rx-api | Reactive API system | REST library
kandi X-RAY | rx-api Summary
kandi X-RAY | rx-api Summary
Reactive API system for redux-observable
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of rx-api
rx-api Key Features
rx-api Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on rx-api
QUESTION
I have been using the lite-rx-api-hands-on tutorial to try to learn about reactor, and I am a bit puzzled by the results of one of the tests, trying virtual time with StepVerifier.
This works perfectly well:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-07 at 13:42It's because of the way the virtual time is implemented.
For explanation see Reactor Reference:
This virtual time feature plugs in a custom Scheduler in Reactor’s Schedulers factory. Since these timed operators usually use the default Schedulers.parallel() scheduler, replacing it with a VirtualTimeScheduler does the trick. However, an important prerequisite is that the operator be instantiated after the virtual time scheduler has been activated.
To increase the chances that this happens correctly, the StepVerifier does not take a simple Flux as input. withVirtualTime takes a Supplier, which guides you into lazily creating the instance of the tested flux after having done the scheduler set up.
Take extra care to ensure the
Supplier>
can be used in a lazy fashion. Otherwise, virtual time is not guaranteed. Especially avoid instantiating the Flux earlier in the test code and having the Supplier return that variable. Instead, always instantiate the Flux inside the lambda.
QUESTION
I recently upgraded my ASP .Net Core 2.2 Web API to .Net Core 3.0. Now, when I publish to Azure App Service from within Visual Studio 2019 Community (latest updates installed) I get this message:
There was a problem starting PropWorx.API on propworx-api-san. Your application requires the .NET Core 3.0.0 runtime, but Microsoft Azure App Service only supports the following versions: 2.1.12, 2.1.13, 2.2.6, 2.2.7 and 3.0.0.
Yet, the API appears to work just fine once deployed. Is this something I should be concerned about?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-14 at 06:26Don't worry much about it as its just a warning, You can keep track on the latest releases on the ASP.NET Core on App Service Dashboard
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install rx-api
Register the epic with redux-observable and create the reducer
Call that epic
We can create a wrapper for createApiEpic that injects authorization headers on every action created with it as such:.
Expanding on the above:.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page