statically | The CDN for developers | Compression library

Is there generic practices and patterns to succesfully switch from dynamic to static memory allocation without breaking the code ?

No, not really. You'll have to rewrite all such code in pretty radical ways.

You have to realize why all safety-related and embedded systems ban malloc. The main reason is that it is non-deterministic. Instead of allowing completely variable sizes, you have to specify a maximum size for each such item, to cover the worst case scenario of the application.

Also, the presence of things like pointer-to-pointers instead of 2D arrays is a pretty certain indication that the original programmer didn't quite know what they were doing in the first place.

Additionally you need to drop the default types of C for stdint.h ones. That's standard practice in all embedded systems.

In general, I'd strongly advise to drop those "NASA rules" and implement MISRA-C instead. It's a way more professional and in-depth document. Some of the "NASA rules" simply don't make sense and the rest can be summarized as "No s***t Sherlock" beginner-level stuff which we were already told during our first beginner-level C programming class back in school. If these rules come as a surprise to someone, they shouldn't be writing mission-critical firmware in the first place.

Your assumption that there is extra overhead involved is not necessarily correct. Compilers are really good at optimizing things, and it's always worth confirming whether that's the case or not before spending time refactoring the code for what will amount to no benefit whatsoever.

Case in point:

Ok so after all the things I finally got it to working

No need to change the folder to laravel inside root project

No need to change the DocumentRoot

Just Had to change in blade.php from

jellycsc solved my problem. I just had to manually change the system-defined content-type in the S3 console for the individual js objects from text/plain to application/javascript, then make sure the cache was invalidated and refreshed on my browser.

You need to specify the right form control name:

I think typescript infers the "outer" object as this and so you get "obj" from obj.getName3() which is okay because it also matches the class. It has the name attr and all methods so its okay.

If you change obj.name into obj.noname (or one of the fn names) you can not call obj.getName3() because then the obj does not match the class anymore.

Same goes for g(). The outer object of g is void and has no name attribute (and the fns) so you get the other error message.

Read more: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/functions.html#declaring-this-in-a-function

I tried running it, I got the desired output

According to the official documentation there are 2 ways to achieve this but in both of them the hostPath has to be defined.

First approach would be to use hostPath, where hostPath volume uses the local disk of the node to mount the volume and specify the hostPath in Preferences->File Sharing in Docker Desktop.

Second approach would be to use a PersistentVolume approach in which cluster administrator creates the volumes and pods can access them through PersistentVolumeClaims, a level of abstraction between the volume and its storage mechanism.

you need to assign the type casted value t instead of d