UglifyJS | JavaScript parser / mangler / compressor / beautifier | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | UglifyJS Summary
kandi X-RAY | UglifyJS Summary
UglifyJS is a JavaScript parser, minifier, compressor and beautifier toolkit.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of UglifyJS
UglifyJS Key Features
UglifyJS Examples and Code Snippets
eslint@8.6.0 | MIT | deps: 38 | versions: 294
An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
https://eslint.org
keywords: ast, lint, javascript, ecmascript, espree
bin: eslint
dist
.tarball: https://registry.npmjs.org/eslint/-/eslint-8.6.
require(["ace"], function(ace) {
//This function is called when scripts/ace.js is loaded.
//If ace.js calls define(), then this function is not fired until
//ace's d
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on UglifyJS
QUESTION
I was working on Angular 8 project when the time came to upgrade it to Angular 12. Since I come exclusively from React environments, didn't think it would be this much of a hassle until I started. It has been 2 days that I have been following Angular Upgrade guide, but keep getting the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-22 at 08:00As misha130 suggested in the comments, there was (a single) library not aligned with the latest Ivy changes which was causing the error. I was fortunate enough to not have a lot of dependencies in the project, so I went through each one and uninstalled it until the app started without errors.
QUESTION
I'm trying to use the following code:
@apply w-[calc(theme(width.1/3)_-_1rem)]
which according to the docs, should work. But every time I try and compile the code I get the following error:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 19:05It seems Tailwind cannot take a value from config file on the fly (within square brackets in a JIT mode). I see the option to register custom width class within configuration file like
QUESTION
So i'm new in JS and i have a task for mastering Ajax Requests.I should send an email input from form to the server and a lot more,but i can not figure out how to send this data to a server that is in another folder.I lost all my nerves with this task and i dont know what to do.
So,i have a folder personal-website-server and another folder src where is my project,both folders are in another folder,the parent.
It looks like this :
./
dist < webpack bundle folder
node_modules
personal-website-server
/ package.json in personal-website-server
src
and package.json in the parent folder
Image for more understanding:
So,i should do this:
Upon clicking on the "Subscribe" button, implement the functionality for sending a user email to the server. For that, make POST Ajax request using http://localhost:3000/subscribe endpoint. The call to the server should only be made when the form is valid (the validate function )
The connection is made through a proxy to the server,idk how this thing works and i get it hard to do this task because its not so described.
Codes:
I created fetch.js in src that checks if email is valid and sends it to the server,like i understood:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-17 at 13:50I fixed the problem,it was in the webpack.config.js.I didnt listened to the apis and now it is like this :
QUESTION
We are using create-react-app
and Typescript within all of our projects and a slightly large module of commonly used React components has emerged. Trying to factor these out into its own NPM package (for easier maintenance and better reuse), here called PackageA
, we have arrived at a situation where the overall size of a test app, here called TestApp
, is larger than it was before (when the same code existed inside the code base of the same app). TestApp
is a VERY rudimentary app which basically just showcases some (but not all) parts of the components in PackageA
, formerly with the components inside the project itself, and now with this part removed and instead imported from privately published PackageA
.
Sizes of initial JS chunks before factoring out PackageA
with components from TestApp
("main" is assumed to be code from the project itself and the other chunk is believed to hold dependencies):
- Gzipped: "main" chunk ~ 31 kB, chunk with external dependencies ~ 193 kB (from output after building the app)
- Unzipped: "main" chunk ~ 93 kB, chunk with external dependencies ~ 653 kB (from browser)
Sizes after factoring out PackageA
from TestApp
:
- Gzipped: main chunk ~ 22 kB, chunk with external dependencies ~ 215 kB (from output after building the app)
- Unzipped: main chunk ~ 57 kB, chunk with external dependencies ~ 745 kB (from browser)
As can be seen, the overall size increases with 13 kB gzipped and 56 kB unzipped. This corresponds to an increase of ~ 6% gzipped and ~ 8% unzipped. This is not insanely much but I would still expect them to be somewhat similar.
Further information- The contents of
PackageA
is published as es6 modules to allow for tree-shaking which seem to work properly since unused parts ofPackageA
are not emitted into the output chunks ofTestApp
. - Minification of
PackageA
is done by UglifyJS prior to publishing using both--compress
and--mangle
options. - Source maps are not included in the source files of
PackageA
but only available separately. - The only packages listed under
dependencies
inPackageA
'spackage.json
are NOT used anywhere else inTestApp
and were subsequently removed from theTestApp
'spackage.json
at the same time as they were added toPackageA
'spackage.json
. The same versions were used. All other dependencies ofPackageA
are listed underpeerDependencies
. - All sizes were verified after deleting the
node_modules
folder and running a fresh install of dependencies. - The contents of
PackageA
is exactly the same as the deleted folder fromTestApp
with the exception of an addedindex.ts
page which exports the contents of the other files. This file is < 3 kB unzipped in size.
What could be possible sources of this increase in size and where could we start looking? Perhaps this increase might lie in how the code is transpiled in the package and that create-react-app
is somehow able to do this more efficiently for code included in the project itself than for imported code. I know this is a tough question that might have many answers and that is hard to reply to.
This is the tsconfig.json
used in the factored out PackageA
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-14 at 16:35I understand that this questions might be highly dependant on the situation you're in but still thought I'd share my process.
Measuring sizesUsually when you build, your framework outputs the sizes of the built artifacts. In the case of create-react-app
, these sizes seem to be the size of the gzipped versions.
