javascript-modules | code samples for article : Using npm and ES6 | Script Programming library
kandi X-RAY | javascript-modules Summary
kandi X-RAY | javascript-modules Summary
A blog post about using NPM and ES6 modules. If you have any corrections, suggestions, clarifications. Includes some very simple Browserify and Webpack ES6 Module examples in the example-code directory.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of javascript-modules
javascript-modules Key Features
javascript-modules Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on javascript-modules
QUESTION
Tonight I decided to start learning to use Webpack and Encore.
Just started and I already got a problem: Jquery does not exist in my templates but it does in my console.
How did i get here:
- First I downloaded the depencies:
composer require symfony/webpack-encore-bundle; yarn install; yarn add jquery --dev
- Then, I built my assets:
yarn encore dev --watch
- I updated my assets/app.js file so it (should?) imports Jquery:
... import $ from 'jquery'; ...
- Finally, I wrote my code in my templates/base.html.twig file:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-18 at 02:18I fixed it by adding const $ = require('jquery'); global.$ = global.jQuery = $;
in the assets/app.js file.
QUESTION
is it possible to bundle modules to a single minified .js to include in a single tag ? I know it's a different story with server-side js packages, but in my case, it's really intended to be loaded by a browser and I don't want to have multiple http requests.
Here is an over-simplified example, of sub-trees / namespaces that aren't necessarily related together, but ultimately grouped together in a single object:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-26 at 12:57is it possible to bundle modules to a single minified .js to include in a single tag ?
Yes, this is one of the things bundlers like Webpack and Rollup.js do.
I know some bundlers do tree shaking in order to only deploy the minimum, but in my case, everything has to be included, as we don't know what the browser will do with it (for example, play with it in the console)
You can turn tree-shaking off. It can be non-obvious, but for instance this answer shows how to turn it off in Webpack 4. It's more straight-forward with Rollup: There's an option.
That said, if playing with things from the console is an expected use-case, modules may not be the best choice, since they encapsulate their contents rather than dumping everything into global scope.
QUESTION
I am running CORB for converting my data to CSV . When i am running with THREAD-COUNT-1
it is working perfectly fine means i am getting all the file outputs in CSV file. But when i increased the thread-size and Batch-size it is showing less number of output files in my CSV file. I dont know why?
Below is my Properties file
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-14 at 02:25The issue is that only the last evaluated expression is returned from a JavaScript module. You are generating strings inside of the for loop, so when you set the BATCH-SIZE greater than 1, only the last item from your for loop is being returned.
You could increase your THREAD-COUNT and keep the BATCH-SIZE=1 and should get the desired output without changing the process module.
In order for your process module to return the desired results with a BATCH-SIZE greater than 1, you need to collect the results as you process the data inside of your for loop, and then return all of the data outside of the for loop. You can collect the data by pushing into an Array variable and then return a Sequence of strings using Sequence.from().
You can use the fn.stringJoin() function to produce a CSV. The first parameter is the sequence of values, which you can put into an array, and the second parameter is the value to join with.
QUESTION
This is strange. Using this tutorial: https://ntdln.com/2017/07/25/using-javascript-modules/ I tried to do get the modules thing in JS. I run npm istall grunt-browserify --save-dev
along with the other packages. My package.json file is
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Dec-13 at 18:46Use grunt browserify like below :
QUESTION
I followed the first part of https://clojurescript.org/guides/javascript-modules and the part where I execute lein trampoline run -m clojure.main watch.clj
shows this
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Sep-08 at 08:16I think it's all about CLJS version.
Try this:
project.clj
QUESTION
Due the fact, that ES6-modules (JavaScript-modules) are available for testing:
- https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5365692190687232
- https://medium.com/dev-channel/es6-modules-in-chrome-canary-m60-ba588dfb8ab7
I wonder, how should I minify and prepare the project release-file? Earlier, I havde bundled all JavaScript-files into the single and minified file, except situations, where I have to load the JS-file dynamically via XHR or Fetch API.
As I understand, it's rather impossible to prepare a single-minified file with the ES6-modules right now or may be, I'm just misunderstanding some ways of work.
So, are the any ways to prepare my ES6-modules into single file and how I should prepare the modern JavaScript-project in 2017 year, where JavaScript-modules will be available?
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jul-30 at 14:24This blog explains how you would use the ES6 module syntax
and yet still bundle your code into something that the browser will understand.
The blog explains that using SystemJs
as an ES6 module polyfill
and Babel
along with Gulp
will enable you to code you modules in ES6
yet sill be able to use it today.
Using this guide will help you write your code in ES6 while still having a normal workflow to building, minifying and bundling your code.
Keep in mind there are a lot of tools out there that will help you achieve this but I've followed this method many times and I can vouch for its validity.
QUESTION
I am using Sonarqube on a Maven multi-module projects which contains Java and Javascript modules.
All my tests results are (seems to be) read by Sonarqube as the code coverage looks good. When I check files by files, it also looks covered properly.
However, the amount of tests ran on the project homepage is incorrect: I only have the amount of Java tests (617). The Javascript tests count is missing (1646).
Here are my Sonar properties in the root pom.xml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jul-06 at 08:17I finally figured out what I was missing:
- First, I was not generating the unit test report within my karma.conf.js
- Then, I found a very useful Sonar report for karma: karma-sonarqube-unit-reporter
- Finally, I updated my pom.xml to use generic test result (sonar.testExecutionReportPaths property)
Now it works perfectly. I hope my struggle could help other people :)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install javascript-modules
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page