array-chunk | Chunk array into small arrays specific length | Base64 library
kandi X-RAY | array-chunk Summary
kandi X-RAY | array-chunk Summary
Chunk array into small arrays specific length
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of array-chunk
array-chunk Key Features
array-chunk Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on array-chunk
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-24 at 13:59Chunks are basically the same thing as blocks for arrays. But chunk in this context is more like an action: to cut the whole dataset into chunks/blocks.
This action is also called partitioning in some contexts, particularly for dataframes and bags (which also have chunks, but they are not normally called blocks).
QUESTION
I am trying to learn how array chunking works by reading the docs here.
Below is an output from a Python session where I try to reproduce the examples.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-04 at 12:14Answered here.
Your chunks/blocks are in two dimensions, so you can index them in two dimensions
QUESTION
What I try to achieve: randomize the order of all elements in an array, but allow each element to change its position only by a limited number of "steps".
Say I have an array like below, and I wish to randomize with a limit of 2 steps:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-31 at 13:26I created this function to do this, but I guess it needs more improvements:
QUESTION
I just stumbled across a strange thing while coding in Java:
I read a file into a bytearray (byte[] file_bytes
) and what I want is a hexdump output (like the utilities hexdump
or xxd
in Linux). Basically this works (see the for-loop-code that is not commented out), but for larger Files (>100 KiB) it takes a bit, to go through the bytearray-chunks, do proper formatting, and so on.
But if I swap the for-loop-code with the code that is commented out (using a class with the same for-loop-code for calculation!), it works very fast.
What is the reason for this behavior?
Codesnippet:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-24 at 01:18There's an important difference between the two options. In the slow version, you are concatenating each iteration onto the entire hex string you built up for each byte. String concatenation is a slow operation since it requires copying the entire string. As you string gets larger this copying takes longer and you copy the whole thing every byte.
In the faster version you are building each chunk up individually and only concatenating whole chunks with the output string rather than each individual bytes. This mean much fewer expensive concatenations. You are still using concatenation while building uyp the chunk, but because a chunk is much smaller than the whole output those concatenations are faster.
You could do much better though by using a string builder instead of string concatenation. StringBuilder is a class designed for efficiently building up strings incrementally. It avoids the full copy on every append that concatenation does. I expect that if you remake this to use StringBuilder both versions would perform about the same, and be faster than either version you already have.
QUESTION
How would one convert the following array:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-03 at 07:01You can do it a little easier
QUESTION
Array input:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-12 at 21:58You could iterate your values and fill array using modulo :
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install array-chunk
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page