stream-to-array | readable stream 's data into a single array | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | stream-to-array Summary
kandi X-RAY | stream-to-array Summary
Concatenate a readable stream's data into a single array.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of stream-to-array
stream-to-array Key Features
stream-to-array Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on stream-to-array
QUESTION
I developed a desktop application with nwjs (nodejs / html / css ), now i want to put the app for the production so i need to prevent stealing my assets (my images are very valuables), nwjs provide a tool to compile (encrypt) the js files but not the asset so i thought about encrypting my assets with a js then encrypt the js with nwjs tool, i am not very familiare with node modules and dealing with files in js so i struggled with this task ! This code is what i tried to do but i did not reach my goal ?
encrypt
...
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jan-02 at 22:19Since you are building a desktop app, you may want to look at cryptojs for this. I would still strongly suggest that you watermark images and hide them when your application looses focus. Even with that, screenshots can be taken without leaving your application.
QUESTION
I have a huge object that serves as a map with 2,7 million keys. I attempt to write the object to the file system, in order to persist it and not recompute it every time I need it. At another step, I need to read the object again. I need to have access to the entire object in memory, as it needs to serve as a map.
For writing, I convert the object to an array and stream it to the file system with the function below. The reason why I convert it to an array first is that it seems to be significantly faster to stream an array instead of an object. The writing part takes about a minute, which is fine. The output file has a size of 4,8GB.
The problem I'm facing is when attempting to read the file. For this, I create a read stream and parse the content.
However, for some reason, I seem to be hitting some sort of memory limit. I used various different approaches for reading and parsing, and they all seem to work up until around 50% of the data is read (at this time the node process on my machine occupies 6GB memory, which is slightly below the limit I set). From then, the reading time significantly increases by factor 10, probably because node is close to using the maximum allocated memory limit (6144MB). It feels like I'm doing something wrong.
The main thing that I don't understand is why writing is not a problem, while reading is, even though during the write step, the entire array is kept in memory as well. I'm using node v8.11.3
.
So to summarize:
- I have a large object I need to persist to the file system as an array using streams
- Writing works fine
- Reading works until around 50% of the data is read, then reading time increases significantly
How can I read the file more performantly?
I tried various libraries, such as stream-to-array, read-json-stream, JSONStream
example of an object to write:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-02 at 16:12I suspect it is running out of memory because you are trying to read all the entries into a single continuous array. As the array fills up, node is going to reallocate the array and copy the existing data to the new array. So as the array gets bigger and bigger, it gets slower and slower. Because it has to have two arrays in place when reallocating, it is also going to use more memory than just the array by itself would.
You could use a database as a few millions rows shouldn't be a problem, or write you own read/write routines making sure you use something that allows non-sequential block memory allocation, eg https://www.npmjs.com/package/big-array
Eg Preallocate an array 10k entries long, read the first 10k entries of the map into the array and write the array to a file. Then read the next 10k entries into the array and write this to a new file. Repeat until you've processed all the entries. That should reduce your memory usage and lend itself to speeding up by running IO in parallel at the expense of using more memory.
QUESTION
I am using 'ssh2-sftp-client' to do this job. So basically it works fine if I copy the file to /tmp/ folder of Lambda first and then upload it to s3. I want to point the read stream to s3 without saving in the lambda /tmp/ folder.
So basically:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-25 at 06:49I used the s3-sftp-bridge, it works seamlessly.
https://github.com/gilt/s3-sftp-bridge
Just needs the s3 location and sftp location with credentials, it is automatically get synced.
Hope it helps.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install stream-to-array
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page