struct-type | Restricted structs for JavaScript | Transpiler library
kandi X-RAY | struct-type Summary
kandi X-RAY | struct-type Summary
[Chat on Gitter] status(version(status(Stable(A restricted Struct type for JavaScript.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of struct-type
struct-type Key Features
struct-type Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on struct-type
QUESTION
I have the following struct in one module:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-17 at 11:36How can I tell Go the correct struct-type in this case?
You cannot. This is not how encoding/json.Unmarshal works. You either have to unmarshal into a proper type or something else or use json.Raw message and do a second unmarshaling or whatnot but they way you approached it simply doesn't work.
QUESTION
Is there a way to define alongside a (typed) structure a contract for the entire structure in Typed Racket? In my particular case, I have a structure that takes two lists as fields, and I want to require the lists to be the same length.
I've looked at:
make-struct-type
, which allows specification of a "guard" that moderates constructor calls. I could pass a procedure that raises an exception if the lengths don't match, but I don't know what to do with the values returned bymake-struct-type
.struct/c
and thestruct
form ofcontract-out
, both of which produce structure contracts from contracts on individual fields. This seems unhelpful here.
Ideally I would like to bind the contract to the structure immediately (as in define/contract
), but I'm open to adding the contract when I provide
the type's procedures. However, I currently provide the recognizer and accessor procedures individually rather than using struct-out
(so that I can exclude or rename individual procedures), and I'd like to keep that flexibility.
Right now I have something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Mar-23 at 19:03Wow. I'm surprised how difficult it was to do that in Typed Racket. In plain (untyped) Racket its as simple as adding a #:guard
when making you struct
. Unfortunately, the struct
form in Typed Racket doesn't support it.
So, to deal with this, I would generate a structure type with a private (to the module) constructor name, and then make your own constructor function that actually does the contract you wanted it to check.
This will end up looking something like:
QUESTION
I am trying to copy a struct of type Big to type Small without explicitly creating a new struct of type Small with the same fields.
I have tried searching for other similar problems such as this and this yet all the conversions between different struct types happen only if the structs have the same fields.
Here is an example of what I tried to do:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-19 at 08:32Is there a way of converting between
Big
toSmall
(and maybe even vice-versa) without using aConvert
function?
The only option is to do it manually, as you have done. Whether you wrap that in a function or not, is a matter of taste/circumstance.
QUESTION
According the docs:
You can't declare a ref struct as a member of a class or a normal struct.
But I managed to compile and run this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-21 at 06:48It is not field of your class but rather return value of a property getter - which is fine as it is just function return value.
Note that "as a member of a class" usually includes properties and probably should be changed to "field of a class".
If you would try to declare it as a class field (either directly or indirectly via auto-implemented property) this will require part of the class (the data for ref struct
) to be allocated on the stack and the rest allocated in manged heap.
The code in the question defines non-autoimplemented property. As result there is no need for compiler to automatically create hidden field of the property type in the class. So while property result type is ref struct
it actually is not stored in the class and hence does not violate requirement for this ref struct
type not be included into any class. Note that even making setter method would be fine by itself - storing value for that property would be tricky, but you can safely store content of the ref struct
(public int value;
as in the post) in set
and recreate it in get
.
QUESTION
I want to write a function that takes different struct-types as 1 parameter. Also, i have to get sure, that in these struct ist a Id
field. so i want to have a function like this: MyFunction(object *struct{ Id int }
I have tried it with passing the struct to a *struct{ Id int }
and to a interface{}
parameter.
For example, i have these 2 struct-types:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-26 at 10:00I want to write a function that takes different struct-types as 1 parameter. Also, i have to get sure, that in these struct ist a Id field.
As of the current version of Go, you cannot do this. The only way Go supports passing multiple argument types to a single parameter is through the use of interfaces, and interfaces can only specify method sets, not fields.
(Go 2 plans to add generics, and this may be possible then. However, there's no concrete timeline for when that will be available.)
QUESTION
I'm having a problem with my Go project where one route handles CSS fine and another route's CSS is broken. The CSS used to work on both pages, but now it isn't loading for /login.html.
I know that I'm properly stripping the prefix for the /static/ folder because it's working in once place and not another. I also directly copied and pasted the header code from the working page to the not-working page (being careful to use the correct css file).
Negroni is showing that the application is making the call to the correct location:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-11 at 13:47As the comments suggest another handler is intercepting your static file route. Try simplifying your routes. Reduce:
QUESTION
I have an issue where I've got a function that takes in an Iterator
of a specific struct type, and I want to send in my Vector that contains this same struct-type as a parameter to the function.
I do not understand what I am doing wrong. I have tried several different things:
- Sending the
vecName.iter()
leaving me with thiserror: error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving <'_, code_test_lib::gfx::AsteroidDrawData> as std::iter::Iterator>::Item == code_test_lib::gfx::AsteroidDrawData
- Sending the
vecName.into_iter()
leaving me with thiserror: error[E0507]: cannot move out of borrowed content
- Sending the
&vecName.iter()
giving me thiserror: error[E0277]: &std::slice::Iter<'_, code_test_lib::gfx::AsteroidDrawData> is not an iterator
- Sending the
&vecName.into_iter()
giving me this:error[E0277]: &std::vec::IntoIter is not an iterator
I don't know how I can send the Vec
to the function as an Iterator
.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-01 at 14:39Your problem is that iter()
generate an Iterator
on reference not on the value. So you need to have a reference and a lifetime to your function. It's better to make a bound on IntoIterator
that allow more generality.
QUESTION
Seems that spanner support struct type. https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/data-types#struct-type
However, DDL didn't mention how to use. https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/data-definition-language#data_types
It's really confuse me, or I got misunderstood with the documents?
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-22 at 04:21You are correct. Sorry for the confusion.
Cloud Spanner doesn't support Struct as a column type. It only supports Arrays as column types, but it does return data from queries in Structs so it's a data return type.
QUESTION
my question is, how to bind(auto binding?) custom structure type in a map object(variable)?
this is my custom struct type
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-21 at 06:11Maybe you should remove struct tag 'form', when you use 'application/json' send data, 'form' tag is unused.
The program is going well when I just add 'json' tag, and if I add 'form' tag, echo uses the 'form' and get an error.
Hope this can help you.
QUESTION
Suppose you have a struct, like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-04 at 20:42The field names are not available at run time. However you can at expansion time use syntax-local-value
on the struct name to get some information.
A quick example:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install struct-type
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page