into an array, and then mapping through them with Array.map. If I do this all in one file, it works fine. However, if I create the objects in a different file and export/require the array, it comes in undefined.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-20 at 00:42The problem is the line
QUESTION
When I import ClassA inside ClassB, and then import ClassA inside ClassB, the imported ClassA is an empty Object. To demonstrate, I have these 3 files:
ClassA.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-23 at 06:29You have a circular dependency. The solution is to have a third class that will require both and use whatever code you have from ClassA
in ClassB
and the other way around.
QUESTION
Having a C# / C++ packaging structure in mind, how do I achieve to have JS-classes in individual files all imported as a single name space?
My currently working solution is to use an additional "package"-script file, which then encapsulates all classes. See the code below.
It seems as this includes a lot of overhead (updating the package-script-exports with every new class, importing this script in every new class).
ClassA.js:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-22 at 10:47My currently working solution is to use an additional "package"-script file, which then encapsulates all classes.
Yes, this is the best practice. The "package" script file is typically called index.js
placed in the directory of the package, as that's what the folder path is resolved to when importing.
importing this script in every new class
No, you should not do that. It introduces a circular dependency. As long as your module doesn't depend on any of the other classes, it should not import anything. There is no "package declaration", the module is a standalone file with its own dependencies.
Notice also that you shouldn't export your class twice from the module, the default export is enough. So you'd use
QUESTION
I have an existing ES6 class ClassA.js
like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-13 at 18:31Typings are not supposed to be used for linting the libraries themselves, you can't make the IDE (or tsc compiler) to use them for this purpose. I'd suggest using JSDoc annotations instead, like:
QUESTION
I am trying to receive the return value of a method in another class with react-native.
ClassA.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-08 at 19:41you need to add static keyword to use as a class method,
QUESTION
So, we have decided to start converting our react app to Typescript. The plan is to do this gradually. From what I read online this shouldn't be an issue but, I have come across a problem when trying to convert over my "leaf-level" classes. So, here's my problem. My classes look like this:
ModelClassA.ts
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Mar-12 at 16:32you're missing a .
in your extensions webpack config extensions: [".js", ".jsx", ".tsx", "ts"]
. ts
should be .ts
QUESTION
I try to call a function of classA inside my mainClass. And then I try to call functions of mainClass inside classA. I tried to use .bind() and .call() but it doesn't work. It only works if I use .bind(this) or .call(this) on functions, but not while I try to instantiate a new class.
index.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Mar-10 at 13:16In a comment you've clarified what you're trying to do (it's also a code comment in the question):
How can I call aFunction() from classA then?
You'd do that by giving the code in ClassA access to your instance. You might pass it to the constructor which could save it as an instance property, or you might pass it to doSomething
.
Here's an example passing it to the constructor:
QUESTION
I'm trying to load an external JavaScript, do some work with it, delete it and load it back again. But I'm having problems and maybe someone can help me understand why.
Here is an example of an external script to be loaded:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jan-30 at 00:33No, it is not possible to remove an ES6 (ECMA2015) class declaration from memory.
In regards the script element, the JavaScript engine parses and runs the script after it has been loaded. Running the script declares ClassA
in global scope. Deleting the script element doesn't remove the declaration - in the same way deleting the source file of a compiled program won't delete an object or executable file already created from it.
ES6 also introduced special arrangements for let
variables, constants and classes: they are block scoped and may not be re-declared in the same block or in global scope. Trying to do so is considered a programming error:
QUESTION
I'm trying to spy on all the params passed to a side-effect-ey function, which is composed with an anonymous function container receiving a final param
(actually i want to stub it, but spying would be a start)
classA.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-06 at 10:36A stub is actually required for this:
QUESTION
For example, I have a class:
classA.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Sep-19 at 19:17You could try something like :
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ssa.js
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page