lgtm | A Chrome extension to print review statuses as stamp labels | Code Analyzer library
kandi X-RAY | lgtm Summary
kandi X-RAY | lgtm Summary
A Chrome extension to print review statuses as stamp labels on the GitHub pull request overview page. The extention adds stamps automatically using information already available on the page. It does not replace any functionality provided by GitHub, but makes review statuses more visible.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lgtm
lgtm Key Features
lgtm Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lgtm
QUESTION
template
class Predicate {
public:
bool operator()(const T& x) const;
};
template
class LessThan : public Predicate {
public:
explicit LessThan(const T& v) : val(v) {}
bool operator()(const T& x) const { return x < val; }
private:
const T val;
};
template
class Producer {
public:
T operator()(const C& c) const;
};
template
class HowMuch : public Producer {
public:
explicit HowMuch(Predicate p) : predicate{p} {}
int operator()(const C& c) const {
int count = 0;
for (const auto& x : c)
if (predicate(x)) ++count;
return count;
}
private:
Predicate predicate;
};
int main() {
const LessThan lf(5);
const HowMuch, int> hm(lf);
list li {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
cout << "How much numbers less than 5 is in {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, "
"10}? Answer: "
<< hm(li)
<< endl;
}
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-28 at 05:53You need to provide definitions for all functions of your classes. That means even if you only derive classes from Predicate and Producer you still have to implement the operator() in those classes.
If you don't want to do that (i.e. only have the function declaration but no definition), consider making these two classes abstract by declaring the operator() methods pure virtual. Then you cannot instantiate an object directly from these classes but only from derived classes that implement the operator() method. And that also means you can only pass Predicate* in your HowMuch constructor.
QUESTION
I'm currently trying to install Jenkins X into my GKE Kubernetes Cluster. But jx boot is failing on step "install-jenkins-x".
My jx version output is:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-14 at 21:54This is a known issue in jx boot on Windows - https://github.com/jenkins-x/jx/issues/7156. Have you tried it using Windows Subsystem for Linux?
QUESTION
After reading about support for algebraic datatypes in QL, I'm trying to define a List type in the lgtm console:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-17 at 17:40Since Cons extends TCons, you can treat this as an instance of TCons anywhere within a member predicate of Cons. This means that you can compare this to a particular instance of TCons, and bind variables to the constructor parameters.
QUESTION
Writing python code and using LGTM for automated code analysis. How can LGTM be advised to ignore (or exclude form its analysis) entire files?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-06 at 21:29You can put a configuration file lgtm.yml at the root of your repository and specify the files to exclude there:
QUESTION
I want to do TaintTracking with functions that taint their arguments with userinput. Example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-01 at 09:08The missing bit is in isSource, where the taint tracking starts from the 0'th argument to fgets. Using asExpr will describe the flow from that argument into fgets. What we want is the flow out of fgets through that argument. You'll get that by replacing asExpr with asDefiningArgument.
Here is a link to the results for your query where I've used both asExpr and asDefiningArgument in isSource. This means that if you extend isUserInput in the future, its expressions will be considered sources both as their value and as output arguments.
The new version of the query has 8 results, and some of them are hard to understand when you only see the source and the sink because they can be in different files. I've made a cleaned-up version of the query that
- generates path explanations between sources and sinks (
@kind path-problem), - removes the
IsTaintedArgclass wrapping of the helper predicates, - removes a few unused parameters and checks, and
- adds the call to
asDefiningArgument.
Here is the full query:
QUESTION
I received PR and went to test, research etc.
It looks good but I would like to add details in WRITE box (where usually we just put LGTM) in terms of:
1) "I tested function X and Y like this..."
2) "Here is a link to online documentation for Y describing why it is a good idea..."
3) "LGTM"
So my keyword LGTM should trigger approval but would additional comments mess up finding LGTM (so in that case additional comments are not allowed)?
Also, is it a good practice to add more details (e.g. as above)?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-02 at 14:13So my keyword LGTM should trigger approval but would additional comments mess up finding LGTM (so in that case additional comments are not allowed)?
No, as per the official readme:
Project maintainers can indicate their approval by commenting on the pull request and including LGTM (looks good to me) in their approval text.
Emphasis mine - note that LGTM just needs to be included, it doesn't have to be the sole comment.
Also, is it a good practice to add more details (e.g. as above)?
If more details would be helpful, then sure. But no reason to add them in just for the sake of it.
QUESTION
It seems that the web interface of Gerrit and the REST API show different results for the review votes.
For example, Change I78c787fd5dd09fc7700f3093341532fe23f20eb8 from the Android Gerrit review instance shows that Dima Zavin voted +2 (LGTM, approved).
The default values for the Android instance are
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-06 at 15:30It turned out to be a bug in the Gerrit backend.
QUESTION
There is a new feature needed and I did following: Forked whole repo to my personal repo. Now I know how to do a change in a code but should I:
- Create a new branch and submit a code to a new branch and then do PR or
- Do changes on a Master (in my personal forked repo) and then submit a PR?
Asking because in both scenarios there is going to be someone doing LGTM but not sure should I create a new branch or work on my forked master?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-01 at 22:34There is absolutely no difference. From the point of view of original repo, your master is just a regular non-master branch.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lgtm
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
