only-allow | Force a specific package manager to be used on a project | Data Visualization library
kandi X-RAY | only-allow Summary
kandi X-RAY | only-allow Summary
Force a specific package manager to be used on a project
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of only-allow
only-allow Key Features
only-allow Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on only-allow
QUESTION
We've recently started working on a project with create-react-app, but whenever someone adds a new package and commits those changes, we have to delete node_modules and install them again, even though we used yarn install.
What happens is, if I add one package, let's say "yarn add uuid" and commit both yarn.lock and package.json, when another dev pulls those changes and runs "yarn", it "installs" everything, and when he/she runs "yarn start" it will complain "Cannot find module 'uuid'". Even when they add again "yarn add uuid", when they run "yarn start" it'll complain again. The solution we saw was to delete node_modules and run "yarn install" again, but we have to do it every time.
I've never faced it before, I even thought it was something to do with my computer, but we're three devs facing the same problem.
We're using node v14.18.1, yarn 1.22.17 and react-scripts 4.0.3 we're all using yarn, I even added only-allow to only allow yarn
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-14 at 13:46I could solve this problem by updating react-scripts ^5, they've upgraded the webpack version and I think it did the trick.
QUESTION
Consider a pipeline with the following jobs:
build
: Runs the build and takes 1 minutereport
: Runs a static code analysis, posts the result to the MR and takes 59 minutes
Developers should be informed about the results of the report
stage as soon as possible, but it should not block the MR from being merged. The pipeline should behave like this:
build
must always be successful, before the MR can be merged.report
should always be started eventually and executed successfully, but it should not be mandatory to wait for it in order to be able to merge the MR.
Is there a possibility in gitlab to create such a pipeline?
So far, I am aware of the following options:
- Disable the "Pipelines must succeed" setting: In this case, the MR can be merged, even if
build
is not successful. - Set
allow_failure
forreport
to true. In this case, The MR can be merged afterbuild
has completed by cancelling thereport
job, but this violates the requirement that the report should always be executed. Also it is poor developer experience if you have to cancel an optional job before being able to merge. - Execute the
report
job after merge. This has two drawbacks:- I will get the report only when the MR is merged instead of as soon as possible.
- The
report
job cannot post it's result to the MR, which would notify the involved persons.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-17 at 13:55You can move your report
job into a child pipeline (= a separate .yml
file in your project) and trigger it with the trigger
keyword and without strategy: depend
.
This allows you to trigger the job without waiting for it and without considering its state in your pipeline.
QUESTION
Sorry I'm a newbie, but I'm trying to use the script I found here:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-22 at 19:54/*
You need the proper fopen wrapper server settings for reading
URLs using file_get_contents, see the notes at the PHP manual
*/
$allowedIps = explode('\n', file_get_contents('http://my/url/file.txt'));
$userIp = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
if (!in_array($userIp, $allowedIps)) {
exit('Unauthorized');
}
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement a kind of React children components validation to have only specific components but facing an issue with type.
Please check out my code below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-06 at 11:36As a possible solution to this is to pass the target children components to the parent component via component properties, instead of classic children
. Let's call the child components property Components
, to distinguish from the standard children
.
So here is how the child component array is validated (by the TypeScript itself) and rendered via the Main
component:
QUESTION
Please help me. Trying to use the variable as a value for subsequent processing does not work. I use it like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-04 at 06:48if I understand your script correct you want to get all eventlog entries but not those that match the pattern of "ignore.txt". to achive this you have to create ScriptBlock out of the string $a
:
QUESTION
Based on Only allow purchases on a time range for selected week days in WooCommerce answer, I am trying to modify the code to only apply this to two product IDs while all the rest should be available to purchase at any time:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-26 at 06:05To allow purchases on a time range for specific products only, use the following instead:
QUESTION
I have created this index using PUT http://localhost:9200/task_idx4 on postman:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-24 at 06:56disk usage exceeded flood-stage watermark
The problem here is that you don't have any space left on your harddisk.
You can check with the df
command, but apparently you're over 95% disk usage, so you need to make some room (ideally below 80%) before you can index data.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-09 at 14:59I am still not able to explain why setting the skipVisibility
parameter to true
/false
doesn't matter, however PathogenDavid over on the GitHub from the csharp runtime discussion repository showed me a solution which was way easier than expected.
QUESTION
Based on Only allow edit of custom field once per customer on My account > edit account in WooCommerce answer to my previous question, I am trying to apply a customer birthday discount.
Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-30 at 15:20$user_id
and $date
are not arguments from the woocommerce_cart_calculate_fees
action hook.
PHP functions used
- date - Format a local time/date
- d - Two-digit day of the month (with leading zeros) - 01 to 31
- m - Two digit representation of the month - 01 (for January) through 12 (for December)
So you get:
QUESTION
I'm trying to make the jump to pnpm from npm. I found a helpful hint to keep from running "npm install" after I make the change as described here: https://pnpm.js.org/en/only-allow-pnpm
Unfortunately my preinstall lifecycle override doesn't get executed. Seems to simple enough but npm install still works when I run something like "npm install @types/jest"
package.json:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-03 at 23:07Unfortunately, the preinstall
script is executed only during argumentless installation. So when you run npm add @types/jest
, that script will not be executed, thus npm won't be prevented from running.
But it will fail when running npm install
.
As of now, there is no other way to prevent npm from execution.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install only-allow
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page