recipes | A Vue.js Single Page Application | State Container library

You can do:

This is a tricky one - the plainest option might be to move push() and setRecipeLibrary() inside the then() callback so they're all within the same scope, but that would have some terrible side effects (for example, triggering a re-render for every recipe retrieved).

The goal (which you've done your best to achieve) should be to wait for all the recipes to be loaded first, and then use setRecipeLibrary() to set the full list to the state. Assuming that get() returns a Promise, one way to do this is with await in an async function:

My goal with this structure is to get the ingredients and the authors seperate from the recipes in order to update them independently.

That does not exclude the option to keep the data embedded in the recipes collection. You can keep a separate authors and ingredients collections AND also embed the fields needed in the recipe doc.

After some relevant author update you can issue recipes.updateMany({"author.id": authorId}, { $set: { author: author.profile}})

The idea is that author is not going to change very frequently, or at least the relevant data for recipes (basic profile info excluding birthdate, address, etc).

Also the authors collection can include a list of the last 10 recipes, for example with only title, and date,...

And one last question: how many concurrent connections would be possible with a Mongodb database?

No need to worry about that, it can handle as many as you need by adding hardware.

If I understood your question correctly....

Below is example of exception handling in better way

Microsoft Graph API - ERROR response - Example :

I have used pybind in the past (two or three years ago) and it worked without problems with conan. However, I tried to install it now and faced similar problems. This might be related to the evolution of conan towards conan 2.0 (an alpha version was released today) and that the recipe was not updated to account changes.

An alternative that you might consider, is to install pybind with conan using a different generator. More specifically, the CMakeDeps generator. With the CMakeDeps generator conan will create a pybind11-config.cmake file for you and you just need to use find_package(pybind11 REQUIRED) in CMakeLists.txt. That is, there is no "conan specific stuff" in your CMakeLists.txt file.

conanfile.txt

You can create your own TextInput and TypedModelListField field to handle this. I think what you're looking for is something which allows the user to both search and provide a recommended selection of choices but validate the input against a model (Ingredient).

I've created one here:

When looking closer at the source code of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils it seems like what's making this whole thing work is this setImmediate call happening after the first effect flush in recursivelyFlushAsyncActWork.

It seems like act chooses to use this recursivelyFlushAsyncActWork simply because the callback has the signature of being "thenable", i.e. a Promise. You can see this here.

This should mean that what happens is (simplified) this:

1. The useEffect callback is flushed (putting fetch on the event loop).
2. The setImmediate callback "ensures" our mock promise / fetch is resolved.
3. A third flush happens by a recursion inside the setImmediate callback (called by enqueueTask) making the state changes appear in the DOM.
4. When there's nothing left to flush it calls the outer most resolve and our act resolves.

In the code that looks kinda like this (except this is taken from an older version of react-dom from the node_modules of my React project, nowadays flushWorkAndMicroTasks seems to be called recursivelyFlushAsyncActWork):

When you set a cookie with SameSite=None it'll be blocked (by the browser) unless it also has Secure, which is omitted/set to false in the code snippets.

You need to create a secondary thread where you run your async code. You initialize the secondary thread with its own event loop, which runs forever. Execute each async function by calling run_coroutine_threadsafe(), and calling result() on the returned object. That's an instance of concurrent.futures.Future, and its result() method doesn't return until the coroutine's result is ready from the secondary thread.

Your main thread is then, in effect, calling each async function as if it were a sync function. The main thread doesn't proceed until each function call is finished. BTW it doesn't matter if your sync function is actually running in an event loop context or not.

The calls to result() will, of course, block the main thread's event loop. That can't be avoided if you want to get the effect of running an async function from sync code.

Needless to say, this is an ugly thing to do and it's suggestive of the wrong program structure. But you're trying to convert a legacy program, and it may help with that.