imagine | imagine collection for grunt-imagine

Because you've made a list of byte arrays. Not a list of bytes.

In other words, your list contains 1 item: An empty byte array.

You can't easily turn a byte[] into a List. There are slightly less trivial ways to do it (just do the obvious thing: Write a for loop), but note that a List is about 10x more wasteful than a byte[]. Generally, you don't 'want' a List, unless you are really very sure you do. Just about every byte-stream related API takes a byte[], In/OutputStream, or ByteBuffer, and rarely if ever a List, for example.

EDIT: To be clear, if the component type is not a primitive, then lists are just as efficient as arrays are, in practice more efficient (because it is cleaner code, and that is the only feasible road to a non-trivially-sized project that performs well). It's just collections-of-primitives that are, and it's the worst, by far, when we're talking about byte[].

Not sure how you'd go about solving this with Numpy, as there is no way to alter the tie-breaking logic of argmax, but you can do it with collections.Counter easily:

The doc says

INSERT with an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE clause is a “deterministic” statement. This means that the command will not be allowed to affect any single existing row more than once; a cardinality violation error will be raised when this situation arises. Rows proposed for insertion should not duplicate each other in terms of attributes constrained by an arbiter index or constraint.

So if you have a conflict on data2 on more than two rows, it will throw an error

I was able to get it resolved, but the solution is...hacky.

So, apparently, Google Apps Script exports only what is in globalThis of a project: just the functions and variables. No classes, no constants, ...

Probably has a lot to do with how ES6 works, with its globalThis behavior. One can see that in action, by creating a dummy function, a dummy variable, and a dummy class in their local developer console:

OK, so the real problem here is that you are using Java terminology incorrectly.

There are no member classes of the Manager class. Yup. That's what I said!

A "member class" is a class that is declared inside another class. But there aren't any classes declared inside Manager.

However, there are fields ("member fields") declared inside Manager; i.e. classA, classB and so on. And these fields have classes; i.e. ClassA, ClassB and so on.

If you want to find the member fields of a class, use the Class.getDeclaredFields() method. This will give you an array of Field objects.

You can then get each field's class by calling Field.getType() on it. Then you can use reflection to lookup the classses printResult() method and invoke it on the value in the respective fields of a target object.

Notes:

1. The Class returned by getType() could denote a primitive type or array type rather than a class. This Class will represent the erased type of the field.

2. If you want the Type as it was declared in the source code, use Field.getGenericType() instead.

If I understand you correctly, you are saving the value of a property (string in this case) and not an object itself, so your object will be garbage collected.

Variation on your first idea: Define your flag column as a timestamp instead of a boolean, then you don't have to take 30 seconds to initialize it to 0. Just update that timestamp to NOW() as you update rows. Once you are done, any rows where the flag column is older than your first updated row should be deleted. I'm assuming this update/delete task will be done again periodically, but the timestamp should still work as long as the tasks do not overlap.

Variation on your second idea: Don't run a query DELETE FROM imagine WHERE id IN(...30k ids...) predicate. Instead, you may run a series of DELETE FROM imagine WHERE id IN (...100 ids...). Loop over your list of id's and delete in batches of 100 at a time. You'll need to run 300 DELETE statements this way, but it's easy to write the loop.

A concept is not a type, so it can’t appear as a container element type—neither in the type of an object (this is why you have to use std::vector to approximate std::vector) nor in the type for your concept ContainerOf. Moreover, you can’t use a concept as a template argument, so you can’t have a higher-order ContainerLike concept.

What you can do is make a Container concept that checks only for empty, add the constraint

One possible approach to solve the issue:

Setup an orthographic camera such that its frustum encloses the cube. You can then position the camera in front of each side of the cube, use lookAt( cube.position ) to orient it properly and then render the scene into a render target. You need one render target per side. You can then use it as a texture for the respective plane mesh.

There is an official live example that demonstrates how RTT (render-to-texture) is done with three.js. Try to use it as a code template for your own app.

https://threejs.org/examples/#webgl_rtt