pojo | dependency injection manager designed for Plain Old | Dependency Injection library
kandi X-RAY | pojo Summary
kandi X-RAY | pojo Summary
Pojo is a dependency injection manager designed for Plain Old JavaScript Objects.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Get object from provided path
pojo Key Features
pojo Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pojo
QUESTION
Today I hit a wall, when I was about to add new functionality to the app. I had a record with data, but I needed some extra values. Adding this to the record would not make sense, becouse for most cases they will not be used and would be nulls, so I thought inheritance, which made perfect sense in this situation. But there is a problem , becouse Java records do not support inheritance, so I ended up with rewriting record to ugly POJO class with final values and getters.
So my question is basictly - why no inheritance. I understand there is not multiple inheritance becouse it's messy and hard to control on some point, but we also have final classes that cannot be inherited, why couldn't w e have records and final records?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-16 at 10:22See the corresponding JEP:
Records are implicitly final, and cannot be abstract. These restrictions emphasize that the API of a record is defined solely by its state description, and cannot be enhanced later by another class or record.
The components of a record are implicitly final. This restriction embodies an immutable by default policy that is widely applicable for data aggregates.
The point is that reducing the realm of usage patterns, the compiler/JVM can do the sort of optimisations that the record concept is about.
Meaning: if you allow for subclassing, the runtime will have to deal with polymorphism. Which is not the intention behind records.
QUESTION
I have quite a few projects that is slowly being migrated from Java to Kotlin, but I'm facing a problem when changing from Java POJO to Kotlin data classes. Bean validation stops working in REST controllers. I have created a very simple project directly from https://start.spring.io to demonstrate the failure.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-16 at 07:38I think you are just missing @Validated annotation on top of your controller class.
QUESTION
Many years of using Scala and still I don't know the right way to interoperate with Java. :(
To be honest, this is not something that I'm doing every day, but sometimes there is no other option (today is Firestore Java libraries).
My question today is about the proper way to instantiate POJOs that can have null values.
At the end of the day, I always use something like the def toJavaLong(l: Option[Long]): java.lang.Long = if (l.isEmpty) l.get else null
, but pretty sure that there is a better and elegant way.
Please, could you show me the path? I expect something like orNull
working out of the box, but it is never the case.
I'm using Scala 2.13, but feel free to show alternatives to Scala 3 as well.
In the next example, I explain the errors that I have using orNull
and getOrElse
:
Pojo:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-31 at 20:53The problem, in this case, is not the null
, but the fact that scala.Long
is not the same as java.lang.Long
What you can do is the following:
QUESTION
I have JSON like below
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-20 at 10:27Consider to use JsonNode and fuse a hierarchy loop to extract all the keys and values dynamically regardless of patterns and relations and values,
QUESTION
I am trying to use firebase-server-timestamp
to show the user when he/she send their order to us.
The problem I encounter is, that the server-timestamp
is showing a wrong time (e.g: Current time is 12:30, but timestamp shows 12:15).
How is that possible?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-25 at 11:59I'm not sure but I think I've seen this happen before and in that case (but I might be wrong here) I think the emulator/phone where the app is running on had the wrong date/time set. So Timestamp now was wrong as well.
QUESTION
I have a controller that accepts ObjectNode
as @RequestBody
.
That ObjectNode
represents json
with some user data
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-28 at 12:22Register Jackson ParameterNamesModule, which will automatically map JSON attributes to the corresponding constructor attributes and therefore will allow you to use immutable classes.
QUESTION
Given below code snippet, for each field of POJO class, is there a way to check if the type is an integer list or not? The real problem here is the type argument, since it's quite easy to check if it's a list via instanceof
or isAssignableFrom
.
Lines in main
is what I have found so far, but it does not work for those types with more complex class hierarchy.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-26 at 10:50You are right, this is not an easy problem because of erasure. However, I think it is not unsolvable.
The fundamental principle should be to follow and replace the type variables with actual parameter types all the way to List
.
Consider these two classes:
QUESTION
I've used Jackson for years, and I am not sure I ever faced this issue.
Using Jackson 2.12.5 in a Spring Boot 2.5.5 project, I have an object that I need to serialize. I have no issue with other fields, but these 2 fields are causing me problems :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-24 at 18:54The problem seems to be caused by how JavaBeans methods get generated when there's a single lowercase character at the beginning of the property name. You might be surprised by the fact that getpId
and getcId
are indeed correctly named, just as I was.
In short, pId
correctly results in the getter getpId
rather than the Lombok-generated getPId
(the one JavaBeans should have kept, in my opinion).
Now, the interesting part is that Jackson makes cid
and pid
out of getCId
and getPId
, respectively, for some reason... while at the same time producing cId
and pId
for getcId
and getpId
.
So while getcId
and getpId
are a quirk of JavaBeans, it seems that Jackson is behaving correctly by default, when the getters are correctly named, i.e., getpId -> "pId"
and getcId -> "cId"
.
Given that Lombok generates getPId
and getCId
, which lead to the all-lowercase keys in the resulting JSON, deserialization does not work.
If you don't like the getpId
/getcId
naming, then you may have to write your own getters and force a property name explicitly:
QUESTION
Since onSaveInstanceState
& onRestoreInstanceState
can't be used to store/restore values after closed the app, I tried to use dataStore to solve it, but it dosen't work, here's my trying
DataStoreRepository
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-20 at 10:33As the SharedPreference
will be deprecated soon or later, there is an Update below using DataStore
.
SharedPreference
onSaveInstanceState
& onRestoreInstanceState
can't be used to store/restore values after the app is closed/shut.
Even if the app is not closed, you can't rely on them for storing large objects or storing objects for a long time.
Instead of that you can use SharedPreference
to store a value that maps to last open fragment before the app exists.
Here I store some arbitrary value, as it's recommended not to store application IDs, as they can vary from app launch to another. So, you can store arbitrary values and map them to the generated IDs in the current app launch.
I picked those values as array indices:
QUESTION
This question is somehow related to my last question, because it is the same project but now I am trying to go one more step forward.
So, in my previous question I only had one table; this time I have two tables: the new second table is supposed to contain related attributes for the rows of the first table, in a OneToMany relationship. So, I store a ForeignKey in the second table that would store the Row ID of the first table's related row (obviously).
The problem is this: the intention is creating both registers (parent and child) at the same time, using the same form, and ParentTable uses AUTO_INCREMENT for his PrimaryKey (AKA ID).
Due to how RoomDb works, I do the creation using a POJO: but after insertion, this POJO won't give me the auto-generated ID as far as I know... so, the only workaround I am able to imagine is, when submitting the form, first make the INSERT for the parent, then using one of the form's fields that created the parent to make some kind of "SELECT * FROM parent_table WHERE field1 LIKE :field1", retrieving the ID, and then use that ID to create the child table's POJO and perform the next INSERT operation. However I feel something's not right about this approach, the last time I implemented something similar this way I ended up with a lot of Custom Listeners and a callback hell (I still have nightmares about that).
About the Custom Listeners thing, it is the solution I ended up choosing for a different problem for a different project (more details about it in this old question). Taking a look to that old question might help adding some context about how misguided I am in MVVM's architecture. However, please notice the current question has nothing to do with WebServices, because the Database is purely local in the phone's app, no external sources.
However, I am wondering: isn't this overkill (I mean the INSERT parent -> SELECT parentID -> INSERT child
thing)? Is it inevitable having to do it this way, or there is rather a more clean way to do so?
The "create method" in my Repository class looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-08 at 08:48You are on the right track. A clean way would be to wrap it in a function like this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pojo
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page