LDT | Lightweight in browser syntax highlighting | Code Inspection library

After visiting all pages about it where I found and tried many many ideas, none worked for me so I write this post. My API in java 8 spring boot 2.2.0 have beans that are generated from xsd files. I recently changes the Date type to LocalDateTime (because deprecation so it's time to change). The problem is, before, Date were display in a timestamp format (as a long) and now LocalDateTime are display in an array and I don't want it.

What I tried to solve:

• I had a WebMvc annotation on a confiuration class, removed it, not solved the issue.
• I added WRITE_DATES_AS_TIMESTAMPS: true in my application.yml (tried many formats on this properties)
• I have a configuration class for message converters where I tried to manually force timestamps.
• I wanted to add a Json annotation in my beans but as it generate from xsd, I don't know if it is possible. it is ?

Here is a snippet of the configuration class for message converters :

I am working on an update statement for an AS400 DB/2 table. It needs to have multiple rows updated using data from another table with matching fields. Our version of the driver displays is: 05.04.0000 OS/400 V5R4M0

I am having trouble figuring out the correct syntax to use.

Here is the basic CTE I am using to collect the correct data to use:

In a 64 bit program the selector:offset used to get the stack protector is fs:0x28, where fs=0. This poses no problem because in 64 bit we have the MSR fs_base (which is set to point to the TLS) and the GDT is completely ignored.

But with 32 bit program the stack protector is read from gs:0x14. Running over a 64 bit system we have gs=0x63, on a 32 bit system gs=0x33. Here there are no MSRs because they were introduced in x86_64, so the GDT plays an important role here.

Dissecting this values we get for both cases a RPL=3 (which was expected), the descriptor table selector indicates GDT (LDT is not used in linux) and the selector points to the entry with index 12 for 64 bits and index 6 for 32 bits.

Using a kernel module I was able to check that this entry in 64-bit linux is NULL! So I don't understand how the address of the TLS is resolved.

The relevant part of the kernel module is the following:

I have a data frame data_set and two infos important in a list

cond_list = [{'LQ','DA'},{'HJ','OP'}].

Report all information between the two values LQ and DA OR HJ and OP in new column 'Another Pass' and which condition in the same day and same id.

Example:

Let i, j correspond to the Rank of LQ and DA respective. i

• ID 1552, date 1/4/2020, we have Info['LQ'] correspond to Rank = 1 and Info['DA'] correspond to Rank = 4 --> So all information 'Another pass' include [LA, BA] because Rank DA < Rank LA, Rank BA < Rank LQ

• ID 1552, date 5/4/2020, we have Info['LQ'] correspond to Rank = 3 and Info['DA'] correspond to Rank = 7 --> So all information 'Another pass' include [VT,AN,VB] because Rank DA < Rank VT, Rank AN, Rank VB < Rank LQ

• ID 1697, date 15/4/2020, we have Info['LQ'] correspond to Rank = 1 and Info['DA'] correspond to Rank = 4 but there is no information in between these two points so 'Another pass' is empty

Input:

i filtered a table of values containing only two condition elements:

Hi I am having small Java code snippet. I am using Java 8. I have a Java LocalDateTime object and I want to format it. Please see my code below.

boot.asm:

I am trying to replace old java Date with new DateTime. I am running the below code to check various formats:

I have to convert a date for the purpose of comparison using junit. I get a date from DB which is "06/25/2021 10:26:33.0" and I have to convert it to "2021-06-25T10:26:33.000-04:00" before I use it in the asserts.

I am trying not to use SimpleDate in java and use the the inbuilt java.time instead. However, I don't think I really understand everything in it. Here is the code snippet I have been playing around with. I have tried many things with this and I always get an error when the parse happens.

I have been trying to test the speedup potential of using Cython as compared to the base Python code. For this purpose, I wrote two scripts 'linearAdvec_mat.py' and 'linearAdvec_mat.pyx' as follows:

linearAdvec_mat.py: