node-spdy | SPDY server on Node.js | Runtime Evironment library

 by   spdy-http2 JavaScript Version: v4.0.2 License: No License

kandi X-RAY | node-spdy Summary

kandi X-RAY | node-spdy Summary

node-spdy is a JavaScript library typically used in Server, Runtime Evironment, Nodejs, Express.js applications. node-spdy has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub, Maven.

SPDY server on Node.js
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              node-spdy has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 2789 star(s) with 224 fork(s). There are 75 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 67 open issues and 227 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 273 days. There are 8 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of node-spdy is v4.0.2

            kandi-Quality Quality

              node-spdy has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              node-spdy has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              node-spdy code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              node-spdy does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              node-spdy releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in Maven.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of node-spdy
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            node-spdy Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for node-spdy.

            node-spdy Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for node-spdy.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Server Sent Events and Ajax VS Websockets and Ajax
            Asked 2019-Nov-07 at 06:38

            I am creating an application(Nuxtjs) and am having troubles determining a good approach for sending data to the API(expressjs) and retrieving real-time updates. It seems that i can create "bi-di" connections with both protocals [Server Sent Events(SSE) and Axios or Websocket(WS)].

            Both technologies work with most of the browsers, so i do not see a need to add additional libraries such as socket.io - For those individuals that do not have a current browser (too bad).

            The application is based on user input of form data/clicks. Other users are then notified/updated with the information. At which point, the user can respond and the chain goes on(Basic chat like flow some information will be exchanged quickly while some may not or ever).

            In my experience, the user flow would rely more heavily on listening for changes than actually changing the data - hence why i'm considering SSE. Unfortunately, both protocols have their flaws.

            Websockets:

            1. Not all components will require a WS to get/post information as such it doesn't make sense to upgrade a basic http connection at the additional server expense. Therefore another method other than WS will be required(Axios/SSR). Example: Checking to see if a user name exists
            2. Security firewalls may prevent WS for operating properly
            3. express-ws makes sockets easy on the API end
            4. I believe you can have more than 6 concurrent connections by one user (which may be pro and con)

            Server Sent Events

            1. Seems like the technology is fading in favor of WS
            2. Listening to the events seem to be as easy as listening to events for WS
            3. No need to upgrade the connection but will have to use node-spdy within the expressjs API - This may also be a good implementation for WS due to multiplexing
            4. Little more backend code to setup http2 and emit the SSEs(Ugly code as well - so functions will be made)
            5. Limited to HTTP limitations (6 concurrent connections) which is a problem as the users could easily max this out(ie. having multiple chat windows open)

            TLDR

            The application will be more "feed" orientated with occasional posting(which can be handled by Axios). However, users will be listening to multiple "feeds" and the HTTP limitations will be a problem. I do not know what the solution would be because SSE seem like the better option as i do not need to continually handshake. If this handshake is truly inconsequential(which from everything i have read isn't the case) than WS is likely a better alternative. Unfortunately, there is soooo much conflicting information regarding the two.

            Thoughts?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Nov-07 at 01:10

            I personally avoid using websockets as a 2-way communication between client and server.

            I try to use sockets to broadcast data from server to users or a single user(socket), so they can get real-time updates, but for the post requests from client to server I tend to use axios or something similar, because I don't want to pass sensitive data (like access keys etc) from client to server.

            My data flow goes something like

            1. User posts data to the server using axios, SSE or whatever
            2. Backend server does what it has to and notifies socket that an event has occured
            3. Socket server then notifies who he has to

            My problem with using sockets to send data from client to server is the authentication issue. Technically, you can't pass anything that is not available to client-side javascript through a socket, meaning that to authenticate the action you will have to send sensitive information through a websocket. This is an issue for multiple reasons - if your sensitive data can be accessed using client-side js, there is a bunch of attacks that can be done here. Also someone can listen to the communication between ws and client. This is why I use API calls (axios etc) and store sensitive data to http-only cookies.

            So once server wants to notify the user that something has happened, you can easily do that by telling the websocket server to send the data to the user.

            You also want to keep your API server stateless, meaning no sockets in your API. I use separate server just for websocket connections, and my API server and websocket server communicate using redis. Pub/sub is a really neat feature for internal server communication and state management.

            And to answer your question regarding multiple connections - you can use a single connection between your websocket server and client, and broadcast data using channels. So one channel would be for notification feed, other channel could be for story feed etc.

            I hope this makes sense to you. This stack has worked really good for me.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58740029

            QUESTION

            Multiple SSL Certificates and HTTP/2 with Express.js
            Asked 2019-Oct-31 at 07:16

            Scenario:

            I have an express.js server which serves variations of the same static landing page based on where req.headers.host says the user is coming from - think sort of like A/B testing.

            GET tulip.flower.com serves pages/flower.com/tulip.html

            GET rose.flower.com serves pages/flower.com/rose.html

            At the same time, this one IP is also responsible for:

            GET potato.vegetable.com serving pages/vegetable.com/potato.html

            It's important that these pages are served FAST, so they are precompiled and optimized in all sorts of ways.

            The server now needs to:

            1. Provide separate certificates for *.vegetables.com, *.fruits.com, *.rocks.net
            2. Optionally provide no certificate for *.flowers.com
            3. Offer HTTP2

            The problem is that HTTP2 mandates a certificate, and there's now multiple certificates in play.

            It appears that it's possible to use multiple certificates on one Node.js (and presumably by extension Express.js) server, but is it possible to combine it with a module like spdy, and if so, how?

            Instead of hacking node, would it be smarter to pawn the task of sorting out http2 and SSL to nginx? Should the caching network like Imperva or Akamai handle this?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Mar-01 at 14:34

            Nginx can handle SSL termination nicely, and this will offload ssl processing power from your application servers.

            If you have a secure private network between your nginx and application servers I recommend offloading ssl via nginx reverse proxy. In this practice nginx will listen on ssl, (certificates will be managed on nginx servers) then it will reverse proxy requests to application server on non ssl (so application servers dont require to have certificates on them, no ssl config and no ssl process burden).

            If you don't have a secure private network between your nginx and application servers you can still use nginx as reverse proxy via configuring upstreams as ssl, but you will lose offloading benefits.

            CDNs can do this too. They are basically reverse proxy + caching so I dont see a problem there.

            Good read.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42522805

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install node-spdy

            You can download it from GitHub, Maven.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/spdy-http2/node-spdy.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone spdy-http2/node-spdy

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:spdy-http2/node-spdy.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link