You may also check your browser dev tools and note the sizes of the downloaded bundles which are typically NOT the gzipped sizes but the actual sizes.
When factoring something out or doing some sort of comparison, take notice of the different sizes before the change and after the change. Given some sort of intuition as to how these sizes should change evaluate if this is the case or not.
Analyzing the bundleWith NextJS you may use @next/bundle-analyzer
, in most other cases you may use source-map-explorer
. The latter uses source maps to map bundled code to sources; if the source itself has source maps, then these sources are used, otherwise you will see references to node_modules
. With source-map-explorer
, it might be worth both looking into the visual representation as well as the json representation since, with a lot of sources, the visual representation might suppress the participation of a certain component or library which the json representation will not.
With source-map-explorer
you may make some valuable comparisons between different versions of an app.
After establishing with, for example, source-map-explorer
that some source code expands more in some context that in another, you may want to research the issue further. Using source maps (either in development mode or in production mode if you have them available there), you may want to track the imprint of a certain portion of source code in the output bundle. A lot of browsers support mapping bundled code to source code (given source maps) but not all allow you to do the opposite. Firefox, however, has this feature and it allows you to, given bundled code, view the source code and vice versa. This is very useful when you're trying to track what some source code actually results in in the output.
Well, the following is a list of what caused the increased size in my case:
I imported from an index in my package and the index imported all of the exports of the package. This should not be a problem with esm modules, but without the
sideEffects: false
flag inpackage.json
there were some ambiguities. Even though the unused sources from MY package were not added to the output bundle, some indirect dependencies could not be ruled out as not having side effects, so these were added to the bundle, even though the component that imported them were not even used. AddingsideEffects: false
to thepackage.json
of my package solved this and reduced the package size.When keeping the components in my main project that was bundled using
create-react-app
, some convenience methods added by Babel in all transpiled files were removed thanks to the presence of@babel/plugin-transform-runtime
plugin. This plugin removes these convenience methods, given that some Babel runtime was guaranteed to be present when running these files (from which they could be imported instead). When the same configuration was used for the factored out components, the size shrank even more.Finally, at the time of this writing, the
tsc
compiler seem to output more verbose code than Babel (see TypeScript: tsc transpiles jsx to more verbose code than babel). When transpiling the package I first usedtsc
and after started using Babel, the size shrank even more.
All in all, with the above changes, the output ended up being just 1.7 kB larger (unzipped) than before the refactoring which was a both understandable and acceptable result.
QUESTION
I am having MVC application and trying to add Bootsrap5 through Webpack and am getting following error. I have tried many of the workaround with stage-0, stage-2 and stage-3 but nothing worked for me.
I am suspecting the issue is because of three dots (Spread syntax) but the workaround not helped for me.
Issue:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-22 at 06:01The solution worked for me is Upgrading of Webpack and including plugin for plugin-proposal-object-rest-spread
.
When we are upgrading Webpack, some of the plugin also need to be upgraded.
Package.json
QUESTION
In running yarn run build
I am running into the following error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-16 at 19:21I think it is case sensitive, ie. change the D
to a d
, change moduleIDs
to moduleIds
.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-30 at 10:30- I would use
export default {
instead ofmodule.exports = {
- You need to use the latest refresh plugin (0.5.0), explanation is in this issue.
QUESTION
Please could someone shed some light into the issues I'm having with Webpack. I've not used Webpack for fonts before and have run into a bit of a headache I've not been able to solve. I'm pulling the fonts from a .css file using url().
What I'm getting after Webpack has done its thing is 3 .woff files with their names changed to a hash like name. I then have a fonts folder with the 3 fonts in named correctly. Looking at the main.css (the one Webpack produced) the url() is now looking at the font files with the hash names. When I open the hash named .woff files its an export command pointing to the fonts folder and to the correct font.... Is this how it meant to work?
When I load up the webpack in the console I have errors for each file: Failed to decode downloaded font: http://localhost/OPM/wpcontent/themes/theme/assets/build/b4f8bd69b3d37cc51e2b.woff OTS parsing error: invalid sfntVersion: 1702391919
This is wants in the .woff file
export default __webpack_public_path__ + "fonts/font-icons.woff";
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-24 at 20:44tl;dr;
QUESTION
I am attempting to add an additional functionality to the Divi WordPress theme. To do this, I am trying to build an extension to the theme and then a custom module within the extension. Elegant Themes, the developer of Divi, provides a tutorial for creating an extension and also for creating a module within the extension.
My development PC is running XAMPP over Ubuntu 20.04. I followed the tutorials and installed WordPress + Divi. I then installed Node.js by running sudo apt install node
and then installed npm by running sudo apt install npm
. Next, I ran sudo npm install -g yarn
to install Yarn.
The next step called for me to navigate to the plugins folder (/opt/lampp/htdocs/development/wp-content/plugins
) of my WordPress site and run npx create-divi-extension development-1
.
When I attempted to run this command, I received the following response:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-20 at 11:46The issue was a result of not using the correct version of Node and not having the divi-scripts
package installed. The fix was simple really.
Step 1: In my home directory, I ran sudo n stable
and this updated Node to the latest LTS version.
Step 2: While still in my home directory, I ran npm install divi-scripts
. There were still some errors about deprecated dependencies (see here) but it worked.
Step 3: Navigated to my project folder and ran npx create-divi-extension development-1
and it ran successfully, but still with errors about deprecated dependencies for divi-scripts
.
QUESTION
I have created a simple MERN stack application and tried to deploy the app on heroku however, the build fails with this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-06 at 13:01Change your heroku.yml (here) file to
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install UglifyJS
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page