2017-release | Old version of Learn Anything | Theme library
kandi X-RAY | 2017-release Summary
kandi X-RAY | 2017-release Summary
This is an old version of Learn Anything website as once featured on front page of Reddit & as top product on PH. The code is archived and is no longer used. If you wish to make any changes, feel free to fork it. Live version of this site runs on learn-anything.xyz.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of 2017-release
2017-release Key Features
2017-release Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on 2017-release
QUESTION
I recently made a switch in our test environment from an Azure App Services Windows to Linux. Everything is working as it was previously except our socket connections. There seems to be a lot of outdated information regarding the Linux App Service, and the documentation is lackluster. However, according to these release notes, support is available for web sockets on Azure App Service Linux.
In some of Azure App Service for Linux documentation, it states that you must disable perMessageDeflate
in order to get Web Sockets to work with Linux App Service and NodeJS. I believe I have done that in my HapiJS server code below. I have verified with a console.log(io)
that the setting perMessageDeflate
seems to be set to false correctly.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-04 at 03:27Do your WebSockets work if the Authentication is turned off?
I only experience problems with WebSockets using Linux Apps when I enable the Authentication features.
I believe this is due to a poor implementation of the EasyAuth proxy, and that it is considered a difficult problem for MS to fix.
QUESTION
I'm using the Nuget package Nerdbank.GitVersioning to version my C# .Net DLL project and it is all working for local builds (tried within VS2017).
However when I try with the Gitlab runner to obtain the version number for use during my Nuget packaging steps none of the environment variables have been set regardless of what I have in my version.json file and/or using the nbgv cloud tool
My version.json file looks like this and is in the root of the repo;
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-25 at 13:20Nerdbank.GitVersioning doesn't have an implementation for GitLab CI that can set the cloud build number. It can recognize when running in GitLab CI, but has no code in the SetCloudBuildNumber
method. Care to share a PR if you know how to make this work?
QUESTION
Related to TFS 2017 release management artifact files from version control
I'm asking a new question because I believe I have an edge case the answers don't directly address and I don't want to derail that OP. Specifically, how do I allow an independent, offsite team building required supporting scripts in a separate TFS Team Project supply their scripts as an artifact in the Release definition of a separate TFS Team Project? The separate team projects are built by independent customers and we are not allowed to append content to their source control. Further, updates to the scripts must automatically spread to all Release definitions using them on the TFS.
We have about 40 team projects in TFS all running on different schedules. A separate operations team handles all build and release management tasks in TFS.
Because of the constant bouncing between team projects and because ops also wanted to use the version control and work item tracking features in TFS, we created a separate team project for them to store scripts, installers, and license files. These are referenced in other projects' RM tasks for automatic installation/execution. There is also a separate version control folder tree for tracking project specific scripts - like this:
- Common
- Applications
- App1
- App2 ...
- App43
This makes it significantly easier for them to manage their scripts and associate them with work items themselves without having to shuffle across all the other team projects. The dev teams do not have access to the ops project.
However, when linking a version control artifact in RM from their project, it will only bind to the root and appears to copy the entirety of the version control structure to the agent, even though most of this content is not relevant to the app being deployed.
Is there a way to add specific, not all, folders from their project in version control as artifacts to a release definition in a separate project? We have our QA release start the process to production and it pulls in the artifacts from the ops project and the project being released. All subsequent releases reuse the artifacts that succeeded in the QA build instead of going back to the server for new versions of the artifacts.
Build definitions don't let us pick workspace paths outside of the team project so I don't see a way to pull in their scripts in a build step, either.
Is there a way to do this? How are other organizations handling this issue?
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-18 at 03:02No.
The same answer I provided in the other answer applies here: Don't. Publish them as NuGet packages or as separate build artifacts; a release definition can have multiple artifacts linked to it.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install 2017-release
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page