redux-loop | A library that ports Elm 's effect system to Redux | State Container library
kandi X-RAY | redux-loop Summary
kandi X-RAY | redux-loop Summary
A port of the Elm Architecture to Redux that allows you to sequence your effects naturally and purely by returning them from your reducers. Isn't it incorrect to cause side-effects in a reducer?. Doesn't redux-loop put side-effects in the reducer?. It doesn't. The values returned from the reducer when scheduling an effect with redux-loop only describe the effect. Calling the reducer will not cause the effect to run. The value returned by the reducer is just an object that the store knows how to interpret when it is enhanced by redux-loop. You can safely call a reducer in your tests without worrying about waiting for effects to finish and what they will do to your environment. What are the environment requirements for redux-loop?. redux-loop requires polyfills for ES6 Promise and Symbol to be included if the browsers you target don't natively support them.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of redux-loop
redux-loop Key Features
redux-loop Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on redux-loop
QUESTION
I am working on a react redux application where in, on a button click I need to change my window location. As of now, I am dispatching the button click action and trying to achieve the navigation in reducer using redux-loop.
Component js
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-19 at 19:14the code you have looks correct. Did you use the store enhancer when creating your redux store? Did you try setting a breakpoint in your reducer and verifying it gets called as you expect? https://redux-loop.js.org/docs/tutorial/Tutorial.html
QUESTION
What is redux-loop and what is the main purpose of using it in a React Native Application?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-13 at 20:49Redux Loop is a library that lets you run side effects from your reducers in a pure and testable way by porting the elm architecture to redux. It serves a similar purpose as redux-thunk and redux-saga.
Here's an example where you can trigger a fetch and describe how to handle success and failure, all from your reducer.
QUESTION
I've changed my Android device from Android 7.0 to Android 8.0 to run a react-native app on. Previously adding the overlay permission in AndroidManifest allowed the app to run and display the developer menu on the device:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-08 at 22:38That line should look like this:
QUESTION
I have made a simple react app with the sample code from the following blogpost, which I leave only as a citation. I am otherwise new to the javascript ecosystem and am trying to fit together several unfamiliar tools (in order to learn them).
Relevantly, my store.js
looks like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-24 at 20:09There's an open issue that would address this, but until that is done it requires a hack. I called combineReducers with something like this (I am using immutable js. but if you're not it's simple to convert to that)
QUESTION
I run redux-loop official example with a little change:
- Instead of
fetch
I use promise with a timeout. - I added log middleware (copy-paste from redux.js.org tutorial).
side-effect function:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-27 at 13:14Why the reducer received a function instead of the actual user object?
QUESTION
I'm trying to navigate to the previous screen after a redux action. I'm using react-router
with react-router-redux
and redux-loop
.
Here's the scenario:
- On the home screen that there's a list of users
/home
. - Tap on a user to go to their profile
/home/profile/1234
. - Edit users name and tap save
this.props.dispatch(UserState.updateUser(id, user, history)
. - Once the user is updated successfully, go back to the home screen
/home
.
Here's some code:
View:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-20 at 23:15I think @bradford-medeiros is correct about the problem being with
Effects.constant(action.payload.history.goBack())
That's a side effect, so it should not happen in a reducer. You should not need to pass around the history object.
Not sure what version of react-router-redux
you have, but there are typically actions exposed by it that can cause the changes you want.
QUESTION
so i've come across a strange issue where the Provider component wont work when i try and host my website. If i want to run it locally using yarn start it works fine with the Provider. I'm pretty sure my hosting setup is correct as if i replace the Provider with a jsx component it displays that jsx page. Heres what i have at the moment in my App.js file.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Mar-26 at 15:44Managed to fix this, All the stuff above is correct, turns out it was a ReactRouter issue, i was wrapping my components in BrowserHistory, changed it to HashRouter and voila it worked. this thread helped me a lot React-router urls don't work when refreshing or writting manually
QUESTION
Sorry for the kind of vague title. The best way to explain my question might be an example.
I have a of items in redux, and the list is displayed in a react component using standard react-redux connected components. Each individual item has a button, which when clicked, does some asynchronous work, and then removes the item from the list and puts it in another list displayed somewhere else. It's important that the logic for starting the asynchronous work be handled in redux because it's important to the state of my application.
That basic functionality works, but now I want to add feedback to the button so that when the side effect succeeds, it changes the label to a Checkmark (for simplicity, i'll do nothing and leave the list unchanged if the request fails in this example). The item will stick around for an extra second with the checkmark before being removed from the list.
The problem is that if i remove the item from the list as soon as the async work is done, it is immediately unmounted, so I need to delay that. I've been trying to come up with a way to implement this logic that is reusable across my app, as I'll want the checkmark feedback in other unrelated parts of the app.
The simple solution is to dispatch an action on success that just changes the state to indicate that the item's request succeeded, and then do a setTimeout to dispatch another action 1 second later to actually remove the item from the list.
I feel like doing that logic will become very repetitive if i do it in different places across my app where I have a button. I'd like to be able to not have to repeat the timeout logic for every new button that needs this. But I want what my app displays to represent the current state of my app.
Has anyone dealt with an issue like this before?
Thanks
Edit: I don't think it should really change the general solution, but I'm using redux-loop to handle side effects. I feel like a generic solution will work fine with thunk or saga or whatever else though.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-17 at 21:38You mentioned that you are using redux-loop
to handle your async stuff. I'm more familiar with redux-thunk
, so if it's ok with you, I'll give you an answer that uses a thunk.
You can keep your code DRY if you put the timeout in your action creator, and then call that action creator from multiple buttons:
QUESTION
Code I'm working with:
// redux-reducer.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Feb-09 at 04:21Not yet in the docs, this worked for me:
From Jest blog about v15 changes:
Automocking is now disabled by default in Jest. This is by far the most confusing feature for new users and in many ways it doesn't make sense for small projects. We introduced automocking at Facebook and it worked great for us when unit testing was adopted in a large existing code base with few existing tests, but over time it felt like people spent more time fighting with mocked/unmocked modules than it would have taken them to write a test normally. We also noticed that library authors often require a huge number of basic modules that always have to be manually unmocked. Even for Jest itself we realized that the majority of tests had automocking disabled manually. We still believe that explicit automocking can be incredibly valuable. This change simply trades implicit mocks for explicit mocks via calls to jest.mock(moduleName).
If you would still like to use automocking by default, enable the automock setting in your configuration or manually call jest.enableAutomock() in your test or setup file.
Automocking now works with my package.json jest config as below:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install redux-loop
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page