graphql-types | Experimental Facebook 's GraphQL type definitions | GraphQL library
kandi X-RAY | graphql-types Summary
kandi X-RAY | graphql-types Summary
Experimental Facebook's GraphQL type definitions
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Removes empty arrays .
graphql-types Key Features
graphql-types Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on graphql-types
QUESTION
I am struggling to understand how to use Apollo Rover in conjunction with Apollo Codegen to generate my typescript types for my API's schema. I registered my schema in apollo studio, and can grab the schema into a GQL file, but it looks like codegen is not supported in the Rover CLI and so I need to use the legacy Apollo CLI. However the Apollo CLI wants schema to be fetched from a remote endpoint and not a registered schema, and wants the schema in JSON format, but Rover only fetches in .gql format.
I'm confused about how I am "supposed" to hook this up so that I can use apollo codegen with my registered schema without a bunch of manual conversion work.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-26 at 16:51I found this. I think you should keep use Apollo CLI.
Rover does not currently provide client-specific features, such as code generation or client checks. For these features, continue using the Apollo CLI.
Another solution use, it work for me ;)
QUESTION
(node:8356) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: No type definitions were found with the specified file name patterns: "./**/*.graphql". Please make sure there is at least one file that matches the given patterns.
at GraphQLTypesLoader. (E:\NestJS\Template_Login\teample-api-backend-nestjs\backend\node_modules\@nestjs\graphql\dist\graphql-types.loader.js:38:23)
at Generator.next ()
at fulfilled (E:\NestJS\Template_Login\teample-api-backend-nestjs\backend\node_modules\tslib\tslib.js:114:62)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)
(node:8356) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection. This error originated either by throwing inside of an async
function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch(). To terminate the node process on unhandled promise rejection, use the CLI flag `--unhandled-rejections=strict` (see https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#cli_unhandled_rejections_mode). (rejection id: 1)
(node:8356) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-15 at 19:30I ran into the same issue. This is most likely caused by the fact that the .graphql files are ignored in build time and not copied to /dist. Interestingly, I didn't have that before and the build seemed to complete just fine, it appeared only today.
I found a workaround to the problem proposed by the NestJS creator: https://github.com/nestjs/graphql/issues/135
QUESTION
Im currently trying to call a field on graphql-query from code, without using the http layer. In a test case I had success using this snippet inside of a field resolver. The breakpoint hits.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-30 at 19:56You can execute a GraphQL query without http by using the DocumentExecutor directly, and providing your own DocumentWriter if you want the data in a specific format. There is an extension method which returns JSON, but you can write your own.
This is an example test base class for testing queries: https://github.com/graphql-dotnet/graphql-dotnet/blob/master/src/GraphQL.Tests/BasicQueryTestBase.cs
This is a console example that returns JSON, not using http.
QUESTION
NOTE: See edit below for final solution based on @GarlefWegart's response.
I'm trying to write generic typings for dynamic GraphQL query results (more for fun, since I'm sure these probably exist somewhere already).
I'm very close, but have tapped out on a weird problem. The full code is here in a playground, and reproduced below.
The problem is centering around indexing an object using the keys of a derived object, which should work but for some reason is failing. Notice in the Result definition that I can't index T using K, even though K is defined as a key of U, and U is defined as a subset of the properties of T. This means that all of the keys of U are necessarily also keys of T, so it should be safe to index T with any key of U. However, Typescript refuses to do so.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 11:53It is true and obvious from the definition of Projection that keyof Projection is a subset of keyof T -- for a given T.
BUT: U extends(!) Projection so U itself very much can have keys not present in T. And the values stored under these keys can be basically anything.
So: Mapping over keyof U is not the correct thing to do. Instead, you could map over keyof T & keyof U.
You also should restrict U further to only have properties you want by adding U extends ... & Record. Otherwise you can pass in objects with bad properties. (I guess in your case it should be ... & SimpleObject?)
Here's a simplified example (without the complexity of your domain) illustrating some of the intricacies (Playground link):
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install graphql-types
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
