ttl | Simple in-memory cache for JavaScript | Caching library

The Access Denied error indicates that AWS has rejected your call to DescribeInstances().

If an IAM Role has been assigned to the instance, then add the ec2:DescribeInstances permission to the IAM Role. The Amazon EC2 Instance Metadata Service will be used to retrieve credentials for IAM Role.

If you are using credentials from an IAM User, the add the permission to that IAM User.

Tags are not provided by the Instance Metadata service.

There is no workaround to reduce the payment. For example, the Basic SKU include at least 10 GB storage, you can't pay less than $0.167 each day for the storage, even if you only use 500MB. Just like you use a part of something, but you can't only buy the part, you need to buy the whole thing.

If I pull the image from other repo. Will be image bei Azure cached? If yes, then what is TTL for my image?

The cache images mean Azure already pulled the images and don't need to pull again. The time to pull your custom image depends on two things. One is if the base image or your custom image in the list of the cached images. Another one is that how many layers your custom image have except the cached image. So Azure suggest you switch to use the cached image as the image or the base image and try to create less layers.

Finally found the answer, apparently we need to enable certain configurations while starting zookeeper.

1. Go to conf directory
2. Create a new file called zoo.cfg
3. Paste the following to the file

The dictionary is actually quite simple. We have the key states, and it's value is a list containing sub dictionaries. If we iterate through this list we can easily index state_id and state_name. Now I don't know how you want to store this gathered data, so I assumed it would be best to put each group of "state_id" & "state_name" in a tuple.

What I ended up doing was to add a local-exec provisioner to the DNS record resource -- but one that modifies the public IP using an explicit CLI command. Not a good solution because it is not where you'd look, but at least the ordering is right. Also I think the way I do it only works if you did az login to give Terraform access to your Azure account, though I'm sure you can configure az to use the same credentials as Terraform in other cases.

Here is a worked example with an explicit azurerm_public_ip resource, illustrating another Catch 22: On next apply, Terraform will see the reverse_fqdn attribute and attempt to remove it, unless you tell it that it's OK. (In the OP, the public IP was created by an azurerm_kubernetes_cluster resource and Terraform does not store its full state).

You can update the ttl to desired value while updating the column. I mean you can achieve it programatically. Please go through this page ( https://docs.datastax.com/en/cql-oss/3.3/cql/cql_using/useExpireExample.html ) for examples.

Your dynamic block should be:

As workaround i add "finally" scope to remove lock-key from cache after first initiation, and this:

Setting up DNS as follows works ok so far for me: