sw-test | This is a very simple demo | Web Framework library

by mdn JavaScript Version: Current License: CC0-1.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | sw-test Summary

sw-test is a JavaScript library typically used in Server, Web Framework applications. sw-test has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. However sw-test has 1 bugs. You can download it from GitHub.

Service Worker test repository. This is a very simple demo to show basic service worker features in action.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

sw-test has a low active ecosystem.

It has 648 star(s) with 226 fork(s). There are 31 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 8 open issues and 14 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 138 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of sw-test is current.

Quality

sw-test has 1 bugs (0 blocker, 0 critical, 1 major, 0 minor) and 0 code smells.

Security

sw-test has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

sw-test code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

sw-test is licensed under the CC0-1.0 License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

sw-test releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sw-test

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

sw-test Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for sw-test.

sw-test Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for sw-test.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on sw-test

Azure Pipelines multi stage problems for basic steps

How can I tell Workbox to check for a new version (long after page is loaded)

For ServiceWorker cache.addAll(), how do the URLs work?

C# EventLog.Delete Access Denied

QUESTION

Azure Pipelines multi stage problems for basic steps

Asked 2019-Dec-02 at 15:36

I come from GitLab and its .gitlab-ci.yml and I am experimenting with Azure DevOps multi stage pipelines but I am quite confused about how it works and what's the best strategy even after reading several documentation articles at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/?view=azure-devops

Please allow me to ask several related questions for the basic scenario I'm trying, which is compile, run unit tests, pack a nuget Package for the whole solution (it could contain multiple projects/nuGet packages) and publish the package to a nuGet feed (if the branch is master, a release version, otherwise a pre-release version). This is the repository I'm grabbing the code from: https://github.com/sasw-diego/sasw-test-support It would generate only a nuGet package but I've got other multiproject solutions which should generate many nuGet packages

This is my azure-pipelines.yml so far:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Nov-09 at 13:19

your whole build definition should be a single "stage". Those Build - AutomatedTests - NuGet Package - Publish are not stages, those are logical parts of the build.
probably sometime in the future that will\might happen
that is because you are using stages when you are not supposed to. each stage runs on a different agent. you should have a single stage and all the tasks should run inside that stage.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58778743

QUESTION

How can I tell Workbox to check for a new version (long after page is loaded)

Asked 2019-Sep-13 at 09:53

I have a complex app that runs fine offline and syncs when it comes back online. The only thing that does not "sync" is the app itself.

I know how to get a message when a new version is "installed" but I do not know how to tell Workbox to check for an update. I want the equivalent of:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Sep-13 at 09:53

Workbox does not have a feature for checking updates once the page is loaded. How ever you may manually trigger the check for update as below.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57680332

QUESTION

For ServiceWorker cache.addAll(), how do the URLs work?

Asked 2017-Sep-18 at 10:31

I see a lot of example code like this: (Slightly shortened version of this Mozilla Doc)

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Sep-14 at 07:35

Yes, a wildcard doesn't exist and that's actually completely reasonable when you come to think of it: the web server doesn't expose the files found in a path (eg. /gallery/) so how could the browser cache files that it doesn't know the names for? A web server can of course be configured to expose the directory listings of a path but browsers themselves don't have any ability to "take everything from this path x". The directory/index listing is just a bunch of HTML, not any mapping of files or so.

Caching both / and /index.html is a bit confusing but from the Service Worker's standpoint they are different URLs. The web server is usually of course configured to serve same file (index.html) whichever URL you visit but if you ask the SW, they are separate and should have separate entries in the cache. This can be tested easily: deploy something that caches the / but not /index.html (even though the web server serves index.html from /) and try to visit /index.html in offline mode. No luck.

I don't think there's any reason at all to cache /index.html if you are completely sure your web app never makes any requests to it. If your web app only knows of / then leaving /index.html out should be completely fine. I've tested this myself and it works perfectly. If someone has more information on the matter, please correct me!

Something to note that could be useful: the SW may be configured to treat / and /index.html as the same. So caching / and serving it whenever either one is requested is possible. I guess some of the libraries has this sort of functionality built-in.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46208326

QUESTION

C# EventLog.Delete Access Denied

Asked 2017-Jul-03 at 09:53

I have read other questions on SO in regards to security and registry keys, nothing has helped me solve my particular use case scenario.

Here's my scenario:

What I'm Trying To Do

I want to, in code, delete a windows event log.

The Problem

When executing the function, I receive a System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception. The exception message is "Access is denied".

How I Am Doing It Currently

I am using an impersonator function that I wrote which wraps around the EventLog.Delete function, it drops me into a user context that has full access to the EventLog Registry Hive. Subsequently the logs I am interested in also have full access for this particular user.

My Question

Why do I receive a "Access Is Denied" if the user I am running under (through impersonation) has full access to the log in question? I've tested my Impersonation function and it works as expected for other code I've written. I don't get why I would get access denied for this.

In another scenario with my impersonation function it works just fine, for example if I tried to write to a file that the user context that is running the program does not have write access to, then I would not be able to write to the text file, however if I use my impersonation to drop into a user context that does have write access then it works just fine (I can write to the file). So I just don't understand why the same concept can't be applied to registry keys.

What am I missing here?

The Code

Exception Message
My Test

Where sw-test is a user I created for testing purposes, it has full access permissions to the registry we are trying to delete.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jul-03 at 09:53

Okay I eventually got around to figuring this out, there were two issues at play here that were causing the mentioned exception being thrown, they are as follows:

1. Visual Studio was NOT running in administrator mode.

Not running visual studio in administrator mode was one part of the problem, this seems to be associated with access tokens in the windows OS. According to a source I read, if I run a program without UAC on (which is my scenario, I have it off), then the program being run gets a copy of my access token. However if I have UAC enabled, the program gets a copy of my access token but it is a restricted access token. (see: What precisely does 'Run as administrator' do?) - To be honest this doesn't really make sense in my case, why do I have to run as admin if I have UAC off? Shouldn't visual studio have an unrestricted copy of my access token? I am in the administrator group with UAC off...

2. Not Specifying NewCredentials As a Logon32Type In Impersonation

I don't really understand it but as soon as I specified this for my impersonation everything started working perfectly, I read a blog about it, it talks about how it was introduced in the VISTA days and how it was mainly used to specify credentials to outbound network connections to servers, and was mainly used to remedy security-related issues server-side. Don't see how it correlates to interfacing with local event logs though. (see: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/winsdk/2015/08/25/logonuser-logon32_logon_new_credentials-what-is-this-flag-used-for/)

Code

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44271981

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install sw-test

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: