secrets | primary use-case is sharing sensitive data | Identity Management library
kandi X-RAY | secrets Summary
kandi X-RAY | secrets Summary
The primary use-case is sharing sensitive data by making the information self-destructed, accessible only once and protected by easy-to-share PIN code. I just needed a simple and better alternative to the most popular way of passing passwords, which is why this project was created. Doing this by email always made me concerned about the usual "security" of sending user and password info in two different emails - which is just a joke.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Formats status
- Function to setup clipboard buttons
- Get information about the user .
- show link button
- Initialization functions
- create element
- popup event handler
- Get random value
- Check if pin is pressed
- Extend another object
secrets Key Features
secrets Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 8License : Permissive (MIT License)
Copypublic void setSecrets(Map secrets) {
Assert.notNull(secrets);
Assert.hasText(secrets.get(SignatureAlgorithm.HS256.getValue()));
Assert.hasText(secrets.get(SignatureAlgorithm.HS384.getValue()));
Assert.hasText(secrets. @RequestMapping(value = "/refresh-secrets", method = GET)
public Map refreshSecrets() {
return secretService.refreshSecrets();
} @RequestMapping(value = "/get-secrets", method = GET)
public Map getSecrets() {
return secretService.getSecrets();
} Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on secrets
QUESTION
I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".
January 11, 2022 Final brownout.
This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.
Second, check your package.json dependencies for any git:// URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR.
As noted by Jörg W Mittag:
For GitHub Actions:There was a 4-month warning.
The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".
Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.
The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.
As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:
QUESTION
Github Actions were working in my repository till yesterday. I didnt make any changes in .github/workflows/dev.yml file or in DockerFile.
But, suddenly in recent pushes, my Github Actions fail with the error
Setup, Build, Publish, and Deploy
...
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-27 at 13:24I fixed it by changing uses value to
uses: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud@master
QUESTION
I am trying to connect an aws api gateway to a lambda function residing in a VPC then retrieve the secret manager to access a database using python code with boto3. The database and vpc endpoint were created in a private subnet.
lambda function ...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-19 at 21:44If you can call the Lambda function from API Gateway, then your question title "how to connect an aws api gateway to a private lambda function inside a vpc" is already complete and working.
It appears that your actual problem is simply accessing Secrets Manager from inside a Lambda function running in a VPC.
It's also strange that you are assigning a "db" security group to the Lambda function. What are the inbound/outbound rules of this Security Group?
It is entirely unclear why you created a VPC endpoint. What are we supposed to make of service_name = "foo"? What is service "foo"? How is this VPC endpoint related to the Lambda function in any way? If this is supposed to be a VPC endpoint for Secrets Manager, then the service name should be "com.amazonaws.YOUR-REGION.secretsmanager".
If you need more help you need to edit your question to provide the following: The inbound and outbound rules of any relevant security groups, and the Lambda function code that is trying to call SecretsManager.
Update: After clarifications in comments and the updated question, I think the problem is you are missing any subnet assignments for the VPC Endpoint. Also, since you are adding a VPC policy with full access, you can just leave that out entirely, as the default policy is full access. I suggest changing the VPC endpoint to the following:
QUESTION
I'm trying to publish a npm package on GAR (Google Artifact Registry) through github using google-github-actions/auth@v0 and google-artifactregistry-auth
For the authentication to google from github here is what I did to use the Federation Workload Identity:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 12:44I finally find out !!! BUT I'm not sure in term of security if there is any risk or not so if anyone can advice I'll edit the answer !
What is changing but I'm not sure in term of security is here :
QUESTION
I am currently trying to run a docker GitHub Action which builds and pushes a docker image to the GitHub Packages but I am receiving an error which I have never seen. For some reason it fails to push the docker image because write_permission is denied but I have a token allowing me to write so I don't understand what the problem is.
This is my action file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-01 at 13:45currently you precise your github token but not the secrets for DOCKERHUB_USERNAME and DOCKERHUB_TOKEN. You need define in your repositories a new secrets DOCKERHUB_USERNAME and DOCKERHUB_TOKEN as indicated in https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/encrypted-secrets.
You must also create a dockerhub token on dockerhub website portal.
You also need to add this sample code before build and push action.
QUESTION
I've been successfully mounting volumes on Windows 10 in various projects recently using the example docker-compose.yml file below. For a new project today I needed to mount a folder from the Z:/ drive (a network mounted drive which appears as \\IP.IP.IP.IP\public\data (Z:) when I navigate to that area in Windows File Explorer.
When I edit the volumes to point to locations on Z: (e.g. in the second docker-compose.yml below), the volumes are not mounted properly and are empty folders when I connect to the container via the CLI.
Any advice on getting the Z: drive folders to mount properly would be great, thanks.
Working docker-compose.yml file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-06 at 17:46According to this forum thread you would have to use something like this to be able to mount network shares:
QUESTION
I recently created this post trying to figure out how to reference GitHub Secrets in a GitHub action. I believe I got that solved & figured out and I'm onto a different issue.
Below is a sample of the workflow code as of right now, the issue I need help with is the Create and populate .Renviron file part.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-01 at 09:23The file is there where you expect to be
QUESTION
I am trying to get a volume mounted as a non-root user in one of my containers. I'm trying an approach from this SO post using an initContainer to set the correct user, but when I try to start the configuration I get an "unbound immediate PersistentVolumneClaims" error. I suspect it's because the volume is mounted in both my initContainer and container, but I'm not sure why that would be the issue: I can see the initContainer taking the claim, but I would have thought when it exited that it would release it, letting the normal container take the claim. Any ideas or alternatives to getting the directory mounted as a non-root user? I did try using securityContext/fsGroup, but that seemed to have no effect. The /var/rdf4j directory below is the one that is being mounted as root.
Configuration:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-21 at 08:431 pod has unbound immediate PersistentVolumeClaims. - this error means the pod cannot bound to the PVC on the node where it has been scheduled to run on. This can happen when the PVC bounded to a PV that refers to a location that is not valid on the node that the pod is scheduled to run on. It will be helpful if you can post the complete output of kubectl get nodes -o wide, kubectl describe pvc triplestore-data-storage, kubectl describe pv triplestore-data-storage-dir to the question.
The mean time, PVC/PV is optional when using hostPath, can you try the following spec and see if the pod can come online:
QUESTION
I'd like to be able to use GitHub Actions to be able to deploy resources with AWS, but without using a hard-coded user.
I know that it's possible to create an IAM user with a fixed credential, and that can be exported to GitHub Secrets, but this means if the key ever leaks I have a large problem on my hands, and rotating such keys are challenging if forgotten.
Is there any way that I can enable a password-less authentication flow for deploying code to AWS?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 15:37Yes, it is possible now that GitHub have released their Open ID Connector for use with GitHub Actions. You can configure the Open ID Connector as an Identity Provider in AWS, and then use that for an access point to any role(s) that you wish to enable. You can then configure the action to use the credentials acquired for the duration of the job, and when the job is complete, the credentials are automatically revoked.
To set this up in AWS, you need to create an Open Identity Connect Provider using the instructions at AWS or using a Terraform file similar to the following:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-15 at 04:59Note that GitHub (accidentally) updated their thumbprint recently, so the result is now 6938fd4d98bab03faadb97b34396831e3780aea1
More details here https://github.blog/changelog/2022-01-13-github-actions-update-on-oidc-based-deployments-to-aws/
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install secrets
Adjust your local docker-compose.yml with: TZ - your local time zone SIGN_KEY - something long and random MAX_EXPIRE - maximum lifetime period, default 24h PIN_SIZE - size (in characters) of the pin, default 5 PIN_ATTEMPTS - maximum number of failed attempts to enter pin, default 3
Setup SSL: The system can make valid certificates for you automatically with integrated nginx-le. Just set: LETSENCRYPT=true LE_EMAIL=name@example.com LE_FQDN=www.example.com In case you have your own certificates, copy them to etc/ssl and set: SSL_CERT - SSL certificate (file name, not path) SSL_KEY - SSL key (file name, not path)
Run the system with docker-compose up -d. This will download a prepared image from docker hub and start all components.
if you want to build it from sources - docker-compose build will do it, and then docker-compose up -d.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
